Super heavy-lift launch vehicle – Wikipedia

Launch vehicle capable of lifting more than 50 tonnes of payload into low earth orbit

A super heavy-lift launch vehicle (SHLLV) is a launch vehicle capable of lifting more than 50 tonnes (110,000 lb) (by NASA classification) or 100 tonnes (220,000 lb)[1] (by Soviet/Russian classification) of payload into low Earth orbit (LEO),[2][3] more than a heavy-lift launch vehicle.

As of September 2021 only two super heavy launch vehicles have achieved orbit carrying a super-heavy class payload of more than 50 t (110,000 lb): Saturn V (1967–1973) and Energia (1987–1988). One super heavy-lift launch vehicle is operational (Falcon Heavy), but it has not yet transported a >50 t payload to orbit. Three super heavy launch vehicles are under development: SpaceX Starship, Long March 9, and the NASA Space Launch System.

Flown vehicles[edit]


  • Saturn V was a NASA launch vehicle that made 12 orbital launches between 1967 and 1973, principally for the Apollo program through 1972. The Apollo lunar payload included a command module, service module, and Lunar Module, with a total mass of 45 t (99,000 lb).[4][5] When the third stage and Earth-orbit departure fuel was included, Saturn V placed approximately 140 t (310,000 lb) into low Earth orbit.[6] The final launch of Saturn V in 1973 placed Skylab, a 77-tonne (170,000 lb) payload, into LEO.
  • The Energia launcher was designed by the Soviet Union to launch up to 105 t (231,000 lb) to low Earth orbit.[7] Energia launched twice in 1987/88 before the program was cancelled by the Russian government, which succeeded the Soviet Union, but only the second flight payload reached orbit. On the first flight, launching the Polyus weapons platform (approximately 80 t (180,000 lb)), the vehicle failed to enter orbit due to a software error on the kick-stage.[7] The second flight successfully launched the Buran orbiter.[8]

The NASA Space Shuttle differed from traditional rockets in that the orbiter was essentially a reusable stage that carried cargo internally. Buran was intended to be reusable, similar to the Space Shuttle Orbiter, but not a rocket stage as it had no rocket engines (except for on-orbit maneuvering). It relied entirely on the disposable launcher Energia to reach orbit.


  • Falcon Heavy is rated to launch 63.8 t (141,000 lb) to low Earth orbit (LEO) in a fully expendable configuration and an estimated 57 t (126,000 lb) in a partially reusable configuration, in which only two of its three boosters are recovered.[9][10][a] As of September 2020 the latter configuration is planned to fly in early 2022,[12] but with a much smaller payload being launched to geostationary orbit. The first test flight occurred on 6 February 2018, in a configuration in which recovery of all three boosters was attempted, with Elon Musk’s Tesla Roadster of 1,250 kg (2,760 lb) sent to an orbit beyond Mars.[13][14] A second and third flight have launched payloads of 6,465 kg (14,253 lb)[15] and 3,700 kg (8,200 lb).[16]


Rocket Configuration Organization Nationality LEO payload Maiden orbital flight First >50 t payload Operational Reusable Launch cost Launch cost (2020 USD, millions)
Saturn V Apollo/Skylab NASA  United States 140 t (310,000 lb)A 1967 1967 Retired No US$1.23 billion (2019) US$1,245
N1 L3 OKB-1  Soviet Union 95 t (209,000 lb) None None Failure No 3.0 billion rubles (1971) US$17,254
Energia NPO Energia  Soviet Union 100 t (220,000 lb)C 1987 1987 Payload canceled No US$764 million (1985) US$1,838
Falcon Heavy ExpendedD SpaceX  United States 63.8 t (141,000 lb)[17] Not yetD Not yet Operational but mass and configuration untestedD No US$150 million (2018) US$154
Recoverable side boostersE 57 t (126,000 lb)[9] 2022 (planned)[18]D Not yet Operational but mass and configuration untestedD PartiallyE US$90 million (2018) US$92
Starship Super Heavy SpaceX  United States 150 t (330,000 lb)[19]F 2022 (planned)[20] N/A Development Fully US$<10 million (2022) US$<10
SLS Block 1 NASA  United States 95 t (209,000 lb)[21] 2022 (planned)[22] N/A Development No US$4.1 billion (2021) US$3,840
Block 1B 105 t (231,000 lb)[23] TBA N/A Development No Unknown Unknown
Block 2 130 t (290,000 lb)[24] TBA N/A Development No Unknown Unknown
Long March 5DY CALT  China 70 t (150,000 lb)[25] 2026 (planned)[26] N/A Development No Unknown Unknown
Long March 9 CALT  China 140 t (310,000 lb)[27] 2028 (planned)[26] N/A Development No Unknown Unknown
Yenisei Yenisei JSC SRC Progress  Russia 103 t (227,000 lb) 2028 (planned)[28] N/A Development No Unknown Unknown
Don 130 t (290,000 lb) 2030 (planned) N/A Development No Unknown Unknown

