Tuscan district (Senate of the Republic)
Tuscany electoral district |
|
---|---|
State | Italy |
Capital | Florence |
Elections for | Senate of the Republic |
Elected | Senators |
Institution | 1948 |
Period 1948-1993 | |
Type | list |
Period 1993-2005 | |
Type | to uninominal colleges |
Period 2005-2017 | |
Type | list |
Period 2017-2020 | |
Type | to uninominal and plurinominal colleges |
Elected number | 18 |
Period 2020- | |
Type | to uninominal and plurinominal colleges |
Elected number | twelfth |
The Tuscan district It is an Italian electoral district for the election of the Senate of the Republic.
The electoral district was established, with another 19, for the first elections of the Senate of the Republic, by law of February 6, 1948, n. 29 [first] in compliance with the establishment of the Italian Republic which prescribes, in art. 57, that “the Senate of the Republic is elected regional based”. It was divided into 15 list colleges, based on the Presidential Decree of 6 February 1948, n. 30. [2]
In compliance with the aforementioned article, the district was reconfirmed later in all the electoral laws inherent in the Senate of the Republic.
The law of 4 August 1993, n. 276 [3] changed the territory by dividing it into 14 uninominal colleges, based on Legislative Decree of 20 December 1993 n. 535. The aforementioned colleges were abolished by the law of 21 December 2005, n. 270. [4]
The current law 3 November 2017, n. 165, has recreated in the territory of the district uninominal colleges and plurinominal colleges that must be determined by the government by legislative decree. [5]
The territory of the district corresponds, from its institution, to that of the Tuscany Region.
For the attribution of the seats due to each region, it must also be compared in this case to the establishment of the Italian Republic which prescribed, on the date of promulgation of 1948, that “no region can have a number of senators less than six. The Aosta Valley has only one senator “, modified then with the constitutional law 9 February 1963, n. 2 which reads «no region can have a number of senators lower than seven; Molise has two, the Aosta Uno Valley. ”
Starting from a constitutional minimum of six seats by region, which later became seven, the distribution of the seats due to the district is carried out in proportion to the population of the regions, as it appears from the last general census, on the basis of the entire quotients and the highest remains.
Based on the law in force since 1948, essentially proportional, the parties presented a candidate for each college in each district. Within each college, the candidate who had reached the quorum of 65% of the preferences. If no candidate had achieved the election, the votes of all candidates were grouped on party lists at regional level, where the seats were allocated using the Metodo d’Hondtt Of the major statistical averages and therefore, within each list, candidates with the best preference percentages were elected senators.
Electoral colleges [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
And legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
2 Legislatura [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
3 Legislatura [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
IV legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
V Legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
6 legislatur [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
7 legislatur [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
8 legislatur [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
Ix legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
X Legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
XI Legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
No candidate in the uninominal colleges reached the quorum of 65% of the votes to be automatically elected; The seats were therefore assigned proportionally to the votes received.
|
With the 1993 majority electoral reform, in the first instance the candidate was elected Senator who had reported the relative majority of the suffrage in each college. No candidate could present himself in more than a college. The remaining regional seats were instead assigned by resembling the votes of all the uninominal losing candidates who had connected to a regional group, using the Metodo d’Hondtt Of the best averages: the ladders thus obtained by each group were assigned, within it, to the losing candidates who had obtained the best electoral percentages.
