Multiply perfect number – Wikipedia

before-content-x4

Number whose divisors add to a multiple of that number

after-content-x4

In mathematics, a multiply perfect number (also called multiperfect number or pluperfect number) is a generalization of a perfect number.

For a given natural number k, a number n is called k-perfect (or k-fold perfect) if the sum of all positive divisors of n (the divisor function, σ(n)) is equal to kn; a number is thus perfect if and only if it is 2-perfect. A number that is k-perfect for a certain k is called a multiply perfect number. As of 2014, k-perfect numbers are known for each value of k up to 11.[1]

It is unknown whether there are any odd multiply perfect numbers other than 1. The first few multiply perfect numbers are:

1, 6, 28, 120, 496, 672, 8128, 30240, 32760, 523776, 2178540, 23569920, 33550336, 45532800, 142990848, 459818240, … (sequence A007691 in the OEIS).

Example[edit]

The sum of the divisors of 120 is

1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 8 + 10 + 12 + 15 + 20 + 24 + 30 + 40 + 60 + 120 = 360

which is 3 × 120. Therefore 120 is a 3-perfect number.

after-content-x4

Smallest known k-perfect numbers[edit]

The following table gives an overview of the smallest known k-perfect numbers for k ≤ 11 (sequence A007539 in the OEIS):

k Smallest known k-perfect number Factors Found by
1 1 ancient
2 6 2 × 3 ancient
3 120 23 × 3 × 5 ancient
4 30240 25 × 33 × 5 × 7 René Descartes, circa 1638
5 14182439040 27 × 34 × 5 × 7 × 112 × 17 × 19 René Descartes, circa 1638
6 154345556085770649600 (21 digits) 215 × 35 × 52 × 72 × 11 × 13 × 17 × 19 × 31 × 43 × 257 Robert Daniel Carmichael, 1907
7 141310897947438348259849402738485523264343544818565120000 (57 digits) 232 × 311 × 54 × 75 × 112 × 132 × 17 × 193 × 23 × 31 × 37 × 43 × 61 × 71 × 73 × 89 × 181 × 2141 × 599479 TE Mason, 1911
8 826809968707776137289924…057256213348352000000000 (133 digits) 262 × 315 × 59 × 77 × 113 × 133 × 172 × 19 × 23 × 29 × … × 487 × 5212 × 601 × 1201 × 1279 × 2557 × 3169 × 5113 × 92737 × 649657 (38 distinct prime factors) Stephen F. Gretton, 1990[1]
9 561308081837371589999987…415685343739904000000000 (287 digits) 2104 × 343 × 59 × 712 × 116 × 134 × 17 × 194 × 232 × 29 × … × 17351 × 29191 × 30941 × 45319 × 106681 × 110563 × 122921 × 152041 × 570461 × 16148168401 (66 distinct prime factors) Fred Helenius, 1995[1]
10 448565429898310924320164…000000000000000000000000 (639 digits) 2175 × 369 × 529 × 718 × 1119 × 138 × 179 × 197 × 239 × 293 × … × 583367 × 1609669 × 3500201 × 119782433 × 212601841 × 2664097031 × 2931542417 × 43872038849 × 374857981681 × 4534166740403 (115 distinct prime factors) George Woltman, 2013[1]
11 251850413483992918774837…000000000000000000000000 (1907 digits) 2468 × 3140 × 566 × 749 × 1140 × 1331 × 1711 × 1912 × 239 × 297 × … × 25922273669242462300441182317 × 15428152323948966909689390436420781 × 420391294797275951862132367930818883361 × 23735410086474640244277823338130677687887 × 628683935022908831926019116410056880219316806841500141982334538232031397827230330241 (246 distinct prime factors) George Woltman, 2001[1]

Properties[edit]

It can be proven that:

  • For a given prime number p, if n is p-perfect and p does not divide n, then pn is (p + 1)-perfect. This implies that an integer n is a 3-perfect number divisible by 2 but not by 4, if and only if n/2 is an odd perfect number, of which none are known.
  • If 3n is 4k-perfect and 3 does not divide n, then n is 3k-perfect.

Odd multiply perfect numbers[edit]

It is unknown whether there are any odd multiply perfect numbers other than 1. However if an odd k-perfect number n exists where k > 2, then it must satisfy the following conditions:[2]

  • The largest prime factor is ≥ 100129
  • The second largest prime factor is ≥ 1009
  • The third largest prime factor is ≥ 101

In little-o notation, the number of multiply perfect numbers less than x is

o(xε){displaystyle o(x^{varepsilon })}

for all ε > 0.[2]

The number of k-perfect numbers n for nx is less than

cxclogloglogx/loglogx{displaystyle cx^{c’log log log x/log log x}}

, where c and c’ are constants independent of k.[2]

Under the assumption of the Riemann hypothesis, the following inequality is true for all k-perfect numbers n, where k > 3

after-content-x4