[{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/der-sturmer-wikipedia\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/der-sturmer-wikipedia\/","headline":"Der St\u00fcrmer – Wikipedia","name":"Der St\u00fcrmer – Wikipedia","description":"before-content-x4 German antisemitic tabloid newspaper from 1923 to 1945 Not to be confused with Der Sturm, an unrelated arts magazine,","datePublished":"2020-10-21","dateModified":"2020-10-21","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/author\/lordneo\/#Person","name":"lordneo","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/author\/lordneo\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9645c498c9701c88b89b8537773dd7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9645c498c9701c88b89b8537773dd7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/a\/ab\/Bundesarchiv_Bild_133-075%2C_Worms%2C_Antisemitische_Presse%2C_%22St%C3%BCrmerkasten%22.jpg\/220px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_133-075%2C_Worms%2C_Antisemitische_Presse%2C_%22St%C3%BCrmerkasten%22.jpg","url":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/a\/ab\/Bundesarchiv_Bild_133-075%2C_Worms%2C_Antisemitische_Presse%2C_%22St%C3%BCrmerkasten%22.jpg\/220px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_133-075%2C_Worms%2C_Antisemitische_Presse%2C_%22St%C3%BCrmerkasten%22.jpg","height":"153","width":"220"},"url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/der-sturmer-wikipedia\/","about":["Wiki"],"wordCount":4914,"articleBody":"     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});before-content-x4German antisemitic tabloid newspaper from 1923 to 1945Not to be confused with Der Sturm, an unrelated arts magazine, or The Daily Stormer, an American neo-Nazi website whose name derives from this publication.       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Der St\u00fcrmer (pronounced [de\u02d0\u0250\u032f \u02c8\u0283t\u028f\u0281m\u0250]; literally, “The Stormer \/ Attacker \/ Striker”) was a weekly German tabloid-format newspaper published from 1923 to the end of World War II by Julius Streicher, the Gauleiter of Franconia, with brief suspensions in publication due to legal difficulties. It was a significant part of Nazi propaganda, and was virulently anti-Semitic.[1] The paper was not an official publication of the Nazi Party, but was published privately by Streicher. For this reason, the paper did not display the Nazi Party swastika in its logo.The paper was a very lucrative business for Streicher, and made him a multi-millionaire.[2] The newspaper originated at Nuremberg during Adolf Hitler’s attempt to establish power and control. The first copy of Der St\u00fcrmer was published on 20 April 1923.[3]Der St\u00fcrmer‘s circulation grew over time, eventually distributing to a large percentage of the German population, as well as Argentina, Brazil, Canada, and the United States. The newspaper reached a peak circulation of 486,000 in 1937.[2]Unlike the V\u00f6lkischer Beobachter (The V\u00f6lkisch Observer), the official Nazi Party paper, which gave itself an outwardly serious appearance, Der St\u00fcrmer often ran obscene material such as the blood libel and graphic caricatures of Jews,[1] as well as sexually explicit, anti-communist, and anti-monarchist propaganda. As early as 1933, Streicher was calling for the extermination of the Jews in Der St\u00fcrmer.[4] During the war, Streicher regularly authorized articles demanding the annihilation and extermination of the “Jewish race”.[3] After the war, Streicher was convicted of being an accessory for crimes against humanity, and was executed by hanging.[5]       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Table of ContentsCirculation[edit]Nazi attitudes towards the paper[edit]Antisemitic content[edit]Antisemitic caricatures[edit]Alleged sexual crimes[edit]Accusations of financial crimes[edit]See also[edit]References[edit]External links[edit]Circulation[edit]  German citizens publicly reading pages of Der St\u00fcrmer in Worms, 1935. The billboard heading reads: “With the St\u00fcrmer against Judah”. The subheading reads: “The Jews are our misfortune”.Most of the paper’s readers were young people, and people from the lowest strata of German society. Copies of Der St\u00fcrmer were displayed in prominent red St\u00fcrmerk\u00e4sten (display boxes) throughout the Reich. As well as advertising the publication, the cases also allowed its articles to reach those readers who either did not have time to buy and read a newspaper in depth, or could not afford the expense. In 1927, Der St\u00fcrmer sold about 27,000 copies every week. By 1935, its circulation had increased to around 480,000.