Electoral colleges [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
- North Florence
- Florence – Scandicci
- Sesto Fiorentino
- Empoli
- Dish
- Pistoia
- Arezzo
- Carrara
- Lucca
- Pisa
- Pontedera
- Siena
- Livorno
- Grosseto
XII Legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Electoral data [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
List |
Votes | % | Seats | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 109 333 | 49.12 | 14 | |||||||
396 807 | 17.57 | 2 | |||||||
343 828 | 15.22 | 2 | |||||||
280 133 | 12.40 | first | |||||||
84 462 | 3.74 | – | |||||||
Tuscan autonomist league |
30 636 | 1.36 | – | ||||||
Renovation |
6 075 | 0.27 | – | ||||||
Together for development |
5 504 | 0.24 | – | ||||||
Gervasi |
1 672 | 0.07 | – | ||||||
Total |
2 258 450 |
100 |
19 |
||||||
Unrealities votes |
169 690 |
6.99 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 428 140 |
90.36 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 687 210 |
||||||||
Data : 27-28 Marzo 1994 |
|||||||||
Elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Elected in progressives (PDS – PC – FDV – PSI – Network – AD – CS)
Elected in the pole of freedoms (fi – ln)
Elected in the pact for Italy (PPI – PS)
Elected to the National Alliance
College | Elected | Match | Quota | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 – North Florence | Stefano Passigli | AD (SR) | Magg. | |
Vittorio Cecchi Gori | PPI | Prop. | ||
2 – Florence – Scandicci | Graziano Cioni | PDS | Magg. | |
3 – Sesto Fiorentino | Enrico Falqui | FDV | Magg. | |
4 – Empoli | Paolo Bagnoli | PSI | Magg. | |
5 – | Anna MariaLoli | PDS | Magg. | |
6 – Pistoia | Antonio freshetti | PRC | Magg. | |
7 – Arezzo | Monica Bettoni Brandani | PDS | Magg. | |
8 – Carrara | Fausto Marchetti | PRC | Magg. | |
Gianfranco Petricca | BE | Prop. | ||
9 – Lucca | Patrice Giovanni | PDS | Magg. | |
Paolo Riani | BE | Prop. | ||
Mauro Favilla | PPI | Prop. | ||
10 – Pisa | Salvatore Senese | PDS | Magg. | |
11 – Pontedera | Umberto Carpi | PRC | Magg. | |
12 – Siena | Cosimo Scagloso | PDS | Magg. | |
13 – Livorno | Edda celebrate | PRC | Magg. | |
14 – Grosseto | Roberto Benvenuti | PDS | Magg. | |
Giuseppe type | AN | Prop. |
XIII Legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Electoral data [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
List |
Votes | % | Seats | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 130 461 | 50.75 | twelfth | |||||||
727 219 | 32.65 | 5 | |||||||
160 782 | 7.22 | 2 | |||||||
51 624 | 2.32 | – | |||||||
43 960 | 1.97 | – | |||||||
35 789 | 1.61 | – | |||||||
33 991 | 1.53 | – | |||||||
Clean hands |
24 870 | 1.12 | – | ||||||
Tuscan autonomist movement |
18 691 | 0.84 | – | ||||||
Total |
2 227 387 |
100 |
19 |
||||||
Unrealities votes |
161 791 |
6.77 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 389 178 |
87.82 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 720 385 |
||||||||
Data : April 21, 1996 |
|||||||||
Elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Eletti Nell’ulvo (PDS – P-P-U-P – RI – FDV)
Elected in progressives (PRC)
Elected in the pole for freedoms (FI – AN – CCD -CDU)
College | Elected | Match | Quota | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 – North Florence | Vittorio Cecchi Gori | PPI | Magg. | |
2 – Florence – Scandicci | Graziano Cioni | PDS | Magg. | |
3 – Sesto Fiorentino | Pino Arlacchi (until 1997) | PDS | Magg. | |
Antonio Di Pietro (since 1997) | Ind. | Magg. | ||
4 – Empoli | Stefano Boco | FDV | Magg. | |
5 – | Anna MariaLoli | PDS | Magg. | |
6 – Pistoia | Stefano Passigli | PDS (SR) | Magg. | |
Francesco Bosi | CCD | Prop. | ||
7 – Arezzo | Monica Bettoni Brandani | PDS | Magg. | |
Italo Marri | AN | Prop. | ||
8 – Carrara | Fausto Marchetti | PRC | Magg. | |
Massimo Baldini | BE | Prop. | ||
9 – Lucca | Patrice Giovanni | PDS | Magg. | |
Marcello Pera | BE | Prop. | ||
10 – Pisa | Umberto Carpi | PDS | Magg. | |
11 – Pontedera | Salvatore Senese | PDS | Magg. | |
12 – Siena | Franco Bassanini | PDS | Magg. | |
13 – Livorno | Ersilia saved | PRC | Magg. | |
14 – Grosseto | Ottaviano del Turco | AND | Magg. | |
Giuseppe type | AN | Prop. |
XIV Legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Electoral data [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
List |
Votes | % | Seats | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 198 380 | 52.04 | 13 | |||||||
819 401 | 35.58 | 5 | |||||||
149 258 | 6.48 | first | |||||||
50 963 | 2.21 | – | |||||||
42 649 | 1.85 | – | |||||||
39 364 | 1.71 | – | |||||||
Communism |
2 159 | 0.09 | – | ||||||
Tuscany Grand Duchy |
625 | 0.03 | – | ||||||
Total |
2 302 799 |
100 |
19 |
||||||
Unrealities votes |
103 603 |
4.31 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 406 402 |
86.33 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 787 422 |
||||||||
Data : May 13, 2001 |
|||||||||
Elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Elected in the olive tree (DS – DL – Il Girasole – Pdci)
Elected in the House of Liberty (FI – AN – CCD -CDU – NPSI)
Elected in the party of the Communist Refoundation
