Conantokin – Wikipedia Wikipedia

before-content-x4

Conantokins are a small family of helical peptides that are derived from the venom of predatory marine snails of the genus Conus . Conantokins act as potent and specific antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR). [first] They are the only naturally-derived peptides to do so. [2] The subtypes of conantokins exhibit a surprising variability of selectivity across the NMDAR subunits, and are therefore uniquely useful in developing subunit-specific pharmacological probes. [3] [4] [5]

after-content-x4

Chemically, conantokins are unique in that they possess a number (generally 4 or 5) of gamma-carboxyglutamyl (Gla) residues, generated by the post-translational modification of glutamyl (Glu) residues. These Gla residues induce a conformational change from a 3 10 helix to an alpha helix on binding to Calcium. [6] In the broader scheme of genetic conotoxin classification, Conanotokins are also known as “Conotoxin Superfamily B.” [7]

The word “conantokin” is derived from the Filipino word antokin , meaning sleepy. [8]

Subtypes [ edit ]

Conantokin are in general named after the specific epithet of the Conus species it is found in, using single-letter abbreviations if possible. A conantokin from Conus radiant is called Conantokin-R, but the latter-discovered ones from Conus rolani are called Canontokin-Rl. If a species makes multiple conantokins, numbers or letters are suffixed to the names. The abbreviation for “Conantokin” in these names is always “Con”.

Conantokin-G [ edit ]

Also known as the “sleeper peptide” [9] or CGX-1007, [ten] Curved ( P07231 ) is a small peptide isolated from the fish-hunting snail, Conus geographus . It is the best-characterized conantokin, and acts as a functional inhibitor of NMDAR. [11]

Con-G shows potential as a neuroprotective agent in ischemic and excitotoxic brain injury, neuronal apoptosis, pain, epilepsy, and as a research tool in drug addiction and Alzheimer’s disease. [11] [twelfth] Con-G blocks NMDAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Con-G reduces the strength of excitotoxic intracellular Ca 2+ actions and blocks different neuronal injuries in vitro. [ten] In certain injuries Con-G shows an exceptional prolongation of the therapeutic window. [ten] Con-G can reverse established allodynia and can also fully reverse thermal hypersensitivity induced by nerve injury. [4]

after-content-x4

Conantokin-T [ edit ]

Con-T P17684 ) is purified from the venom of the fish-hunting cone-snail, Conus came . This peptide has 4 residues of Gla. Con-T acts by inhibiting NMDAR-mediated Ca 2+ influx in neurons in the central nervous system. [8]

Conantokin-R and -L [ edit ]

Con-R ( P58806 ) is a highly potent anticonvulsant compound, derived from Conus radiant .

Con-L P69745 ) is an efficient anticonvulsant compound, derived from Cone lynceus . [5] It differs from Con-R mainly in the C-terminal amino acids and, like Con-R, it induces sleep-like symptoms in young mice, with faster onset and for a longer duration. [5]

Con-L blocks NMDA-evoked currents in a powerful way, which is only slowly reversible upon washout, similar to Con-R and Con-G. [5]

Conantokin-Pr1, -Pr2 and –Pr3 [ edit ]

Each peptide in this group is derived from the same species, Conus parius . CON-PR3 ( P0C8E2 ) has three different post-translational modifications. Con-Pr1 ( P0C8E0 ) and –Pr2 ( P0C8E1 ) adopt α-helical conformations in the presence of Mg 2+ and Ca 2+ , but otherwise are generally unstructured. Conantokin-Pr3 always adopts an α-helical conformation. [twelfth]

These peptides have highest potency for the NR2B subunits of the NMDAR. [twelfth]

Conantokin-P and -E [ edit ]

Con-P ( P0C8E3 ) and Con-E ( P0C8D9 ) were isolated from the only two fish-hunting cone snails of the Americas ( Conus purpurascens and Conus ermineus , respectively). Con-P differs from the other known conantokins in that it contains a long disulfide loop with two Gla residues. It is less helical (estimated 44% helical content), but unlike con-G, it does not require calcium for stability of this structure. Another notable distinction is the increased discrimination for NR2B. Con-E is very similar in structure to Con-P, and is likely to have a similar function. [first]

Conantokin-Rl-A [ edit ]

Con-Rl-A ( P0dky9 ), derived from the venom of Conus rolani , is unique among the conantokins in having two distinct conformational states between which it equilibriates. Like Con-P and Con-E, its helical structure (estimated at 50%) does not depend on the presence or absence of calcium. This is likely due to the fact that two of the five Gla residues present in con-G are replaced in con-Rl-A by Lys. Con-R1-A discriminates more effectively than any other known ligand between the NR2B and NR2C subunits of NMDAR. [13]

