[{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/konrad-schott-von-schottenstein-wikipedia\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/konrad-schott-von-schottenstein-wikipedia\/","headline":"Konrad Schott von Schottenstein – Wikipedia","name":"Konrad Schott von Schottenstein – Wikipedia","description":"before-content-x4 Konrad Schott von Schottenstein (\u2020 January 8, 1526) was the Margrave of Streitberg, based at Burg Streitberg. He was","datePublished":"2021-03-28","dateModified":"2021-03-28","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/author\/lordneo\/#Person","name":"lordneo","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/author\/lordneo\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44a4cee54c4c053e967fe3e7d054edd4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44a4cee54c4c053e967fe3e7d054edd4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/3\/33\/Schottsiebmacher.JPG\/220px-Schottsiebmacher.JPG","url":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/3\/33\/Schottsiebmacher.JPG\/220px-Schottsiebmacher.JPG","height":"280","width":"220"},"url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/konrad-schott-von-schottenstein-wikipedia\/","wordCount":3365,"articleBody":"     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});before-content-x4Konrad Schott von Schottenstein (\u2020 January 8, 1526) was the Margrave of Streitberg, based at Burg Streitberg. He was in contact with G\u00f6tz von Berlichingen and Hans Thomas von Absberg. Schott may have served as a model for the well -known stitch “Knight, Death and Devil” by Albrecht D\u00fcrer.         (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Konrad Schott von Schottenstein was also referred to as “Conz” or “Cunz”. A shortening of his last name is “Schott”. He himself signed letters with “Konrat Schott”. The family of the Scot von Schottenstein was an old, rich, Franconian knighthood. [first] The eponymous headquarters Schottenstein is now part of the municipality of Itzgrund in the Upper Franconian district of Coburg. His father Lutz was a bailiff on the Ablankenberg (see Frankenberg Castle) until this seat was destroyed in 1462. In 1464 he acquired Hornberg Castle from the Diocese of Speyer. Conz has probably grew up on the Auffankenberg. He married Dorothea von Absberg, whose family Vorderfrankenberg lived in. It is documented for the first time at Hornberg Castle. When his father had to leave the Hornberg, the family moved into an official seat in Lichtenfels. Table of Contents       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Low -wing knighthood and robber knightry [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Konrad and Wilwolt von Schaumberg [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Ganerbenburg Rothenberg [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Fehde against the Palatinate Count Philipp [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Expansion of Hornberg Castle [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Dealing with Count Reinhard von Hanau-M\u00fcnzenberg [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Sale of Hornberg Castle to G\u00f6tz von Berlichingen [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Konrad as the Margravial bailiff of Streitberg [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Criminal expedition of the Swabian Confederation in 1523 [ Edit | Edit the source text ] End of life [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Low -wing knighthood and robber knightry [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Because of the cruelty he has committed, he was considered his contemporaries as a “fleshly man” and was often adorned with titles such as “particularly wild society, extremely malignant, torp and brazen”. Helgard Ulmschneider even considers him “one of the pillars of the Franconian hedge riding”. Konrad Schott and G\u00f6tz von Berlichingen got to know each other at a young age and were initially friends. In 1504, both persecuted a group of riders in the Spessart – in vain – because “Mr. Scot of the Palatinate Count of Enemy wanted to become”, but “he was a lazy rider”. In the course of the Nuremberg Fehde 1512, an unsuccessful appearance of the Berliching property by Konrad Schott is known to save it from an imperial mandate.  