Römeruden – Wikipedia

The term Röm Equal describes the six poems at the beginning of the third of the four Oden books of the Roman poet Horaz; He is generally proven for the first time about Theodor Plüss ’Horazstudien from 1882. ^[first]

after-content-x4

For the togetherness of these texts, the metric formally speaks: one and the same measure (the so -called “alceane stanza”) for half a dozen consecutive poems can only be found here in the horazquer poetry. ^[2]In addition, the announcement ‘previously disadvantaged poems’ has at the beginning of the third Oden book (c. 3.1.2 f.: Carmina is not already / hearing ) Expect more than just one individual text.

Apparently the late antique grammatist Diomedes has already read or counted the “Romanodes” as a poem; ^[3]Probably the former Horaz compathor Pomponius Porphyrio also seems to point in this direction. ^[4]In addition to questions about the development, dating ^[5]and arrangement ^[6]In the factory, there are especially the connection and unity of the accepted poem cycle and the “political” Horaz ^[7]The focus of modern research.

Theodor Mommsen: Speech to celebrate King Frederick II and Kaiser Wilhelm II. [ The first six poems of the third book of the songs of the Horaz ] In: Otto Hirschfeld (ed.): Meeting reports of the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences . 1889, pp. 23–35 [again in: Talk and essay . Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, Berlin 1905 (reprint: Dogma, Bremen 2012), pp. 168–184]
Jurken: To appreciate the Romanodes of the Horaz . In: Literary , 57, 1898, S. 289–306.
Friedrich Kreppel: The cycle of the Horazian Romanodes. I. part . (Program of the K. Humanistic high school for the school year 1902/1903). Print Hermann Kayser, Kaiserslautern 1903
Karl theodor shirts: The Romanodes of the Horaz . (Program of the Royal High School in Ellwangen on the end of the school year 1904-1905). Print the IPF and Jagst-Zeitung , Ellwangen 1905
Hendrik Wagenvoort: The Horace has called the Romans . Diss. Groningen 1911.
Giorgio Pasquali: Orazio lyrical. Education . Felice Le Monnier, Florenz 1920 (Nachdruck 1966), S. 649–710 (Kap. 3 ‘The Roman elements of Orazio’s lyric’: “2. The Roman hatreds (III 1–6).”).
Richard Heinze: The cycle of the Romanodes . In: New yearbooks for science and youth education , 5, 1929, pp. 675–687 [again in: Erich Burck (ed.): From the spirit of Roman . 4th, through edition. Teubner, Stuttgart 1972, pp. 190–205].
Carl Koch: The cycle of the Romanodes . In: New yearbooks , 4, 1941, pp. 62–83 [again in: Otto Seel (ed.): Religio. Studies on the cult and faith of the Romans (Erlangen contributions to language and art science 7). Verlag Hans Carl, Nuremberg 1960, pp. 114–141].
Leiv Amundsen: The ‘Roman Odes’ of Horace . In: And Eitremiana (Symbolae Osloenses Supplement 11). Oslo 1942, S. 1–24 [dt. The Romanodes of the Horaz. A presentation . Translated from English by Volker Eggers. In: Hans Oppermann (ed.): Paths to Horaz (= Ways of Research 99). Scientific Book Society, Darmstadt 1972, pp. 111–138].
Laura O. Sangiacomo: The Roman hatreds . Rome (Roma) 1942 (a commented special edition with translation).
Walter War: Horaz and the Augustei culture. Benno Schwabe & Co., Basel 1948 (reprint in 1966; as 2nd, unchanged edition already a scientific book company, Darmstadt 1965), pp. 201-211.
Friedrich Klingner: Horazen’s rumor . In: Various various . Equipment for Karl Reinhardt (offered by friends and students on February 14, 1951). Böhlau, Münster/Cologne 1952, pp. 118–136 [again in: Klaus Bartels (ed.): Studies on Greek and Roman literature . Artemis, Zurich/Stuttgart 1964, pp. 333–352].
Eduard Fraenkel: Horaz . (engl. Original Horace . Clarendon Press, Oxford 1957). Scientific Book Society, Darmstadt 1963, 6th edition 1983, pp. 308–341.
His Opperman: To build the Romanodes . In: Gymnasium , 66, 1959, S. 204–217.
Karl Büchner: The Romanodes . In: Studies on Roman literature. Volume III: Horaz . Franz Steiner Verlag, Wiesbaden 1962, pp. 125–138 [also in addition to a contribution The unity of the Romanodes In the Horaz chapter from: The Roman poetry. Texts, translations, interpretations, history . Reclam, Stuttgart 1976 (2nd edition 1983), pp. 139–163].
Jean-Marie André: Roman Odes. Divine mission, otium and chief apotheosis . In: Jacqueline Bibauw (ed.): Tributes to Marcel Renard I (Collection Latomus 101). Latomus, Brussels (Bruxelles) 1969, pp. 31–46.
Pierre Grimal: The Roman Odes of Horace and the causes of the civil war . In: Latin studies review , 53, 1975, S. 135–156.
Charles Witke: Horace’s Roman Odes. An Critical Examination . In: Mnemosyne , Supplement 77. Brill, Leiden 1983.
Michael von Albrecht: Horazen’s rumor . In: Acta Antiqua Academy of Sciences Hungarian , 30, 1982–1984, S. 229–241.
Dieter Lohmann: Horaz Carmen III 2 and the cycle of the ‘Römer-Oden’ . In: The old language teaching , 34,3, 1991, S. 62–75.
Karl Numberger: Horaz – lyrical poems. Commentary for high schools teachers and for students . 3. Edition. Aschendorff, Münster 1997, pp. 420–422.
His Peter Syndikus: The poetry of the Horaz. An interpretation of the Oden. Volume II: third and fourth book . 3rd, completely newly edited edition. Scientific Book Society, Darmstadt 2001, pp. 3–6 (“The cycle of the Romanodes”).
Gregor Maurach: Horaz. Work and life . (Scientific comments on Greek and Latin writers). Winter, Heidelberg 2001, pp. 219–257 (X. Chapter-Political Mahnen: The “Roman Onden”).
Robin G. M. Nisbet, Niall Rudd: A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III . Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004, S. xx–xxi (“3. The ›Roman Odes‹”).
Friedemann Weitz: The ‘Romanodes’ on the crossroads. A snapshot on an effective keyword (in) Horaz research .