[2]       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Nazi attitudes towards the paper[edit]From the late 1920s, Julius Streicher’s vulgar style of propagandism increasingly became a cause of embarrassment for the Nazi Party. In 1936, the sale of Der St\u00fcrmer was restricted in Berlin during the Summer Olympics, in an attempt to preserve the Nazi regime’s international reputation and prestige. Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels tried to completely ban the newspaper in 1938,[2]Reichsmarschall Hermann G\u00f6ring forbade Der St\u00fcrmer in all of his departments, and Baldur von Schirach prohibited Hitler Youth  members from reading it in Hitler Youth-sponsored hostels and other education facilities by a “Reichsbefehl” (“Reich command”).[6] G\u00f6ring harboured a particularly intense hatred of the paper, especially after it published a libelous article alleging that his daughter Edda had been conceived through artificial insemination. It was only through Hitler’s intervention that Streicher was spared from severe punishment.[7]However, other senior Nazi officials, including Reichsf\u00fchrer-SS Heinrich Himmler, chairman of the German Labour Front Robert Ley, and proprietor of the Zentral Verlag (Central Press) Max Amann, whose organization comprised 80% of the German press, endorsed the publication, and their statements were often published in the paper. Albert Forster, the Gauleiter of Danzig (now Gda\u0144sk), wrote in 1937:With pleasure, I say that the St\u00fcrmer, more than any other daily or weekly newspaper, has made clear to the people in simple ways the danger of Jewry. Without Julius Streicher and his St\u00fcrmer, the importance of a solution to the Jewish question would not be seen to be as critical as it actually is by many citizens. It is therefore to be hoped that those who want to learn the unvarnished truth about the Jewish question will read the St\u00fcrmer.[8]Hitler considered Streicher’s primitive methods to be effective in influencing “the man in the street”.[3] Although Streicher and his paper were increasingly isolated in the Nazi party, Hitler continued to support Streicher, and was an avid reader of Der St\u00fcrmer.[2] In December 1941, he stated: “Streicher is reproached for his St\u00fcrmer. The truth is the opposite of what people say: He idealized the Jew. The Jew is baser, fiercer, more diabolical than Streicher depicted him.” In February 1942, he praised the newspaper, by stating: “One must never forget the services rendered by the St\u00fcrmer. Now that the Jews are known for what they are, nobody any longer thinks that Streicher libeled them.”[9]Hermann Rauschning, who claimed to be Hitler’s “confidant”, said in the mid-1930s:Antisemitism was beyond question the most important weapon in Hitler’s propagandist arsenal, and almost everywhere, it was of deadly efficiency. That was why he had allowed Streicher, for example, a free hand. The man’s stuff, too, was amusing, and very cleverly done. Wherever, he wondered, did Streicher get his constant supply of new material? He, Hitler, was simply on thorns to see each new issue of the St\u00fcrmer. It was the one periodical that he always read with pleasure, from the first page to the last.[10]During the war, the paper’s circulation suffered because of paper shortages, as well as Streicher’s exile from Nuremberg for corruption. More ominously, because of the Holocaust, the people it targeted had begun to disappear from everyday life, which diminished the paper’s relevance. Hitler, however, insisted that Streicher receive sufficient support to continue publishing Der St\u00fcrmer. The final edition of the newspaper was published in February 1945. The chief editor, Julius Streicher, was tried at Nuremberg after the end of the war, and after being found guilty of being an accessory to crimes against humanity, he was hanged in 1946.[11]  Antisemitic content[edit]  1934 St\u00fcrmer issue: “Storm above Judah” \u2013 attacking institutional churches as “Judaized” organizations. Caption: Two thousand years ago I called the Jews a cursed people, but you have made out of them the Elect Nation.According to the American writer Dennis Showalter, “a major challenge of political antisemitism involves overcoming the images of the ‘Jew next door’ \u2013 the living, breathing acquaintance or associate whose simple existence appears to deny the validity of that negative stereotype”. The newspaper’s lurid content appealed to a large spectrum of readers who were lower class and less-sophisticated.