^A Includes mass of Apollo command and service modules, Apollo Lunar Module, Spacecraft/LM Adapter, Saturn V Instrument Unit, S-IVB stage, and propellant for translunar injection; payload mass to LEO is about 122.4 t (270,000 lb)[29]^C Required upper stage or payload to perform final orbital insertion^D Falcon Heavy has only flown in a configuration where all three boosters are intended to be recovered, which has a theoretical payload limit of around 45 tonnes; the first flight in a configuration where one booster core is deliberately expended is planned for early 2022.[12]^E Side booster cores recoverable and centre core intentionally expended. First re-use of the side boosters was demonstrated in 2019 when the ones used on the Arabsat-6A launch were reused on the STP-2 launch.^F Does not include dry mass of spaceship

Proposed designs[edit]

Chinese proposals[edit]

Long March 9, a 140 t (310,000 lb) to LEO capable rocket was proposed in 2018[30] by China, with plans to launch the rocket by 2028. The length of the Long March-9 will exceed 103 meters, and the rocket would have a core stage with a diameter of 10 meters. Long March 9 is expected to carry a payload of 140 tonnes into low-Earth orbit, with a capacity of 50 tonnes for Earth-Moon transfer orbit.[31] Development was approved in 2021.[32]

Russian proposals[edit]

Yenisei,[33] a super heavy-lift launch vehicle using existing components instead of pushing the less-powerful Angara A5V project, was proposed by Russia’s RSC Energia in August 2016.[34]

A revival of the Energia booster was also proposed in 2016, also to avoid pushing the Angara project.[35] If developed, this vehicle could allow Russia to launch missions towards establishing a permanent Moon base with simpler logistics, launching just one or two 80-to-160-tonne super-heavy rockets instead of four 40-tonne Angara A5Vs implying quick-sequence launches and multiple in-orbit rendezvous. In February 2018, the КРК СТК (space rocket complex of the super-heavy class) design was updated to lift at least 90 tonnes to LEO and 20 tonnes to lunar polar orbit, and to be launched from Vostochny Cosmodrome.[36] The first flight is scheduled for 2028, with Moon landings starting in 2030.[28] It looks like this proposal has been at least paused.[37]

US proposals[edit]

The Space Launch System (SLS) is a US government super heavy-lift expendable launch vehicle, which has been under development by NASA in a well-funded program for nearly a decade, and is currently slated to make its first flight not earlier than January 2022.[38] As of 2020, it is slated to be the primary launch vehicle for NASA’s deep space exploration plans,[39][40] including the planned crewed lunar flights of the Artemis program and a possible follow-on human mission to Mars in the 2030s.[41][42][43]

The SpaceX Starship system is a two-stage-to-orbit fully reusable launch vehicle being privately developed by SpaceX, consisting of the Super Heavy booster as the first stage and a second stage, also called Starship.[44][45] It is designed to be a long-duration cargo and passenger-carrying spacecraft.[46] Testing of the second stage is underway, and an orbital test of the full rocket is planned for no earlier than March 2022.[47]

Blue Origin has plans for a project following their New Glenn rocket, termed New Armstrong, which some media sources have speculated will be a larger launch vehicle.[48]

Indian proposals[edit]

In 2018, ISRO confirmed to be conducting preliminary research for the development of a super heavy-lift launch vehicle which is planned to have a lifting capacity of over 50-60 tonnes.[49]

Cancelled designs[edit]

Comparison of Saturn V, Sea Dragon and Interplanetary Transport System

Comparison of Space Shuttle, Ares I, Saturn V and Ares V

Numerous super-heavy-lift vehicles have been proposed and received various levels of development prior to their cancellation.