↑ Hans Theodor Plüss: Horaz studies. Old and new attachments about Horazian poetry . Teubner, Leipzig 1882. Niklas Holzberg claims without more precise evidence Horaz. Poet and work . C.H.Beck, Munich 2009, p. 149): “Anyone who shaped the term” Romanodes ” – it has existed since the middle of the 19th century and is used internationally today – can no longer be clearly determined today.”; Perhaps this dating of the note at Fraenkel (p. 308 footn. 1): “T. Plüß, Horaz studies, 1882, p. 185 ff. The term ‘the Romanodes’ seems to be used as a very usual one. As [sc. Arthur Woollgar] Veral 1884 his studies [Sc.: Literary and Historical] published in the Odes of Horace [sc. London: MacMillan and Co.], he knew the book of Plüß (tract, 8, note 2); He himself says p. 106: ‘The ›Römer-Oden‹ as they are some sometime called’. ”In their way, both scholars in the skeptical assessment of the collective term:“ The custom, or. 3, 1–6 to give the heading ‘Römeroden’ is not above any criticism. ”With Fraenkel (p. 308) and“ Of course, it is not a happy term. ”At Holzberg ( Horaz. Poet and work . C.H.Beck, Munich 2009, p. 149); Lohmann (p. 67) notes in a similar direction: “One has got used to the first six poems (sc. of the third Oden book) because of the metric agreement and on the basis of a very questionable preliminary understanding under the (which has been common for about a hundred years ) To summarize the title ›Römeroden‹. ”And quasi in summary Gerhard Binder: War service and peace service. About “political poetry” and the 2nd Ode des Horaz “to the youth” . In: Acta Antiqua Academy of Sciences Hungarian , 39, 1999, pp. 53–72 Right at the beginning (p. 53): “› Romanodes ‹has been called the most controversial group of lyrical poems of the Horaz since the 19th century, the six Carmina in Alkean stanza at the beginning of the 3rd Book. ³The poems, which is undoubtedly united by the poet to a cycle, is already awarded a uniform line and function with this labeling: they contained the poet’s political credo and had the same goal, the efforts and measures of Augustus aimed at the moral rebirth of the Roman people to support<. Especially in German Horaz philology, interpretative hardening has caused it, which have been difficult for a long time to perceive in the poem group in addition to the undoubtedly existing affirmative, ›patriotic‹, others for the poetry of the Horaz. ”With the footnote 3 : "E. Fraenkel: Horace (Oxford 1957) 260: ›The Habit of Attaching The Label’ Roman Odes ’To Odes III. 1–6 may be open to criticism. ‹After Fraenkel a. O. Note 1 probably a German concept; ... “An early criticism is in Carl Naucks Horaz declarations for school use (Teubner, Leipzig 1889, p. 146, books.google.de ): “The Oden III. 1–6 has recently been referred to as Römeroden. ”In the fourteenth, newly edited edition of this work, on the other hand, the new editor Otto Weissenfels (Teubner, Leipzig 1894) writes in the“ Introduction ”(§ 22, here S . 18): “Above all, those great solemn poems in which the virtues of the old Rome and Rome are glorious past, in which Augustus, Drusus and Tiberius are glorified, primarily the six first poems of the third book, so primarily Which one has therefore also called the Romanodes. ”As a small impetus for further science -historical studies, it is finally for the year 1880 – from a second edition! – Hermann Schütz to c. 3.1 cited ( Q. Horatius Flaccus. Explained by H. Sch. First part: Oden and Epodes . Second edition. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, Berlin, p. 174): “About the general inner connection of the following 6 so -called political or Romanodes see below. Krit. Appendix. ”
