[{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki32\/commission-on-the-political-and-constitutional-future-of-quebec-wikipedia\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki32\/commission-on-the-political-and-constitutional-future-of-quebec-wikipedia\/","headline":"Commission on the political and constitutional future of Quebec – Wikipedia","name":"Commission on the political and constitutional future of Quebec – Wikipedia","description":"before-content-x4 A wikipedia article, free l’encyclop\u00e9i. after-content-x4 The Commission on the political and constitutional future of Quebec , often designated","datePublished":"2020-08-25","dateModified":"2020-08-25","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki32\/author\/lordneo\/#Person","name":"lordneo","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki32\/author\/lordneo\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44a4cee54c4c053e967fe3e7d054edd4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/44a4cee54c4c053e967fe3e7d054edd4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/fr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:CentralAutoLogin\/start?type=1x1","url":"https:\/\/fr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:CentralAutoLogin\/start?type=1x1","height":"1","width":"1"},"url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki32\/commission-on-the-political-and-constitutional-future-of-quebec-wikipedia\/","wordCount":1226,"articleBody":"     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});before-content-x4A wikipedia article, free l’encyclop\u00e9i.        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4The Commission on the political and constitutional future of Quebec , often designated as the B\u00e9langer-Campeau Commission , was established by the Quebec National Assembly on the initiative of Prime Minister Robert Bourassa, after the rejection of the Agreement of Lake Meech. The mandate is to “study and analyze the political and constitutional status of Quebec and to formulate, in this regard, recommendations” in the National Assembly. It was chaired by Michel B\u00e9langer and Jean Campeau. In total, the Commission received more than 600 memoirs, accessed 35 specialists and heard 235 groups. The majority of memories considered Quebec’s independence as a better solution to the conflict [ first ] .        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4The B\u00e9langer-Campeau report was deposited the 27 mars 1991 and revised in 2002. He recommended hold a referendum on sovereignty-association in October 1992. The work of the commission will lead to adoption, in June 1991 , to the adoption of the law on the process of determining the political and constitutional future of Quebec.   Composed of 37 members, the B\u00e9langer-Campeau commission was not made up of Quebec parliamentarians, which is use for a parliamentary commission, but also included four people from the union community, four from the business community, one from the world cooperative, one of teaching, one of culture and two of the municipal world. Three deputies from the Federal Parliament also sat on the Commission.        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Table of ContentsCo -presidents [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Deputies of the Quebec National Assembly [ modifier | Modifier and code ] MEPs of the Chamber of Commons of Canada [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Other commissioners [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Recommendations [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Related articles [ modifier | Modifier and code ] external links [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Co -presidents [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Deputies of the Quebec National Assembly [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Quebec Liberal Party: Parti Quebecois: Equality party: Richard Holden Robert Libman (could participate in the sessions of the Commission but had neither the right to vote nor the right to make proposals) MEPs of the Chamber of Commons of Canada [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Other commissioners [ modifier | Modifier and code ] Union environment: Business environment: Cooperative environment: Municipal elected officials: Culture: Education: What are the main problems facing Quebec with regard to its political and constitutional status? What are the areas where Quebec could and should enjoy, first, full competence and where, secondly, of competing or shared competence? Explain the implications of your answer to the previous question on the maintenance and promotion of Quebec identity. Explain the implications of your answer to the second question on the maintenance and promotion of the standard of living of Quebecers taking into account economic, commercial, tax, financial and monetary aspects. In the case of shared skills, explain with which partners, singular and plural. In the case of shared skills, what are the institutions and arbitration mechanisms that should be privileged? And say why. What are the implications of your answers to previous questions, with regard to Quebec’s political and constitutional status? What are the main historical experiences of economic integration and interdependence and political affirmation relevant to Quebec? What lesson do you learn from it? The Report of the B\u00e9langer-Campeau Commission was deposited on 27 mars 1991 . It was signed by 29 of the 32 commissioners, that is to say all except Jean-Pierre Hogue and Andr\u00e9 Ouellet, respectively conservative and liberal deputies in Ottawa, as well as Richard Holden, deputy of the Equality Party. In addition, 13 signatories expressed reservations or dissent to the main conclusions of the report while 12 others wanted to comment on the Addendum report. Although the majority of participants in the Commission maintained a sovereignist position, the lack of vigor of the recommendations of the Commission is partly explained by its composition which tended to swing the contents of the federalist and sovereignist currents [ first ] . Recommendations [ modifier | Modifier and code ] The Commission recommends in the National Assembly the adoption in the spring of 1991 of a law establishing the process of determining the political and constitutional future of Quebec. The law would contain three (3) sections: a) Preamble b) Part 1: hold of a referendum on Quebec sovereignty c) Part 2: Offer for a new partnership of a constitutional nature Related articles [ modifier | Modifier and code ] external links [ modifier | Modifier and code ]        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4"},{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki32\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/all2en\/wiki32\/commission-on-the-political-and-constitutional-future-of-quebec-wikipedia\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Commission on the political and constitutional future of Quebec – Wikipedia"}}]}]