Conantokin-Br or -S1 [ edit ]

Con-Br (or Con-S1, P0CG46 ) is isolated from Conus Bretinghami (now Cone grooved ), and is the only known conantokin with a high selectivity for the NR2D subunit of NMDAR. [14]

Synthetic derivatives [ edit ]

Con-G-based [ edit ]

Con-G[γ7A] Con-G[γ7K] and Con-G[S16Y] are synthetic Con-G peptides, where the Gla residue at position 7 is replaced with an alanine or a lysine residue, or the serine at position 16 is replaced with a tyrosine residue, respectively. Con-G[γ7A] is fourfold more potent than the native peptide, Con-G, while Con-G[γ7K] is as potent as Con-G. [3] The first two peptides appear to distinguish NMDAR subtypes in mid-frontal gyri from those in superior temporal gyri in human brain tissue. Both of them are being researched in relation to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and all three evoked 100% inhibition of spermine-enhanced [ 3 H]MK-801 binding. [3] [15] Con-G[γ7K] and Con-G[S16Y] also show positive results in morphine withdrawal. [3]

Con-T-based [ edit ]

Con-T[K7γ] is a synthetic Con-T peptide, where the serine at position 7 is replaced with Gla residue. Like Con-G, it has higher affinity for Mg 2+ than for Ca 2+ , but does not dimerize in the presence of Mg 2+ . [16]

Chemistry [ edit ]

Biochemically, conantokins have a distinctive high γ-carboxyglutamate content and low cysteine content. Conantokins typically lack disulfide bonds, in contrast to most families of conotoxins, which have an unusually high density of disulfide cross-links.

The inhibition of NMDAR-mediated spontaneous EPSCs (sEPSCs) and NMDA-gated currents in cortical neurons might be a result of actions on both diheteromeric (NR1/NR2B) and triheteromeric (NR1/NR2A/NR2B) NMDAR.

Mode of action [ edit ]

Con-G does not act directly at the glycine binding site. [11] [17] It can attenuate both the amplitude and the decay time constant of NMDA-mediated EPSCs [18] and significantly and reversibly affect other different properties of NMDAR-mediated sEPSCs in cultured neurons. The effect of Con-G on the frequency of the sEPSCs most likely relates to antagonizing the NMDAR. [11]

Conantokins target NMDAR. Each subtype selectively targets different subunits of the receptor.

Toxicity [ edit ]

Some of these peptide effects are age-dependent, such as the induction of sleep-like state in young mice and hyperactive behavior in older mice. [3]

Intrathecal administration of doses greater than 300 pmol produced motor impairment in mice. [4]
Con-G, Con-R and Con-L cause behavioral toxicity at similar doses. Thus the difference in the C-terminal sequence might affect the anticonvulsant and behavioral toxicity profile. [5]

References [ edit ]