Several years after 1469, when Georg von Rosenberg had committed the Reichsstadt Hall, Konrad went to him for advice. The city had destroyed Maienfels Castle, where his father had a Ganerb content. Rosenberg replied to him for advice on whether he should command reward. Ime his eyssin, whom he quarreled in Irish, was not covered by the vonn Hall. … so Mr. Conradt Schott stale from his venue \u201d. [2] To what extent the hustle and bustle of Konrad Schott was actually as reprehensible as shown over centuries is at least doubtful. At that time, the imperial knighthood was very difficult to keep its status and to assert itself economically. On the one hand, it was hardly needed by the emperor, on the other hand, the sovereigns were bothered by the imperial knighthoods. In addition, the imperial knights were increasingly in the economic and educational disadvantage towards the emerging urban bourgeoisie and increasingly in bitter hostility, including Because of the holding of the imperial knights on their last remaining significant privilege, the right to the feud. Ultimately, the deeds of Konrad and G\u00f6tz should hardly have differed. Only G\u00f6tz had the opportunity to dictate and transfer his biography, which gave Goethe historically extremely inaccurate and thus helped him world fame. On the other hand, our current view of Konrad is mainly shaped by the bourgeois propaganda (“robber knight”) against noble imperial knights.        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Konrad and Wilwolt von Schaumberg [ Edit | Edit the source text ] In the “stories and actions of Wilwolt von Schaumberg” you can find out that in a bloody feud between the two families Schott and Schaumberg Wilwolt and his people once thrown down Konrad and “left it to be dead”. Since this meeting he is said to have carried away a lifelong scar on his face. In turn, Konrad in turn ambushed Wilwolt von Schaumberg and captured it. He tried to defend this inglorious act for which the Reichsacht was imposed on him in 1485. But his attempted justification failed and he had no friends. Konrad, in order to escape the Reichsacht and the associated intensive persecution against it, finally have to leave the Wilwolt free without linking further conditions. Ganerbenburg Rothenberg [ Edit | Edit the source text ] In 1492 Konrad and his cousin Veit were lodged with Hellingen, which his nephew Hans had probably only expanded into a water castle in 1515. In 1497, 44 Ganerben of the Ganerbenburg Rothenberg from Franconian knight families Konrad Schott chose their burgrave. [3] From there you could reach the imperial city of Nuremberg within three hours. The mighty city was unable to ever conquer the Rothenberg. In 1499 there was an extremely violent and very bloody feud between Konrad and the city of Nuremberg. [4] Despite its interventions at the Kaiserhof, the city ultimately remained as a loser. The feud was formally settled, but Schott’s helpers continued against a largely pushing city that held its predicament. Konrad, however, concluded a service contract with the margrave of Brandenburg Friedrich in 1501 after the performance of a primal feud. In the Landshut War of Succession from 1504, Konrad and the city of Nuremberg fought together on the imperial side. Because of his merits in this war, he was knighted. Konrad again got disputes with the city of Nuremberg. The city allegedly withheld his share in the war prey. The city initially did not want to go into his demands. In a comparison mediated by the Bishop Lorenz of Bibra in W\u00fcrzburg, Willibald Pirckheimer, as a negotiator of the city, finally had to allow him compensation of 600 guilders. Fehde against the Palatinate Count Philipp [ Edit | Edit the source text ] As early as 1504, Konrad explained to the Palatinate Count PhilippBecause of the Hornberg, once withdrawn to the family, the feud. The Palatinate Count ensured that the emperor again imposed the eight via Konrad, but the Palatinate Count in no way helped. Konrad succeeded this year, the two castles Hornberg (the victorious) militarily lost in 1474 by his father Lutz von Schottenstein and in 1474 to Palatinate Count Friedrich I. Duo Castra horimberch ) to recapture with friends (60 riders). After the reconquest, a legal dispute with the Palatinate Count, who tried to defend himself on the right. But Konrad won in both instances. In the latter (May 27, 1505 in En\u00dfisheim by chairman Ritter Hans Imber von Gilgenberg), he was even granted a compensation of 1300 Rheinische guilders to be paid by the Palatinate Countal for the fact that they had long taken up and wrestled the legal Schottsch family ownership. So Konrad came to the aid of the Palatinate Count’s defeat in the War of Succession Landshut.  