[3]Der St\u00fcrmer was known for its use of simple themes that required little thought. The newspaper often gave descriptions of how to identify Jewish people, and included racist political cartoons, including antisemitic caricatures. Besides the graphic depictions, articles often focused on imaginary fears, exaggerations, and perceived behavioral differences between Jews and other German citizens.[12]After the war, Streicher was tried at the Nuremberg trials. His publishing and speaking activities were a major part of the evidence presented against him. In essence, the prosecutors took the line that Streicher’s role in inciting Germans to exterminate Jews made him an accessory to murder, and thus as culpable as those who actually carried out the killing. Prosecutors also introduced decisive and irrefutable evidence that Streicher continued his incendiary articles and speeches when he was well aware that Jews were being slaughtered. Streicher was found guilty of being an accessory for crimes against humanity, and was executed by hanging shortly afterwards.[5]Antisemitic caricatures[edit]Der St\u00fcrmer was known for its virulently antisemitic caricatures, which depicted Jews as ugly characters with exaggerated facial features and misshapen bodies. In his propaganda work, Streicher furthered medieval stereotypes accusing Jews of killing children, sacrificing their bodies, and drinking their blood. The large majority of these drawings were the work of Philipp Rupprecht, known as Fips, who was one of the best-known antisemitic cartoonists of Nazi Germany. Through the adaptation and amalgamation of almost every existing antisemitic stereotype, myth, and tradition, Rupprecht’s virulent attacks aimed predominantly at the dehumanization and demonization of Jews.[13] At the bottom of the title page, there was always the motto “Die Juden sind unser Ungl\u00fcck!” (“The Jews are our misfortune!”), coined by Heinrich von Treitschke in the 1880s.[14] In the nameplate was the motto “Deutsches Wochenblatt zum Kampfe um die Wahrheit” (“German Weekly Newspaper in the Fight for Truth”).[citation needed]Alleged sexual crimes[edit]Stories of Rassenschande, which denoted alleged scandals of Jewish men and German women having sex, were staples of Der St\u00fcrmer.[15] Streicher described Jews as sex offenders who were[12] “violators of the innocent, perpetrators of bizarre sex crimes, and ritual murderers”, who allegedly performed in religious ceremonies using blood of other humans, usually Christians. Streicher also frequently reported attempts of child molestation by Jews. Der St\u00fcrmer never lacked details about sexual intercourse, names, and crimes to keep readers aroused and entertained. These accusations, articles, and crimes printed in Der St\u00fcrmer were often inaccurate, and rarely investigated by staff members. In the newspaper’s opinion, if a German girl became pregnant by a Jew, the Jew would deny paternity, offer to pay for an abortion, fail to pay child support, or leave for the U.S. Within Der St\u00fcrmer, it was not uncommon to read reports of German women aborting their children because they did not want to bring a “Jewish bastard into the world”.[12]Streicher believed in the antisemitic telegony hypotheses of Artur Dinter, whose 1917 best-seller book Die S\u00fcnde wider das Blut (“The Sin Against the Blood”) claimed that the ejaculation of semen of a Jewish man into the vagina of a “German-blooded” woman was sufficient to change the woman so effectively that all of her future descendants would have “Jewish blood”.[16] This hypothesis was rejected by the Nazis in the 1935 Nuremberg racial laws, and was called a “heresy” by the Racial Office of the NSDAP.[16] The official Nazi position stated that “the racial characteristics of a person are determined by heredity”.[16]Accusations of financial crimes[edit]Showalter said: “For Julius Streicher, the Jews’ hatred for Christianity was concealed only for one reason: Business.” Jewish businessmen were often portrayed as doing almost anything to obtain financial wealth, which included, in his words, “become a usurer, a traitor, a murderer”.