As part of the Soviet crewed lunar project to compete with Apollo/Saturn V, the N1 rocket was secretly designed with a payload capacity of 95 t (209,000 lb). Four test vehicles were launched from 1969 to 1972, but all failed shortly after lift-off.[50] The program was suspended in May 1974 and formally cancelled in March 1976.[51][52] The Soviet UR-700 rocket design concept competed against the N1, but was never developed. In the concept, it was to have had a payload capacity of up to 151 t (333,000 lb)[53] to low earth orbit.

During project Aelita (1969-1972), the Soviets were developing a way to beat the Americans to Mars. They designed the UR-700m, a nuclear powered variant of the UR-700, to assemble the 1,400 t (3,100,000 lb) MK-700 spacecraft in earth orbit in two launches. The rocket would have a payload capacity of 750 t (1,650,000 lb). The only Universal Rocket to make it past the design phase was the UR-500 while the N1 was selected to be the Soviets’ HLV for lunar and Martian missions.[54]

The General Dynamics Nexus was proposed in the 1960s as a fully reusable successor to the Saturn V rocket, having the capacity of transporting up to 450–910 t (990,000–2,000,000 lb) to orbit.[55][56]

The UR-900, proposed in 1969, would have had a payload capacity of 240 t (530,000 lb) to low earth orbit. It never left the drawing board.[57]

The American Saturn MLV family of rockets was proposed in 1965 by NASA as successors to the Saturn V rocket.[58] It would have been able to carry up to 160,880 kg (354,680 lb) to low Earth orbit. The Nova designs were also studied by NASA before the agency chose the Saturn V in the early 1960s.[59]

Based on the recommendations of the Stafford Synthesis report, First Lunar Outpost (FLO) would have relied on a massive Saturn-derived launch vehicle known as the Comet HLLV. The Comet would have been capable of injecting 230.8 t (508,800 lb) into low earth orbit and 88.5 t (195,200 lb) on a TLI making it one of the most capable vehicles ever designed.[60] FLO was cancelled during the design process along with the rest of the Space Exploration Initiative.[citation needed]

The U.S. Ares V for the Constellation program was intended to reuse many elements of the Space Shuttle program, both on the ground and flight hardware, to save costs. The Ares V was designed to carry 188 t (414,000 lb) and was cancelled in 2010.[61]

The Shuttle-Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (“HLV”) was an alternate super heavy-lift launch vehicle proposal for the NASA Constellation program, proposed in 2009.[62]

A 1962 design proposal, Sea Dragon, called for an enormous 150 m (490 ft) tall, sea-launched rocket capable of lifting 550 t (1,210,000 lb) to low Earth orbit. Although preliminary engineering of the design was done by TRW, the project never moved forward due to the closing of NASA’s Future Projects Branch.[63][64]

The Rus-M was a proposed Russian family of launchers whose development began in 2009. It would have had two super heavy variants: one able to lift 50-60 tons, and another able to lift 130-150 tons.[65]

SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System was a 12 m (39 ft) diameter launch vehicle concept unveiled in 2016. The payload capability was to be 550 t (1,210,000 lb) in an expendable configuration or 300 t (660,000 lb) in a reusable configuration.[66] In 2017 the 12 m evolved into a 9 m (30 ft) diameter concept Big Falcon Rocket which was renamed as SpaceX Starship.[67]

See also[edit]

  • Comparison of orbital launch systems
  • List of orbital launch systems
  • Sounding rocket, suborbital launch vehicle
  • Small-lift launch vehicle, capable of lifting up to 2,000 kg (4,400 lb) to low Earth orbit
  • Medium-lift launch vehicle, capable of lifting 2,000 to 20,000 kg (4,400 to 44,000 lb) of payload into low Earth orbit
  • Heavy-lift launch vehicle, capable of lifting 20,000 to 50,000 kg (44,000 to 110,000 lb) of payload into low Earth orbit
  1. ^ A configuration in which all three cores are intended to be recoverable is classified as a heavy-lift launch vehicle since its maximum possible payload to LEO is under 50,000 kg.[11][10]