↑ The classic German Horaz comment by Kießling/Heinze states in his seventh edition of 1930 (p. 248): “H. [oraz] only has three otherwise [sc. c. 2.13-15], rare [sc. c. 1.9 f.; 1,24 f.; 1,26 f.; 1.34 f.; c. 2.19 f.; c. 4,14 f.] Two poems of the same stanza form put side by side ”.
↑ “The first Ode Alcaicum metrum,” I hate the profanity of the meter and bell. “Second Ode Asclepiadeum meter and by four times. For two tripodes, two tripodia, which is white” ” (Dritte Buch: Die Erste Ode hat Hat Alkäische meter, das gleichartig skandiert wird: I hate profane fame and emotions. On zweite ode [nach landläufiger Zählung. 3,7] hat ein Asklepiadäisches meter und wird zu je vier versen skandiert , Denn es gibt darin zwei (Mal den metrischen Einschnitt), penthemimeres’ und daktylisch zwei tripodien, what you weep, asterie, which you are white).
↑ “Haec autem ᾠδή multiplex per varios deducta est sensus” (this ODE is carried out in many ways in different moods): “You can only understand this in such a way that in this a song longest A uniform topic varies in a variety of ways ( by various perception ). “(Lohmann p. 67)
↑ The title ‘Augustus’, which has become a name, became Octavian (mostly ‘Caesar’ at Horaz, which means Gaius Iulius Caesar today!) In January 27 BC. BC awarded and thus marks the so -called. terminus post who for the third (c. 3,3,11) and fifth ode (c. 3.5.3); The ratio of the calls integrated in a poem are less clear to repair the sanctuaries of the gods (c. from AC) due to the authorization by the Senate 82 City Roman temples (“Duo et Octoginta Templa Deum in Urbe Consul Sextum Ex Auctoritate Senatus Refeci”; Achievements of St. Augustus 20). Either way, the (generally assumed) publication of the first three Oden books in 23 BC. The temporal limit for conception (‘program’), drafting and arrangement of all 88 contained ‘songs’.
↑ Such a conscious approach to the creation of his poem collection (s) seems to be undisputed for Horaz: The first book of the Oden begins with no less than nine poems in different sizes (so -called “paradeodes”), the second with the change of alceanic and sapphian stanza form over Eleven poems before c. 2.12 Another measure appears.
↑ Pointed pointed in the tusculum edition of Gerhard Fink ( Horaz. Oden and epodes . Artemis & Winkler, Düsseldorf/Zurich 2002, p. 340): “Anyone who can not get used to the thought in the shadow of August. , because of the right, the praise, which is sometimes exuberantly donated, either accepted as serious or regarded as an expression of serviler crawl. In one case, the intellect, in the other the character of the poet is poorly away. ”As a Gretchen question about the“ Römer-Oden ”resp. You could raise your author as an example: how do you hold it with c. 3.2.13? (“Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori”: sweet and honorable to die for the fatherland.)