Palas built by Konrad Schott around 1510 to Hornberg Castle, which replaced a previous building. Expansion of Hornberg Castle [ Edit | Edit the source text ] With the compensation, Konrad Schott developed a lively construction activity on Hornberg. A new palace was created and the union of the two castles through a mighty surrounding wall to Hornberg Castle was completed. In 1512 the paternal leash was converted into a man’s loan; Konrad was laid with Hornberg Castle. His new employer was now Duke Ulrich von W\u00fcrttemberg, at the wedding of which he gave up with many other nobles. Dealing with Count Reinhard von Hanau-M\u00fcnzenberg [ Edit | Edit the source text ] The W\u00fcrttemberg Yearbook for Statistics and Regional Studies reports that on December 12, 1507 in the second hour of the night “Mr. Konrad Schott with a noticeable amount to Ro\u00df and foot” on “without knowing where he wanted”. On Tuesday (Tuesday to St. Luci\u00e4, December 14th), the Obervogt wrote that it was a “depreciation” that “had been heard to Langenburg and in other places”. In 1511 there was a mistake between Konrad Schott and Reinhard IV of Hanau-M\u00fcnzenberg. For unknown reasons, Konrad announced his entitlement to the district office at Burg Schwarzenfels between Spessart and Rh\u00f6n. The placement of the Neithart von Th\u00fcngen on Sodenberg and Count Michael von Wertheim came to a comparison. Konrad received a compensation of 300 guilders and had to offer the count to the count for the next four years. At the knight’s day in September 1515 in Windsheim, a letter from the Palatine Count was read out. In it he announced that the (just) Destinuations of the Konrad Schott had been \u201calready his knowledge\u201d. After negotiating the matter of Stephan von Venningen in Heidelberg, he was thrown down while riding. Since he was a fiefdom of the cathedral pencil in Speyer, the incident was dealt with there in March 1515. [5] Sale of Hornberg Castle to G\u00f6tz von Berlichingen [ Edit | Edit the source text ]  G\u00f6tzen’s purchase letter about Hornberg Castle Konrad Schott sold Hornberg Castle to G\u00f6tz von Berlichingen on Easter Sunday, April 13, 1517. This paid 4000 guilders immediately and was supposed to pay 2500 guilders at Petri chair celebration, including interest, a year later. In the meantime, however, G\u00f6tz agreed to the Palatinate Count to take over whose feud that he had just explained against Konrad Schott (1518). Konrad had had his follow -up man Georg R\u00fcdt from B\u00f6digheim captured on his journey home when he had charged his father’s guilt at Konrad. The takeover of this feud was blamed quite a bit within the Franconian knighthood. G\u00f6tz narrowly escaped the capture by Konrad twice: once when the last buying rate of 2500 guilders to Konrad’s wife Dorothea, born of Absberg, in Schweinfurt – G\u00f6tz had been warned, and so he escaped through the only city gate through the only from Konrad’s H\u00e4schern -, the other time in his failed attempt to capture Konrad at Marktbergel with inferior forces. Finally, G\u00f6tz, the Veit Schott, the owner of the Wasserburg Eichelsdorf near Hofheim in Lower Franconia, succeeded. However, Veit Schott was not a close related Konrads.  Konrad as the Margravial bailiff of Streitberg [ Edit | Edit the source text ] Konrad Schott, who has held the M\u00f6ckm\u00fchl office at least since 1512, has now become an official of the Margrave of Brandenburg Kasimir on the Streitberg near Forchheim. The awarding of the office may be related to Konrad’s money loan to the Margrave of 10,000 guilders. Criminal expedition of the Swabian Confederation in 1523 [ Edit | Edit the source text ] In the summer of 1523, the war of the Swabian covenant passed by Franconia in the summer of 1523, in which 23 “robbery testers” were laid down (see hiking iron wood cuts from 1523). The aim of the federal government was to destroy the castles, which Hans Thomas von Absberg supported. Because around 1519 his brother -in -law Hans Thomas von Absberg had often