College | Elected | Match | Quota | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 – North Florence | Stefano Passigli | DS | Magg. | |
2 – Florence – Scandicci | Lamberto Dini | DL | Magg. | |
3 – Sesto Fiorentino | Franco victory | DS | Magg. | |
4 – Empoli | Stefano Boco | FDV | Magg. | |
5 – | Sauro turbones | FDV | Magg. | |
6 – Pistoia | Giorgio Tonini | DS | Magg. | |
Francesco Bosi | CCD | Prop. | ||
7 – Arezzo | Monica Bettoni Brandani | DS | Magg. | |
Grazia Sestini | BE | Prop. | ||
8 – Carrara | Andrea Rigoni | DL | Magg. | |
Massimo Baldini | BE | Prop. | ||
Giorgio Maletacchi | PRC | Prop. | ||
9 – Lucca | Marcello Pera | BE | Magg. | |
10 – Pisa | Luigi Berlinguer (until 2002) | DS | Magg. | |
Luciano Modica (since 2002) | DS | Magg. | ||
11 – Pontedera | Giovanni Brunale | DS | Magg. | |
12 – Siena | Franco Bassanini | DS | Magg. | |
13 – Livorno | Christmas D’Amico | DL | Magg. | |
14 – Grosseto | Giuliano Amato | Ind. | Magg. | |
Franco Mugnai | AN | Prop. |
With the entry into force of the Calderoli law, a proportional electoral system with blocked lists, barrier threshold and majority prize on a regional basis, is adopted for the election of the Senate. To the distribution of the seats, which takes place according to the hare method of the whole quotients and the highest remains, the lists contribute that within the regional district have obtained at least 8% of the valid votes, or at least 3% if they are part of a coalition that has obtained at least 20%. In any case, the coalition or more voted single list is awarded at least 55% of the seats: if this threshold is not reached, a majority prize is awarded, in the form of additional seats, which reduces those attributed to other political forces.
XV Legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Electoral data [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
List |
Votes | % | Seats | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
693 313 | 29.84 | 6 | |||||||
258 207 | 11.11 | 2 | |||||||
209 710 | 9.03 | 2 | |||||||
114 163 | 4.91 | first | |||||||
56 307 | 2.42 | – | |||||||
50 181 | 2.16 | – | |||||||
17 886 | 0.77 | – | |||||||
8 966 | 0.39 | – | |||||||
6 498 | 0.28 | – | |||||||
4 667 | 0.20 | – | |||||||
4 060 | 0.17 | – | |||||||
Total coalition |
1 423 958 | 61.29 | 11 | ||||||
402 604 | 17.33 | 3 | |||||||
294 283 | 12.67 | 3 | |||||||
139 879 | 6.02 | first | |||||||
24 727 | 1.06 | – | |||||||
15 390 | 0.66 | – | |||||||
11 698 | 0.50 | – | |||||||
10 769 | 0.46 | – | |||||||
Total coalition |
899 350 | 38.71 | 7 | ||||||
Total |
2 323 308 |
100 |
18 |
||||||
Unrealities votes |
61 448 |
2.58 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 384 756 |
87.24 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 733 414 |
||||||||
Elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
XVI Legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Electoral data [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
List |
Votes | % | Seats | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 041 508 | 47.14 | ten | |||||||
73 669 | 3.33 | first | |||||||
Total coalition |
1 115 177 | 50.47 | 11 | ||||||
717 220 | 32.46 | 7 | |||||||
42 800 | 1.94 | – | |||||||
Total coalition |
760 020 | 34.40 | 7 | ||||||
113 164 | 5.12 | – | |||||||
91 885 | 4.16 | – | |||||||
53 943 | 2.44 | – | |||||||
22 417 | 1.01 | – | |||||||
17 611 | 0.80 | – | |||||||
10 475 | 0.47 | – | |||||||
For the common good |
7 310 | 0.33 | – | ||||||
6 930 | 0.31 | – | |||||||
5 911 | 0.27 | – | |||||||
European disabled European movement |
4 602 | 0.21 | – | ||||||
Total |
2 209 445 |
100 |
18 |
||||||
Unrealities votes |
68 014 |
2.99 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 277 459 |
83.53 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 726 463 |
||||||||
Elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
17 legislatura [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Electoral data [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
List |
Votes | % | Seats | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
815 708 | 39.52 | 9 | |||||||
74 394 | 3.60 | first | |||||||
7 111 | 0.34 | – | |||||||
Total coalition |
897 213 | 43.46 | ten | ||||||
468 662 | 22.70 | 4 | |||||||
371 463 | 18.00 | 3 | |||||||
37 007 | 1.79 | – | |||||||
15 799 | 0.77 | – | |||||||
12 827 | 0.62 | – | |||||||
Moderate in revolution |
2 406 | 0.12 | – | ||||||
Total coalition |
439 502 | 21.29 | 3 | ||||||
167 744 | 8.13 | first | |||||||
45 293 | 2.19 | – | |||||||
16 445 | 0.80 | – | |||||||
13 975 | 0.68 | – | |||||||
6 262 | 0.30 | – | |||||||
5 478 | 0.27 | – | |||||||
3 667 | 0.18 | – | |||||||
Total |
2 064 241 |
100 |
18 |
||||||
Unrealities votes |
61 518 |
2.89 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 125 759 |
79.02 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 690 293 |
||||||||
Elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Electoral colleges [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Dal 2017 al 2020 [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
18 seats are attributed to the district: 7 are assigned with a majority system, in as many uninominal colleges; 11 by proportional system, within two multi -nominal colleges.
From 2020 [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Following the constitutional reform of 2020 regarding the reduction of the number of parliamentarians, 12 seats are attributed to the district: 4 are assigned by majority system, in as many uninominal colleges; 8 by proportional system, within a single plurinominal college.
18 legislatur [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Results [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
List | Proportional | Majority | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Seats | Votes | % | Seats | ||||
607 142 | 30.54 | 4 | 679 520 | 34.18 | 3 | ||||
51 992 | 2.62 | – | |||||||
12 601 | 0.63 | – | |||||||
7 785 | 0.39 | – | |||||||
349 958 | 17,61 | 2 | 641 005 | 32.25 | 4 | ||||
201 535 | 10.14 | first | |||||||
78 256 | 3.94 | first | |||||||
11 256 | 0.57 | – | |||||||
484 366 | 24.37 | 3 | 484 366 | 24.37 | – | ||||
89 503 | 4.50 | – | 89 503 | 4.50 | – | ||||
35 317 | 1.78 | – | 35 317 | 1.78 | – | ||||
19 052 | 0.96 | – | 19 052 | 0.96 | – | ||||
16 952 | 0.85 | – | 16 952 | 0.85 | – | ||||
10 037 | 0.50 | – | 10 037 | 0.50 | – | ||||
Italy to the Italians (FT – FN)
|
8 618 | 0.43 | – | 8 618 | 0.43 | – | |||
For a revolutionary left (PCL – SCR)
|
3 406 | 0.17 | – | 3 406 | 0.17 | – | |||
Total |
1 987 776 |
100 |
11 |
1 987 776 |
100 |
7 |
|||
White cards |
18 937 |
0.92 |
|||||||
Null cards |
40 709 |
1.99 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 047 422 |
77.34 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 647 437 |
||||||||
Elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Elected majority [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Elected in the center -left coalition (Pd – +EUR – Together – CP)
Elected in the center -right coalition (Lega – Fi – Fdi – NCI -UDC)
Proportional elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
XIX legislature [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Electoral results [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
List | Proportional | Majority | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Seats | Votes | % | Seats | ||||
486 422 | 25.90 | 2 | 723 501 | 38.53 | 3 | ||||
120 718 | 6.43 | first | |||||||
108 192 | 5.76 | – | |||||||
8 169 | 0.44 | – | |||||||
485 329 | 25.85 | 3 | 635 562 | 33.85 | first | ||||
88 612 | 4.72 | – | |||||||
54 385 | 2.90 | – | |||||||
7 236 | 0.39 | – | |||||||
212 103 | 11.30 | first | 212 103 | 11.30 | – | ||||
175 017 | 9.32 | first | 175 017 | 9.32 | – | ||||
37 616 | 2.00 | – | 37 616 | 2.00 | – | ||||
30 937 | 1.65 | – | 30 937 | 1.65 | – | ||||
25 826 | 1.38 | – | 25 826 | 1.38 | – | ||||
24 107 | 1.28 | – | 24 107 | 1.28 | – | ||||
Life |
13 146 | 0.70 | – | 13 146 | 0.70 | – | |||
Total |
1 877 815 |
100 |
8 |
1 877 815 |
100 |
4 |
|||
Unrealities votes |
83 469 |
4.26 |
|||||||
Voters |
1 961 284 |
69.75 |
|||||||
Voters |
2 811 953 |
||||||||
Data : 25 September 2022 |
|||||||||
Elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Elected majority [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Elected in the center -left coalition (PD -IDP – AVS – +E – IC -CD)
Elected in the center -right coalition (Fdi – LSP – FI – NM)
Proportional elected [ change | Modifica Wikitesto ]
Recent Comments