[1] Hans Theodor Plüss: Horaz studies. Old and new attachments about Horazian poetry . Teubner, Leipzig 1882. Niklas Holzberg claims without more precise evidence Horaz. Poet and work . C.H.Beck, Munich 2009, p. 149): “Anyone who shaped the term” Romanodes ” – it has existed since the middle of the 19th century and is used internationally today – can no longer be clearly determined today.”; Perhaps this dating of the note at Fraenkel (p. 308 footn. 1): “T. Plüß, Horaz studies, 1882, p. 185 ff. The term ‘the Romanodes’ seems to be used as a very usual one. As [sc. Arthur Woollgar] Veral 1884 his studies [Sc.: Literary and Historical] published in the Odes of Horace [sc. London: MacMillan and Co.], he knew the book of Plüß (tract, 8, note 2); He himself says p. 106: ‘The ›Römer-Oden‹ as they are some sometime called’. ”In their way, both scholars in the skeptical assessment of the collective term:“ The custom, or. 3, 1–6 to give the heading ‘Römeroden’ is not above any criticism. ”With Fraenkel (p. 308) and“ Of course, it is not a happy term. ”At Holzberg ( Horaz. Poet and work . C.H.Beck, Munich 2009, p. 149); Lohmann (p. 67) notes in a similar direction: “One has got used to the first six poems (sc. of the third Oden book) because of the metric agreement and on the basis of a very questionable preliminary understanding under the (which has been common for about a hundred years ) To summarize the title ›Römeroden‹. ”And quasi in summary Gerhard Binder: War service and peace service. About “political poetry” and the 2nd Ode des Horaz “to the youth” . In: Acta Antiqua Academy of Sciences Hungarian , 39, 1999, pp. 53–72 Right at the beginning (p. 53): “› Romanodes ‹has been called the most controversial group of lyrical poems of the Horaz since the 19th century, the six Carmina in Alkean stanza at the beginning of the 3rd Book. ³The poems, which is undoubtedly united by the poet to a cycle, is already awarded a uniform line and function with this labeling: they contained the poet’s political credo and had the same goal, the efforts and measures of Augustus aimed at the moral rebirth of the Roman people to support<. Especially in German Horaz philology, interpretative hardening has caused it, which have been difficult for a long time to perceive in the poem group in addition to the undoubtedly existing affirmative, ›patriotic‹, others for the poetry of the Horaz. ”With the footnote 3 : "E. Fraenkel: Horace (Oxford 1957) 260: ›The Habit of Attaching The Label’ Roman Odes ’To Odes III. 1–6 may be open to criticism. ‹After Fraenkel a. O. Note 1 probably a German concept; ... “An early criticism is in Carl Naucks Horaz declarations for school use (Teubner, Leipzig 1889, p. 146, books.google.de ): “The Oden III. 1–6 has recently been referred to as Römeroden. ”In the fourteenth, newly edited edition of this work, on the other hand, the new editor Otto Weissenfels (Teubner, Leipzig 1894) writes in the“ Introduction ”(§ 22, here S . 18): “Above all, those great solemn poems in which the virtues of the old Rome and Rome are glorious past, in which Augustus, Drusus and Tiberius are glorified, primarily the six first poems of the third book, so primarily Which one has therefore also called the Romanodes. ”As a small impetus for further science -historical studies, it is finally for the year 1880 – from a second edition! – Hermann Schütz to c. 3.1 cited ( Q. Horatius Flaccus. Explained by H. Sch. First part: Oden and Epodes . Second edition. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, Berlin, p. 174): “About the general inner connection of the following 6 so -called political or Romanodes see below. Krit. Appendix. ”

