[{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/kompromiss-wikipedia-wikipedia\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/kompromiss-wikipedia-wikipedia\/","headline":"KomPromiss \u2013 Wikipedia Wikipedia","name":"KomPromiss \u2013 Wikipedia Wikipedia","description":"before-content-x4 A Compromise is the solution to a conflict through mutual voluntary agreement, with mutual waiver of parts of the","datePublished":"2017-08-28","dateModified":"2017-08-28","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/author\/lordneo\/#Person","name":"lordneo","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/author\/lordneo\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44a4cee54c4c053e967fe3e7d054edd4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44a4cee54c4c053e967fe3e7d054edd4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/b\/b7\/Qsicon_Quelle.svg\/24px-Qsicon_Quelle.svg.png","url":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/b\/b7\/Qsicon_Quelle.svg\/24px-Qsicon_Quelle.svg.png","height":"24","width":"24"},"url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/kompromiss-wikipedia-wikipedia\/","wordCount":2390,"articleBody":"     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});before-content-x4A Compromise is the solution to a conflict through mutual voluntary agreement, with mutual waiver of parts of the claims made. The negotiating partners approach each other. They leave their own position and move to a new common position. The goal is a common result that they agree on. The compromise is a reasonable way to compensate for contradictory interests (dissent management). He lives from the respect of the opposing positions and belongs to the nature of democracy. Many areas of life of people can affect compromises.        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4The expression already occupied by Cicero compromise comes from the Latin legal language and meant there that the disputes “promise together” (promise together “( com-promise ) to submit to the arbitration saying of a third party previously called as a referee. A party that does not recognize the arbitration afterwards loses a previously stored deposit amount of money. [first] In the legal language of the Middle Ages, an amicable agreement in a legal dispute was referred to as a mutso. There is always a conflict between different wishes, interests and needs behind a compromise. There are usually conflicts between different people. But sometimes also inside a person (“two souls in my chest”), or between groups, organizations, states, cultures or religions. Often supposed contradictions and the resulting conflicts are only a result of misunderstandings. And often behind a wish or interest is a hidden and much more important need. If a misunderstanding is dissolved or the actual need behind the superficial interest, there is no longer a conflict.        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Some conflicts are distribution conflicts, such as raw materials, corporate profit, content, living space, etc. Such conflicts are often falsely regarded as a zero -sum game: If one of the two gets one euro more, the other automatically receives one euro less. But maybe one euro for some is a whole meal, and only a fraction of it for others. Even more complex relationships are often viewed incorrectly as a zero -sum game and are therefore mostly insoluble. Most zero -sum games, on the other hand, dissolve when they are viewed in greater context. A compromise can be closed if neither of the two sides has enough strength to pursue your own goals consistently and completely. Or if the full enforcement of the interests of a page is not a permanent solution. So if there is fear that the solution will be questioned again and again and is therefore not stable or can only be maintained under very high costs on the part of the winner, then a compromise is better than “victory and defeat”. A compromise can also be the result of a situation in which a page could prevail and maintain this result, but in addition to the goal to which the compromise relates to, there are other conflicting goals. An example: Land A wants 1. Political rule over land B and 2. Financial means of Land B. Even if Land A is able to master land B completely and, if necessary, permanently, this could be less satisfied and thus less productivity in land B lead, which would result in reduced tax revenue from the dominated country B (weighing up the opportunities). In addition to hard numbers (for example money, goods), social and political factors can also play a role. For example, when locking a compromise, both sides can feel that they are “face” – the opponent and\/or third parties.        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Table of ContentsJurisprudence [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Business [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Political [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Win-Win [ Edit | Edit the source text ] consensus [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Lazy compromise [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Formula compromise [ Edit | Edit the source text ] victory and defeat [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Earlier perspectives in Germany [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Compromising [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Jurisprudence [ Edit | Edit the source text ] In judicial proceedings, the parties to the dispute often make a compromise in the form of a legal comparison. This can result from direct negotiations of the opponents or proposed by the court. For example, if it is foreseeable that one loses, but so that the problem is not solved, or if it is unclear who loses, but it is clear that the problem is not solved either way. The compromise should therefore prevent the escalation of the conflict, since the possible costs of a defeat are evaluated higher than the disadvantages caused by the compromise. In the mediation, on the other hand, the opponents work together a solution in which both win and no one loses. The aim is that you can pay attention to each other again. A compromise is rather not part of mediation. Business [ Edit | Edit the source text ] The collective bargaining between employers and employees are an annual example of a compromise: the wage increases agreed at the end are usually between what the employees initially demanded and what the employers initially offered. Sometimes non -fulfilled wage claims are compensated for by other improvements (vacation, working hours reduction, participation). Overtime can also be a compromise if you bring a financial surcharge to the employee and the total working time is compensated for over the year. Cooperation: A company offers its