[{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki19\/2019-term-united-states-supreme-court-opinions-of-sonia-sotomayor\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki19\/2019-term-united-states-supreme-court-opinions-of-sonia-sotomayor\/","headline":"2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor","name":"2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor","description":"Type Case Citation Issues Joined by Other opinions 201 Rotkiske v. Klemm 589 U.S. ___ (2019) Statute of limitations \u00a0\u2022","datePublished":"2017-05-14","dateModified":"2017-05-14","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki19\/author\/lordneo\/#Person","name":"lordneo","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki19\/author\/lordneo\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9645c498c9701c88b89b8537773dd7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9645c498c9701c88b89b8537773dd7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":100,"height":100},"url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki19\/2019-term-united-states-supreme-court-opinions-of-sonia-sotomayor\/","about":["Wiki"],"wordCount":4155,"articleBody":"TypeCaseCitationIssuesJoined byOther opinions201Rotkiske v. Klemm589 U.S. ___ (2019)Statute of limitations \u00a0\u2022  Equitable tolling \u00a0\u2022  Statutory interpretation102Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.589 U.S. ___ (2019)American Rule \u00a0\u2022  Attorney fees \u00a0\u2022  PatentsUnanimous103CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.589 U.S. ___ (2020)admiralty law \u00a0\u2022  warranty of safety \u00a0\u2022  safe-berth clauseRoberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh404Kansas v. Glover589 U.S. ___ (2020)Fourth Amendment \u00a0\u2022  investigative traffic stop due to revoked license205Babb v. Wilkie589 U.S. ___ (2020)Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 \u00a0\u2022  age as factor in federal-sector personnel actionsGinsburg506Rhines v. Young589 U.S. ___ (2019)state clemency process \u00a0\u2022  access by defendant’s expertsSotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court’s denial of certiorari.407Peithman v. United States589 U.S. ___ (2019)civil forfeiture \u00a0\u2022  joint and several liabilitySotomayor dissented from the Court’s denial of certiorari.508Isom v. Arkansas589 U.S. ___ (2019)Sotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court’s denial of certiorari.509Schexnayder v. Vannoy589 U.S. ___ (2019)Sotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court’s denial of certiorari.510Cottier v. United States589 U.S. ___ (2019)Sotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court’s denial of certiorari.411Wolf v. Cook County589 U.S. ___ (2020)immigration law \u00a0\u2022  inadmissibility of those likely to become public charge \u00a0\u2022  standard for granting staySotomayor dissented from the Court’s grant of application for stay.512Reed v. Texas589 U.S. ___ (2020)actual innocenceSotomayor filed a statement respecting the denial of certiorari.513Halprin v. Davis589 U.S. ___ (2020)Due Process Clause \u00a0\u2022  racial judicial biasSotomayor filed a statement respecting the denial of certiorari.214Ramos v. Louisiana590 U.S. ___ (2020)Sixth Amendment \u00a0\u2022  unanimity of jury verdict215Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.590 U.S. ___ (2020)trademark law \u00a0\u2022  Lanham Act \u00a0\u2022  award of profits for infringement416Barton v. Barr590 U.S. ___ (2020)immigration law \u00a0\u2022  cancellation of removal eligibilityGinsburg, Breyer, Kagan117Maine Community Health Options v. United States590 U.S. ___ (2020)Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act \u00a0\u2022  government obligation to reimburse insurer losses from online exchangesRoberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Kavanaugh; Thomas, Gorsuch (in part)118Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group, Inc.590 U.S. ___ (2020)trademark law \u00a0\u2022  res judicata \u00a0\u2022  defense preclusionUnanimous219GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC590 U.S. ___ (2020)Federal Arbitration Act \u00a0\u2022  New York Convention \u00a0\u2022  equitable estoppel \u00a0\u2022  enforcement of arbitration agreement by nonsignatories220Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC590 U.S. ___ (2020)Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act \u00a0\u2022  Article II \u00a0\u2022  Appointments Clause421Thole v. U. S. Bank N. A.590 U.S. ___ (2020)Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 \u00a0\u2022  Article III \u00a0\u2022  standingGinsburg, Breyer, Kagan422United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Assn.590 U.S. ___ (2020)United States Forest Service authority to grant pipeline right-of-way \u00a0\u2022  National Trails System Act \u00a0\u2022  Mineral Leasing ActKagan523Valentine v. Collier590 U.S. ___ (2020)Eighth Amendment \u00a0\u2022  COVID-19 pandemic \u00a0\u2022  Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 \u00a0\u2022  exhaustion of remediesGinsburgSotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court’s denial of application to vacate stay.524St. Hubert v. United States590 U.S. ___ (2020)Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996Sotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court’s denial of certiorari.325Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.591 U.S. ___ (2020)Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals \u00a0\u2022  Administrative Procedure Act126Liu v. SEC591 U.S. ___ (2020)securities law \u00a0\u2022  disgorgement as equitable reliefRoberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh427Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam591 U.S. ___ (2020)Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act \u00a0\u2022  eligibility for asylum \u00a0\u2022  habeas corpus \u00a0\u2022  Article One \u00a0\u2022  Suspension Clause \u00a0\u2022  Due Process ClauseKagan428Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue591 U.S. ___ (2020)state law prohibition on government aid to religious schools \u00a0\u2022  First Amendment \u00a0\u2022  Free Exercise Clause229Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V.591 U.S. ___ (2020)trademark law \u00a0\u2022  eligibility of generic term combined with domain name for protection230Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.591 U.S. ___ (2020)Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 \u00a0\u2022  prohibition of robocalls to cell phones \u00a0\u2022  exception for government debt collection \u00a0\u2022  First Amendment \u00a0\u2022  free speech431Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru591 U.S. ___ (2020)First Amendment \u00a0\u2022  ministerial exception to employment discrimination claimsGinsburg432Barr v. Lee591 U.S. ___ (2020)Eighth Amendment \u00a0\u2022  death penaltyGinsburg, KaganSotomayor dissented from the Court’s grant of application for stay or vacatur.533Texas Democratic Party v. Abbott591 U.S. ___ (2020)Twenty-sixth AmendmentSotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court’s denial of application to vacate stay.434Barr v. Purkey591 U.S. ___ (2020)Eighth Amendment \u00a0\u2022  death penaltyGinsburg, Breyer, KaganSotomayor dissented from the Court’s grant of application for stay or vacatur.435Raysor v. DeSantis591 U.S. ___ (2020)Ginsburg, KaganSotomayor dissented from the Court’s denial of application to vacate stay.436Little v. Reclaim Idaho591 U.S. ___ (2020)GinsburgSotomayor dissented from the Court’s grant of application for stay.437Barnes v. Ahlman591 U.S. ___ (2020)GinsburgSotomayor dissented from the Court’s grant of application for stay.538Mitchell v. United States591 U.S. ___ (2020)Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994Sotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court’s denial of application for stay of execution."},{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki19\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki19\/2019-term-united-states-supreme-court-opinions-of-sonia-sotomayor\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"2019 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor"}}]}]