[{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/retrew-wikipedia\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/retrew-wikipedia\/","headline":"Retrew – Wikipedia","name":"Retrew – Wikipedia","description":"Reinricher are farmers in the former GDR who, after the political turn in 1989\/1990, have reclaimed and received their country","datePublished":"2020-02-01","dateModified":"2020-02-01","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/author\/lordneo\/#Person","name":"lordneo","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/author\/lordneo\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44a4cee54c4c053e967fe3e7d054edd4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44a4cee54c4c053e967fe3e7d054edd4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/4\/4a\/Pictogram_voting_info.svg\/15px-Pictogram_voting_info.svg.png","url":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/4\/4a\/Pictogram_voting_info.svg\/15px-Pictogram_voting_info.svg.png","height":"15","width":"15"},"url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/retrew-wikipedia\/","wordCount":1656,"articleBody":"Reinricher are farmers in the former GDR who, after the political turn in 1989\/1990, have reclaimed and received their country brought into the agricultural production cooperative in order to start a fresh start as farmers. Retirements can be former LPG farmers who again manage the areas that are once belonging to them or as a sideline, partly as a pensioner on the family sacper of a few hectares. Retirements were also able to be the former head of agricultural production cooperatives if they or their family had brought property into the LPG in the course of collectivization. Of the overall reorganization and new registrations in Thuringia, 158 heads of the agricultural production cooperatives were rejoice. [first] A distinction must be made between \u201cnew organizations\u201d. These were (mostly younger) farmers who manage new companies with leasehold and newly acquired technology. Third, it was also possible that re -bodies or new organizations were not previously living in the GDR, but in particular from the West German federal states and from Holland “immigrated” and newly established or inherited companies. In Thuringia, for example, 187 of the 1,043 places from the old federal states and in 1995 managed 54,800 hectares, which is approximately 26% of the area, which the places in Thuringia managed (213,700 hectares). [2] The basis for the re -establishment of agricultural businesses was the Agricultural Adjustment Act (LWANPG or “LAG”), which was decided in June 1990 by the freely elected Volkskammer. His full title was “Law on the structural adaptation of agriculture to the social and ecological market economy in the German Democratic Republic”. The promotion of private property and equal opportunities for all forms should create a diverse agricultural structure in which cooperatives and rural family businesses complement each other. The equal opportunities of all forms of operating were defined in paragraph 2 of the LAG. In addition to the areas organized in the course of the collectivization, there were areas expropriated by ground reform. In order to handle re-privatization, among other things, the state trustee was created or the legal successor of the soil recycling and administration GmbH. The former owners expropriated by 1949 did not get their plots expropriated law. Only recognized refugees were able to register a claim for compensation via the load compensation. In 1994 the compensation and compensatory performance law (EALG) was passed for those expropriated on occupying the crew (in the exact wording “Law on the compensation according to the law on the law on the regulation of open asset issues and on state compensation for expropriations on occupation law or occupational sovereign foundation of September 27, 1994 ( Bgbl. I 2624). Affected areas, companies and employees in the conversion of the GDR structures as a whole [ Edit | Edit the source text ] The approximately 5.8 million hectares of agricultural area of \u200b\u200bthe GDR, 850,000 employees and over 4,000 farms were affected by the structural change. These were legally separated into LPG (plant production) and LPG (animal production). In 1988 there were 1,159 LPG (P) and 2,696 LPG (T), which were organized together in so -called “cooperation”. The LPG (P) manages an average of 4,500 hectares of agricultural land. [3] For comparison: the average per operation in the old federal states, on the other hand, was only 35 ha.In addition to the agricultural production cooperatives, there were also state -owned goods. In 1988 the 79 VEG (P) and 311 VEG (T). [3] In 1989 they went to the trust company for privatization. In 1990 the trust fell to the agricultural area around 1.95 million ha of agriculture. Of these, 1.5 million hectares were managed by the LPG and 450,000 hectares of the VEG. [4] Of the 1.95 million hectares, 0.6 million hectares had to be returned to countries, municipalities and previous owners who had been expropriated after 1949 and were therefore entitled to return issues according to the law. The remaining 1.3 million hectares of LF were privatized. In practice, the structural adaptation of the East German agricultural landscape to the social market economy was not without friction and injustices. In particular, the conversion of the LPG into registered cooperatives and other legal forms were often conflicting. The leadership of the successors mostly took over former LPG chairwoman or GDR agricultural officials, to whom their good training, their close networking in business, administration and politics as well as their experience gave a significant start advantage. At the beginning of privatization, there were often systematic counterfeiting in which the value of machines, buildings, cattle stock and other inventory of the relevant LPG was calculated. [5] The members of the LPG were only paid out a fraction of their share when it left, while the actual assets disappeared as a capital stock in the successors. [5] Four out of five in agriculture lost their jobs until 1993. [5] The number of businesses, on the other hand, increased continuously. Only a few former cooperative builders took the step into self -employment, since the specialized milking, zookeepers or tractorists were often lacking. Instead, many leased the country to other interested parties or sold it. To date, the favoring of the high -tech large -scale agriculture in the allocation of Agrarland is a problem of medium -sized forms of family ownership and smaller country building systems. [5] Unlike in West Germany, large-scale corporate forms still shape the East German Agricultural Structure, especially in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Brandenburg, where large property of the Ostelbian knights dominated before 1945 and the proportion of trust areas was correspondingly high from 1990. In 2010 there were around 24,800 companies in the new federal states with an average size of 226 ha. In the old federal states, on the other hand, the average size was 40 hectares. In 2010 there were around 3,500 legal entities in the new federal states, who managed 2,848,500 hectares and 3,200 partnerships, the 1,240,400 hectares of managing 7,700 main business companies, who manage 1,157,800 hectares. As a result, the main acquisition companies represent 79% of the companies in the new federal states as potential reverberation and new funds, but only manage about 20% of the area. [6] \u2191  Katrin Kuester: The East German farmers and the turn. (PDF; 2.2 MB) CASH 2002, ISBN 3-933316-96-96-8, PLAY  \u2191  Katrin Kuester: The East German farmers and the turn. (PDF; 2.2 MB) Kassel 2002, ISBN 3-933146-96-8, pp. 217 and 239.  \u2191 a b  Coradrad rise it old .: GDR. Economic and social geography. Gotha 1990, ISBN 3-7301-0882-4, S.  \u2191  Manfred L\u00fcckemeyer: The privatization of the agricultural “state -owned” assets in the new federal states. In: Reports about agriculture. 70, 1992, S. 387\u2013395.  \u2191 a b c d  MDR.DE: The agricultural adaptation law and its consequences ( Memento of the Originals from August 27, 2016 in Internet Archive )  Info: The archive link has been used automatically and not yet checked. Please check original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this note. @first @2 Template: Webachiv\/Iabot\/www.mdr.de , accessed on January 20, 2012.  \u2191  Agricultural report of the Federal Government 2011: bmel.de (PDF), S. 69.   "},{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/retrew-wikipedia\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Retrew – Wikipedia"}}]}]