been with him as a “hands -hacker”, Konrad himself was suspected. He tried to free himself by finally refusing his brother -in -law. Konrad had been able to purging (cleaning). Nevertheless, there was a small incident when a country servant fished in his fish box. He fired a shot at him and then put it in iron. This occurrence resulted in a negotiation with a negotiator from the city of Nuremberg. Despite the tense situation, however, the conflict was not escalated. [6] End of life [ Edit | Edit the source text ] In 1525 Konrad Schott complained to Margrave Kasimir because he had not been called against the farmers for the war.; He wanted to know whether this was done out of grace or out of favor. He couldn’t come himself because he was weak, but he could send his cousin, who is currently present. At the end of 1525, he went to the Heilsbronner Hof in Nuremberg, an exemplary Margravial area within the city. There he died on January 8, 1526. His armor came to the Nuremberg Zeughaus and was later bought from the Counts of Erbach during the phase of secularization, which she is said to have been handed over with a guideline by around 1930, in her, in her Exhibited the castle. Then the armor was sold overseas. Due to Konrad Schotts at the Nuremberg Councilor Wilhelm Derrer, cruelty committed and because of Stein’s low burning near Nuremberg, in which the dead were mocked with arrows, on which stand “in one from Nuremberg”, a propaganda battle started. A hate poem directed against him wished him death on the bike (liliecron). It may have been this generally caused atmosphere, which led to legend that Konrad Schott was ordered in 1523 when the Swabian federal government’s revenge campaign was ordered to Cadolzburg. The scene at the Margrave reports that he should have said “It is better to die than that my poor people are ruining, whereupon he kneel down and gave up his head.” [7] This is refuted as legend through later written certificates. Nevertheless, it is persistently persistent to this day. He is also said to have attacked and robbed a Nuremberg merchant who is said to have run the works by the artist Albrecht D\u00fcrer with him to sell them at the fair in Frankfurt. [8] He is also said to have been sitting on the rain as a robber knight on the “Bierpanscherburg” of Stockenfels. This castle was only bought together with Fischbach Castle around 1560 by Hans Schott, a son of his nephew Hans Schott zu Hellingen. The grandson Hans-Konrad Schott sold-probably for economic reasons, because he had 18 children-Stockenfels Castle in 1617 to Count Dohna. Friedrich Wolfgang G\u00f6tz Graf von Berlichingen-Rossach: History of the knight G\u00f6tz von Berlichingen with the Iron Hand and his family . Brockhaus, Leipzig 1861. G\u00f6tz von Berlichingen: Buy contract of Hornberg Castle 1517 . Archive Burg Hornberg, Neckarzimmern. Joseph Heller: Message about the knight and captain to Streitberg Conrad Schott . In: Archive for history and antiquity from Upper Franconia . 1. Band 2. Heft. Bayreuth 1840. S. 116\u2013118. Hans Open: 1200 years of Neckarzimmern . Self -published municipality of Neckarzimmern, 1973. Fr. Krieger: Die Burg Hornberg am Neckar . Heidelberg 1869. \u2191  As with many other families, the genealogy by Johann Gottfried Biedermann is also not reliable in detail at the Schott von Schottenstein  \u2191  Christian Kolb: Herolts Chronica , Edited by the W\u00fcrttemberg Commission for State History, p. 164  \u2191  Johannes M\u00fcllner: The annals of the Reichsstadt Nuremberg from 1623, Part II: from 1351 to 1469 . N\u00fcrnberg 1972. S.\u00a034.  \u2191  Martin Sch\u00fctz: Die Ganerbschaft Rothenberg . N\u00fcrnberg 1924. 9F.  \u2191  The protocols of the Speyer cathedral chapter , S. 405  \u2191  Peter Ritzmann: Landing Plackerey in German . Dissertation publisher NG copy shop. Munich 1995, ISBN 3-928536-50-8. Pp. 333\u2013335.  \u2191  Schott or Scotsman, an ancient noble family. In: Johann Heinrich Zedler: Large full universal lexicon of all scientific and arts. Volume 35, Leipzig 1743, col. 1031 f.  \u2191  Hans Frank, Westf\u00e4lische Zeitung 1957       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4"},{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki14\/konrad-schott-von-schottenstein-wikipedia\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Konrad Schott von Schottenstein – Wikipedia"}}]}]