[2] The classic German Horaz comment by Kießling/Heinze states in his seventh edition of 1930 (p. 248): “H. [oraz] only has three otherwise [sc. c. 2.13-15], rare [sc. c. 1.9 f.; 1,24 f.; 1,26 f.; 1.34 f.; c. 2.19 f.; c. 4,14 f.] Two poems of the same stanza form put side by side ”.

[3] “The first Ode Alcaicum metrum,” I hate the profanity of the meter and bell. “Second Ode Asclepiadeum meter and by four times. For two tripodes, two tripodia, which is white” ” (Dritte Buch: Die Erste Ode hat Hat Alkäische meter, das gleichartig skandiert wird: I hate profane fame and emotions. On zweite ode [nach landläufiger Zählung. 3,7] hat ein Asklepiadäisches meter und wird zu je vier versen skandiert , Denn es gibt darin zwei (Mal den metrischen Einschnitt), penthemimeres’ und daktylisch zwei tripodien, what you weep, asterie, which you are white).

[4] “Haec autem ᾠδή multiplex per varios deducta est sensus” (this ODE is carried out in many ways in different moods): “You can only understand this in such a way that in this a song longest A uniform topic varies in a variety of ways ( by various perception ). “(Lohmann p. 67)

[5] The title ‘Augustus’, which has become a name, became Octavian (mostly ‘Caesar’ at Horaz, which means Gaius Iulius Caesar today!) In January 27 BC. BC awarded and thus marks the so -called. terminus post who for the third (c. 3,3,11) and fifth ode (c. 3.5.3); The ratio of the calls integrated in a poem are less clear to repair the sanctuaries of the gods (c. from AC) due to the authorization by the Senate 82 City Roman temples (“Duo et Octoginta Templa Deum in Urbe Consul Sextum Ex Auctoritate Senatus Refeci”; Achievements of St. Augustus 20). Either way, the (generally assumed) publication of the first three Oden books in 23 BC. The temporal limit for conception (‘program’), drafting and arrangement of all 88 contained ‘songs’.

[6] Such a conscious approach to the creation of his poem collection (s) seems to be undisputed for Horaz: The first book of the Oden begins with no less than nine poems in different sizes (so -called “paradeodes”), the second with the change of alceanic and sapphian stanza form over Eleven poems before c. 2.12 Another measure appears.

[7] Pointed pointed in the tusculum edition of Gerhard Fink ( Horaz. Oden and epodes . Artemis & Winkler, Düsseldorf/Zurich 2002, p. 340): “Anyone who can not get used to the thought in the shadow of August. , because of the right, the praise, which is sometimes exuberantly donated, either accepted as serious or regarded as an expression of serviler crawl. In one case, the intellect, in the other the character of the poet is poorly away. ”As a Gretchen question about the“ Römer-Oden ”resp. You could raise your author as an example: how do you hold it with c. 3.2.13? (“Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori”: sweet and honorable to die for the fatherland.)

Römeruden – Wikipedia

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta