Partially ordered ring – Wikipedia

Ring with a compatible partial order

In abstract algebra, a partially ordered ring is a ring (A, +, ·), together with a compatible partial order, that is, a partial order

{displaystyle ,leq ,}

on the underlying set A that is compatible with the ring operations in the sense that it satisfies:

and

for all

x,y,zA{displaystyle x,y,zin A}

.[1] Various extensions of this definition exist that constrain the ring, the partial order, or both. For example, an Archimedean partially ordered ring is a partially ordered ring

(A,){displaystyle (A,leq )}

where

A{displaystyle A}

‘s partially ordered additive group is Archimedean.[2]

An ordered ring, also called a totally ordered ring, is a partially ordered ring

(A,){displaystyle (A,leq )}

where

{displaystyle ,leq ,}

is additionally a total order.[1][2]

An l-ring, or lattice-ordered ring, is a partially ordered ring

(A,){displaystyle (A,leq )}

where

{displaystyle ,leq ,}

is additionally a lattice order.

Properties[edit]

The additive group of a partially ordered ring is always a partially ordered group.

The set of non-negative elements of a partially ordered ring (the set of elements

x{displaystyle x}

for which

0x,{displaystyle 0leq x,}

also called the positive cone of the ring) is closed under addition and multiplication, that is, if

P{displaystyle P}

is the set of non-negative elements of a partially ordered ring, then

P+PP{displaystyle P+Psubseteq P}

and

PPP.{displaystyle Pcdot Psubseteq P.}

Furthermore,

P(P)={0}.{displaystyle Pcap (-P)={0}.}

The mapping of the compatible partial order on a ring

A{displaystyle A}

to the set of its non-negative elements is one-to-one;[1] that is, the compatible partial order uniquely determines the set of non-negative elements, and a set of elements uniquely determines the compatible partial order if one exists.

If

SA{displaystyle Ssubseteq A}

is a subset of a ring

A,{displaystyle A,}

and:

then the relation

{displaystyle ,leq ,}

where

xy{displaystyle xleq y}

if and only if

yxS{displaystyle y-xin S}

defines a compatible partial order on

A{displaystyle A}

(that is,

(A,){displaystyle (A,leq )}

is a partially ordered ring).[2]

In any l-ring, the absolute value

|x|{displaystyle |x|}

of an element

x{displaystyle x}

can be defined to be

x(x),{displaystyle xvee (-x),}

where

xy{displaystyle xvee y}

denotes the maximal element. For any

x{displaystyle x}

and

y,{displaystyle y,}

holds.[3]

f-rings[edit]

An f-ring, or Pierce–Birkhoff ring, is a lattice-ordered ring

(A,){displaystyle (A,leq )}

in which

xy=0{displaystyle xwedge y=0}

[4] and

0z{displaystyle 0leq z}

imply that

zxy=xzy=0{displaystyle zxwedge y=xzwedge y=0}

for all

x,y,zA.{displaystyle x,y,zin A.}

They were first introduced by Garrett Birkhoff and Richard S. Pierce in 1956, in a paper titled “Lattice-ordered rings”, in an attempt to restrict the class of l-rings so as to eliminate a number of pathological examples. For example, Birkhoff and Pierce demonstrated an l-ring with 1 in which 1 is not positive, even though it is a square.[2] The additional hypothesis required of f-rings eliminates this possibility.

Example[edit]

Let

X{displaystyle X}

be a Hausdorff space, and

C(X){displaystyle {mathcal {C}}(X)}

be the space of all continuous, real-valued functions on

X.{displaystyle X.}

C(X){displaystyle {mathcal {C}}(X)}

is an Archimedean f-ring with 1 under the following pointwise operations:

[2]

From an algebraic point of view the rings

C(X){displaystyle {mathcal {C}}(X)}


are fairly rigid. For example, localisations, residue rings or limits of rings of the form

C(X){displaystyle {mathcal {C}}(X)}

are not of this form in general. A much more flexible class of f-rings containing all rings of continuous functions and resembling many of the properties of these rings is the class of real closed rings.

Properties[edit]

  • A direct product of f-rings is an f-ring, an l-subring of an f-ring is an f-ring, and an l-homomorphic image of an f-ring is an f-ring.[3]
  • The category Arf consists of the Archimedean f-rings with 1 and the l-homomorphisms that preserve the identity.[5]
  • Every ordered ring is an f-ring, so every sub-direct union of ordered rings is also an f-ring. Assuming the axiom of choice, a theorem of Birkhoff shows the converse, and that an l-ring is an f-ring if and only if it is l-isomorphic to a sub-direct union of ordered rings.[2] Some mathematicians take this to be the definition of an f-ring.[3]

Formally verified results for commutative ordered rings[edit]

IsarMathLib, a library for the Isabelle theorem prover, has formal verifications of a few fundamental results on commutative ordered rings. The results are proved in the ring1 context.[6]

Suppose

(A,){displaystyle (A,leq )}

is a commutative ordered ring, and

x,y,zA.{displaystyle x,y,zin A.}

Then:

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Further reading[edit]

  • Birkhoff, G.; R. Pierce (1956). “Lattice-ordered rings”. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 28: 41–69.
  • Gillman, Leonard; Jerison, Meyer Rings of continuous functions. Reprint of the 1960 edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 43. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1976. xiii+300 pp

External links[edit]