  1. ^ a b Gowd KH, Twede V, Watkins M, Krishnan KS, Teichert RW, Bulaj G, Olivera BM (August 2008). “Conantokin-P, an unusual conantokin with a long disulfide loop” . Toxicon . 52 (2): 203–13. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.04.178 . PMC  2630528 . PMID  18586049 .
  2. ^ Mena Yes, Gullak MF, Pagnozzi MJ, Richter Ke, Rivier J, Cruz LJ, Olivera BM (October 1990). “Conantokin-g: A Novel Peptide Antagonists to the N-Methyl-D-Aspartic Acid (NMDA) Receptor” Neuroscience Letters . 118 (2): 241–4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940 (90) 90637-O . PMID  2177176 . S2CID  32784480 .
  3. ^ a b c d It is Wei J, Dong M, Xiao C, Jiang F, Castellino FJ, Prorok M, Dai Q (September 2006). “Conantokins and variants derived from cone snail venom inhibit naloxone-induced withdrawal jumping in morphine-dependent mice”. Neuroscience Letters . 405 (1–2): 137–41. doi: 10.1016/J.neulet.2006.06.040 . PMID  16859831 . S2CID  35973753 .
  4. ^ a b c Malmberg AB, Gilbert H, McCabe RT, Basbaum AI (January 2003). “Powerful antinociceptive effects of the cone snail venom-derived subtype-selective NMDA receptor antagonists conantokins G and T”. Pain . 101 (1–2): 109–16. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00303-2 . PMID  12507705 . S2CID  25950992 .
  5. ^ a b c d It is Jimenez EC, Donevan S, Walker C, Zhou LM, Nielsen J, Cruz LJ, Armstrong H, White HS, Olivera BM (September 2002). “Conantokin-L, a new NMDA receptor antagonist: determinants for anticonvulsant potency”. Epilepsy Research . 51 (1–2): 73–80. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211 (02) 00101-8 . PMID  12350383 . S2CID  7960889 .
  6. ^ Rigby AC, Baleja JD, Li L, Pedersen LG, Furie BC, Furie B (December 1997). “Role of gamma-carboxyglutamic acid in the calcium-induced structural transition of conantokin G, a conotoxin from the marine snail Conus geographus”. Biochemistry . 36 (50): 15677–84. doi: 10.1021/bi9718550 . PMID  9398296 .
  7. ^ Robinson SD, Norton RS (December 2014). “Conotoxin gene superfamilies” . Marine Drugs . twelfth (12): 6058–101. doi: 10.3390/md12126058 . PMC  4278219 . PMID  25522317 .
  8. ^ a b Haack Ja, Rivier J, Parks TN, Mena ee, Cruz lj, Olivera BM (April 1990). “Conantokin-T. A gamma-carboxyglutamate containing peptide with N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist activity” . The Journal of Biological Chemistry . 265 (11): 6025–9. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258 (19) 39285-3 . PMID  2180939 .
  9. ^ Olivera BM, McIntosh JM, Clark C, Middlemas D, Gray WR, Cruz LJ (1985). “A sleep-inducing peptide from Conus geographus venom”. Toxicon . 23 (2): 277–82. doi: 10.1016/0041-011 (85) 90150-3 . PMID  4024137 .
  10. ^ a b c Williams AJ, Ling G, McCabe RT, Tortella FC (May 2002). “Intrathecal CGX-1007 is neuroprotective in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia”. NeuroReport . 13 (6): 821–4. doi: 10.1097/00001756-2005070-00017 . PMID  11997694 . S2CID  30052416 .
  11. ^ a b c d Alex AB, Baucum AJ, Wilcox KS (September 2006). “Effect of Conantokin G on NMDA receptor-mediated spontaneous EPSCs in cultured cortical neurons”. Journal of Neurophysiology . 96 (3): 1084–92. doi: 10.1152/jn.01325.2005 . PMID  16760339 .
  12. ^ a b c Teichert RW, Jimenez EC, Twede V, Watkins M, Hollmann M, Bulaj G, Olivera BM (December 2007). “Novel conantokins from Conus parius venom are specific antagonists of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors” . The Journal of Biological Chemistry . 282 (51): 36905–13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706611200 . PMID  17962189 .
  13. ^ Gowd KH, Watkins M, Twede VD, Bulaj GW, Oliver BM (August 2010). “Characterization of conantokin Rl-A: molecular phylogeny as structure/function study” . Journal of Peptide Science . 16 (8): 375–82. doi: 10.1002/psc.1249 . PMC  4136950 . PMID  20572027 .
  14. ^ Twede VD, Teichert RW, Walker CS, Gruszczyński P, Kaźmierkiewicz R, Bulaj G, Oliver BM (May 2009). “Conantokin-Br from Conus brettinghami and selectivity determinants for the NR2D subunit of the NMDA receptor” . Biochemistry . 48 (19): 4063–73. doi: 10.1021/bi802259a . PMC  3955384 . PMID  19309162 .
  15. ^
  16. ^ Cnudde SE, Prorok M, Castellino FJ, Geiger JH. (June 2010) “Metal ion determinants of conantokin dimerization as revealed in the X-ray crystallographic structure of the Cd(2+)/Mg (2+)-con-T[K7gamma] complex.” J Biol Inorg Chem.15(5):667-75. Inudde whether and prorok m, Castelline FJ, Gianne JH (June 2010). “Metal ion determinants of conantokin dimerization as revealed in the X-ray crystallographic structure of the Cd(2+)/Mg (2+)-con-T[K7gamma] complex” . Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry . 15 (5): 667–75. doi: 10.1007/S00775-0633-2 . PMC  3693470 . PMID  20195692 .
  17. ^ Donevan SD, McCabe RT (September 2000). “Conantokin G is an NR2B-selective competitive antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors”. Molecular Pharmacology . 58 (3): 614–23. doi: 10.1124/mol.58.3.614 . PMID  10953056 .
  18. ^ Huang L, Balsara RD, Sheng Z, Castellino FJ (October 2010). “Conantokins inhibit NMDAR-dependent calcium influx in developing rat hippocampal neurons in primary culture with resulting effects on CREB phosphorylation” . Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences . 45 (2): 163–72. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.06.007 . PMC  2923249 . PMID  20600930 .

External links [ edit ]

after-content-x4