  1. ^ Osipov, Yury (2004–2017). Great Russian Encyclopedia. Moscow: Great Russian Encyclopedia.
  2. ^ McConnaughey, Paul K.; et al. (November 2010). “Draft Launch Propulsion Systems Roadmap: Technology Area 01” (PDF). NASA. Section 1.3. Small: 0–2 t payloads; Medium: 2–20 t payloads; Heavy: 20–50 t payloads; Super Heavy: > 50 t payloads
  3. ^ “Seeking a Human Spaceflight Program Worthy of a Great Nation” (PDF). Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee. NASA. October 2009. pp. 64–66. …the U.S. human spaceflight program will require a heavy-lift launcher … in the range of 25 to 40 mt … this strongly favors a minimum heavy-lift capacity of roughly 50 mt….
  4. ^ “Apollo 11 Lunar Module”. NASA.
  5. ^ “Apollo 11 Command and Service Module (CSM)”. NASA.
  6. ^ Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities (PDF), The Congress of the United States. Congressional Budget Office, October 2006, pp. X, 1, 4, 9
  7. ^ a b “Polyus”. Encyclopedia Astronautica. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  8. ^ “Buran”. Encyclopedia Astronautica. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  9. ^ a b Musk, Elon [@elonmusk] (12 February 2018). “Side boosters landing on droneships & center expended is only ~10% performance penalty vs fully expended. Cost is only slightly higher than an expended F9, so around $95M” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  10. ^ a b “Capabilities & Services”. SpaceX. Retrieved 13 February 2018.
  11. ^ Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (30 April 2016). “@elonmusk Max performance numbers are for expendable launches. Subtract 30% to 40% for reusable booster payload” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  12. ^ a b Clark, Stephen (4 October 2021). “Payload issue delays SpaceX’s next Falcon Heavy launch to early 2022”. Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 7 November 2021.
  13. ^ Chang, Kenneth (6 February 2018). “Falcon Heavy, SpaceX’s Big New Rocket, Succeeds in Its First Test Launch”. The New York Times. Retrieved 6 February 2018.
  14. ^ “Tesla Roadster (AKA: Starman, 2018-017A)”. 1 March 2018. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
  15. ^ “Arabsat 6A”. Gunter’s Space Page. Archived from the original on 16 July 2019. Retrieved 13 April 2019.
  16. ^ SMC [@AF_SMC] (18 June 2019). “The 3700 kg Integrated Payload Stack (IPS) for #STP2 has been completed! Have a look before it blasts off on the first #DoD Falcon Heavy launch! #SMC #SpaceStartsHere” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  17. ^ “Falcon Heavy”. SpaceX. 16 November 2012. Retrieved 5 April 2017.
  18. ^ Erwin, Sandra (31 October 2021). “Falcon Heavy could launch three U.S. Space Force missions in 2022”. SpaceNews. Retrieved 21 November 2021.
  19. ^ Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (23 May 2019). “Aiming for 150 tons useful load in fully reusable configuration, but should be at least 100 tons, allowing for mass growth” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  20. ^ “SpaceX’s first orbital Starship launch slips to March 2022 in NASA document”. 18 October 2021.
  21. ^ Harbaugh, Jennifer, ed. (9 July 2018). “The Great Escape: SLS Provides Power for Missions to the Moon”. NASA. Retrieved 4 September 2018.
  22. ^ “Ten month schedule to ready SLS for Artemis 1 launch after Core Stage arrives at KSC”. 3 May 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
  23. ^ “Space Launch System” (PDF). NASA Facts. NASA. 11 October 2017. FS-2017-09-92-MSFC. Retrieved 4 September 2018.
  24. ^ Creech, Stephen (April 2014). “NASA’s Space Launch System: A Capability for Deep Space Exploration” (PDF). NASA. p. 2. Retrieved 4 September 2018.
  25. ^ Jones, Andrew (1 October 2020). “China is building a new rocket to fly its astronauts on the moon”. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
  26. ^ a b Jones, Andrew (17 December 2021). “China’s new rocket for crewed moon missions to launch around 2026”. SpaceNews. Retrieved 19 December 2021.
  27. ^ Mizokami, Kyle (20 March 2018). “China Working on a New Heavy-Lift Rocket as Powerful as Saturn V”. Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