neighboring company to buy a system together. That saves 20,000 euros. If both are in the same situation, it is advisable to share the savings in half. However, various reasons can lead to the fact that something else is agreed as a good compromise. Political [ Edit | Edit the source text ] In democratic states, but also in state allies or in the intergovernmental area, compromises between political and economic decision -makers are often closed. B. for fighting or securing social standards (such as the respective subsistence level) or about entrepreneurial interests (for example, profits, tariffs, taxes, tariffs and taxes). Compromises can also be made in the regulation apparently strictly contrary international law positions, such as between two states or within a state to solve conflicts, wars or civil wars, “frozen” clashes, etc. Most of the time, e.g. B.: On the one hand to maintain the territorial integrity of a state recognized under international law and On the other hand, to meet the principle of doing the self -expression of a population minority. As a possible standard compromise, such cases are part of a partial autonomy. However, whether a corresponding compromise will be received and how long it lasts depends on the framework conditions. These can change. Win-Win [ Edit | Edit the source text ] The disputes do not always have to give up demands. A higher form of conflict resolution, when the compromise is, is the win-win solution, in which both conflict parties not only get what they want, but something beyond. For example, by pursuing a common goal together or adequately pursuing each other. Or by giving each other acceptance, recognition and appreciation and putting the relationship to each other in the foreground and finding solutions together that they had never thought of before. consensus [ Edit | Edit the source text ] The consensus is a common agreement that takes the needs of the parties into account significantly more than a compromise can do. A consensus dissolves contradictions, including hidden, or he names the points that are still open and not yet dissolved on consensus. Lazy compromise [ Edit | Edit the source text ] A “lazy compromise” is a variant in which a compromise was apparently achieved – but in truth, a party has drawn the loser, and this was not noticed or is turned under the table. Or where you have agreed on the smallest common denominator and both lose both. It is not uncommon for a lack of advantages or corresponding disadvantages to be seen later and then make renegotiations necessary. Formula compromise [ Edit | Edit the source text ] A formula compromise is an agreement that each of the arguments in the agreement (the formula -descriptive formula) has accommodated their view of things or their interests. The conflict remains unresolved without one of the parties or both being able to be considered a loser. Formula compromises sometimes have the meaning of moving a real agreement to later (dilatory formula compromise) or delegating the decision to those institutions that are responsible for the interpretation and application of the agreement (delegating formula compromise). The parties in parliament often agree on a law that contains a formula compromise instead of a clear regulation. If a party relies on this law in a legal dispute, the case law must decide by interpreting the formula, which the legislature probably wanted for the individual case. Art. 15 C of Directive 2004\/83\/EC of April 29, 2004 provides an impressive example of minimum standards for the recognition and status of third -country or state -free or stateless as refugees etc. . September 2004) and the judgment of the European Communities of February 17, 2009-Case C-465\/07-(ELGAFAJI), ABF EU No. C 90\/4 v. April 18, 2009. victory and defeat [ Edit | Edit the source text ] It would not be a solution if the stronger enforced its will at the expense of the weaker. Depending on the cultural or linguistic background, the meaning of the word “compromise” and expectations can vary. In England, Ireland and the Commonwealth states, the word means compromise Something good: you consider an agreement, a compromise, as something positive that benefits from both sides. In the United States, on the other hand, this term means a solution in which both sides lose. (See intercultural competence.) Earlier perspectives in Germany [ Edit | Edit the source text ] The compromise was previously branded as a “Undeutsch”. According to names or words such as “the lazy compromise”, “the punching of the Gordian knot”, “do not let yourself be compromised; You lose the fact, this is certain! “Or” I stand here, I can’t help it “is the compromise for a thing for undecided, weaklings or unclear. There was a supposed heroism of uncompromising, the hardness, the enforcement power. Character was supposedly shown in persuasion faithfully and principles. [2] In contrast, the Danube monarchy or the Habsburg idea with its principle of \u201cletting life and living and living!\u201d [3] Compromising [ Edit | Edit the source text ] In cryptology, the word “compromise” is used with a different meaning. Here it denotes exposure (Blamage) A poorly encrypted message, i.e. a secret text that often allows his break (decipher) of the content or even the laid of the underlying cryptographic procedure. From the perspective of (Christian) ethics, concrete action must be based on the ethical values \u200b\u200bas well as on the other real possibilities and the real requirements of the other. In the event of concrete decisions, a compromise is often required: \u201cSeney is not weakness, but an expression of social responsibility; It is a required basic attitude or virtue to be practiced. ” [4] This article or subsequent section is not sufficiently equipped with supports (e.g. individual notices). Information without sufficient evidence could soon be removed. Please help Wikipedia by researching the information and Insert good evidence. While the compromise is looking for a middle ground between two opposing goals or characteristics, the trade-off strives for one of the goals or characteristics by weighing up. \u2191  Lemma compromise im Georges  \u2191  See Heribert Prantl: A high on the compromise. in S\u00fcddeutsche Zeitung of April 3, 2016.  \u2191  See detailed: William M. Johnston: On the cultural history of Austria and Hungary 1890-1938. 2015, S.\u00a046\u00a0ff.  \u2191  Johannes Gr\u00fcndel: Ethos\/Moral. In: Christian Sch\u00fctz (ed.): Practical lexicon of spirituality. Herder, Freiburg I.br. u. a. 1992, ISBN 3-451-22614-6, SP. 347 (349).       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4"},{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/kompromiss-wikipedia-wikipedia\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"KomPromiss \u2013 Wikipedia Wikipedia"}}]}]