[12] In the summer of 1931, Streicher focused much of the paper’s attention on a Jewish-owned butchery. As an example, when a philanthropic merchant started operating a soup kitchen, Der St\u00fcrmer ran articles accusing the business of poisoning the food being served. Der St\u00fcrmer criticized and cherrypicked every single price increase and decrease in Jewish shops, as well as their charitable donations, denouncing it as a further form of financial greed. This attack on Jewish benevolence, generosity, and philanthropism received the most public criticism out of all of Der St\u00fcrmer’s antisemitic propaganda. Its “Letter Box” encouraged the reporting of Jewish illegal acts, while its unofficial style helped prevent suspicion of propaganda, and lent it an air of “authenticity”.[17]See also[edit]References[edit]Notes^ a b Koonz, p. 228^ a b c d e “Der St\u00fcrmer. Deutsches Wochenblatt zum Kampf um die Wahrheit \u2013 Historisches Lexikon Bayerns”. www.historisches-lexikon-bayerns.de. Retrieved 7 April 2023.^ a b c d Holocaust Education and Archive Research Team. Holocaust Research Project. 2009. Web. 21 October 2009.^ Streicher, Julius (1933). Die Geheimpl\u00e4ne gegen Deutschland enth\u00fcllt (in German). Der St\u00fcrmer.^ a b “Streicher judgement”.^ IMT vol. XIII\/XIV[clarification needed]^ Dolibois, John E. (2001) Pattern of Circles: An Ambassador’s Story. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press. ISBN\u00a00873387023[page\u00a0needed]^ Thompson, Allan (2007) The Media and the Rwanda Genocide. London: Pluto Press. p. 334 ISBN\u00a09780745326252^ Trevor-Roper, Hugh R. and Weinberg, Gerhard L. (2013). Hitler’s Table Talk 1941\u20131944: Secret Conversations. Enigma Books. pp.118, 250. ISBN\u00a0978-1-936274-93-2.^ Rauschning, Hermann (1939) Hitler Speaks. London: Thornton Buttersworth. pp. 233\u2013234^ Jennifer Rosenberg (2 April 2017). “Der Stuermer: An Overview of the Nazi’s Antisemitic Newspaper”. ThoughtCo. Retrieved 2 February 2019.^ a b c d Showalter, Dennis E. (1982) Little Man What Now? Der St\u00fcrmer in the Weimer Republic Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books.[page\u00a0needed]^ Linsler, Carl-Eric. St\u00fcrmer-Karikaturen, in: Handbuch des Antisemitismus. Judenfeindschaft in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Bd. 7: Literatur, Film, Theater und Kunst, hrsg. von Wolfgang Benz, Berlin 2015, p. 477.^ Ben-Sasson, H.H., ed. (1976) A History of the Jewish People. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 875. ISBN\u00a00-674-39730-4^ Fink, Fritz (1935) “The End: Betrayed to Death by a Jew” Der Sturner from Calvin College German Propaganda Archive^ a b c Bensow, Laura (2016). “Frauen und M\u00e4dchen, die Juden sind Euer Verderben!” Eine Untersuchung antisemitischer NS-Propaganda unter Anwendung der Analysekategorie Geschlecht. Hamburg: Marta Press. p.\u00a0140.^ Koonz, pp. 230\u2013231^ Wines, Michael (5 July 2015). “White Supremacists Extend Their Reach Through Websites”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 24 October 2015. Retrieved 6 October 2015.^ O’Brien, Luke (19 January 2018). “American Neo-Nazi Is Using Holocaust Denial As A Legal Defense”. HuffPost. Archived from the original on 23 April 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2018.^ Gerhardt, Christina (4 December 2016). “Google Image, The Daily Stormer And Anti-Semitism”. The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 24 December 2016. Retrieved 24 December 2016.BibliographyBytwerk, R.L. Julius Streicher (New York: Cooper Square, 2001), p.\u00a059.Imbleau, Martin. “Der St\u00fcrmer.” Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity. Ed. Dinah Shelton. Vol. 1. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005. 247\u2013249. 3 vols. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Thomson Gale.Keysers, Ralph. Der St\u00fcrmer: Instrument de l’id\u00e9ologie nazie: Une analyse des caricatures d’intoxication. L’Harmattan, Paris 2012. ISBN\u00a0978-2-296-96258-3.Koonz, Claudia (2003) The Nazi Conscience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press.ISBN\u00a00-674-01172-4Wistrich, Robert. Who’s Who in Nazi Germany (Routledge, New York, 1995), q. v. Streicher, Julius.External links[edit]     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4"},{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/der-sturmer-wikipedia\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Der St\u00fcrmer – Wikipedia"}}]}]