  28. ^ a b Zak, Anatoly (8 February 2019). “Russia Is Now Working on a Super Heavy Rocket of Its Own”. Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 20 February 2019.
  29. ^
  30. ^
  31. ^ Mu Xuequan (19 September 2018). “China to launch Long March-9 rocket in 2028”. Xinhua.
  32. ^ Berger, Eric (24 February 2021). “China officially plans to move ahead with super-heavy Long March 9 rocket”. Ars Technica. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
  33. ^ Zak, Anatoly (19 February 2019). “The Yenisei super-heavy rocket”. RussianSpaceWeb. Retrieved 20 February 2019.
  34. ^ “Роскосмос” создаст новую сверхтяжелую ракету”. Izvestia (in Russian). 22 August 2016.
  35. ^ “Роскосмос” создаст новую сверхтяжелую ракету. Izvestia (in Russian). 22 August 2016.
  36. ^ “РКК “Энергия” стала головным разработчиком сверхтяжелой ракеты-носителя” [RSC Energia is the lead developer of the super-heavy carrier rocket]. RIA Novosti. 2 February 2018. Retrieved 3 February 2018.
  37. ^ “Better late than never: why the development of the Yenisei launch vehicle was stopped”. 17 September 2021.
  38. ^ Sloss, Philip (29 September 2021). “EGS, Jacobs completing first round of Artemis 1 pre-launch integrated tests prior to Orion stacking”. Archived from the original on 29 September 2021. Retrieved 29 September 2021.
  39. ^ Siceloff, Steven (12 April 2015). “SLS Carries Deep Space Potential”. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  40. ^ “World’s Most Powerful Deep Space Rocket Set To Launch In 2018”. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  41. ^ Chiles, James R. “Bigger Than Saturn, Bound for Deep Space”. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  42. ^ “Finally, some details about how NASA actually plans to get to Mars”. 28 March 2017. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  43. ^ Gebhardt, Chris (6 April 2017). “NASA finally sets goals, missions for SLS – eyes multi-step plan to Mars”. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
  44. ^ Berger, Eric (29 September 2019). “Elon Musk, Man of Steel, reveals his stainless Starship”. Ars Technica. Retrieved 30 September 2019.
  45. ^ “Starship”. SpaceX. Retrieved 2 October 2019.
  46. ^ Lawler, Richard (20 November 2018). “SpaceX BFR has a new name: Starship”. Engadget. Retrieved 21 November 2018.
  47. ^ “SpaceX’s first orbital Starship launch slips to March 2022 in NASA document”. 18 October 2021.
  48. ^ “Blue Origin’s huge new rocket has a nose cone bigger than its current rocket”.
  49. ^ “Have tech to configure launch vehicle that can carry 50-tonne payload: Isro chairman – Times of India”. The Times of India. 14 February 2018. Retrieved 22 July 2019.
  50. ^ “N1 Moon Rocket”.
  51. ^ Harvey, Brian (2007). Soviet and Russian Lunar Exploration. Springer-Praxis Books in Space Exploration. Springer Science+Business Media. p. 230. ISBN 978-0-387-21896-0.
  52. ^ van Pelt, Michel (2017). Dream Missions: Space Colonies, Nuclear Spacecraft and Other Possibilities. Springer-Praxis Books in Space Exploration. Springer Science+Business Media. p. 22. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53941-6. ISBN 978-3-319-53939-3.
  53. ^ “UR-700”.
  54. ^ “UR-700M”. Retrieved 10 October 2019.
  55. ^ “Ch2”.
  56. ^ “Nexus”.
  57. ^ “UR-900”.
  58. ^[bare URL PDF]
  59. ^ “Nova: The Apollo rocket that never was”.
  60. ^ “First Lunar Outpost”.
  61. ^ “Ares”.
  62. ^[bare URL PDF]
  63. ^ Grossman, David (3 April 2017). “The Enormous Sea-Launched Rocket That Never Flew”. Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 17 May 2017.
  64. ^ “Study of Large Sea-Launch Space Vehicle,” Contract NAS8-2599, Space Technology Laboratories, Inc./Aerojet General Corporation Report #8659-6058-RU-000, Vol. 1 – Design, January 1963
  65. ^ “Rus-M launch vehicle”.
  66. ^ “Making Humans a Multiplanetary Species” (PDF). SpaceX. 27 September 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
  67. ^ Boyle, Alan (19 November 2018). “Goodbye, BFR … hello, Starship: Elon Musk gives a classic name to his Mars spaceship”. GeekWire. Retrieved 22 November 2018.

Further reading[edit]