[{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/nuclear-weapons-in-popular-culture\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/nuclear-weapons-in-popular-culture\/","headline":"Nuclear weapons in popular culture","name":"Nuclear weapons in popular culture","description":"before-content-x4 Cultural depictions of nuclear weapons A nuclear fireball lights up the night in a United States nuclear test. after-content-x4","datePublished":"2016-01-13","dateModified":"2016-01-13","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/author\/lordneo\/#Person","name":"lordneo","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/author\/lordneo\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9645c498c9701c88b89b8537773dd7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9645c498c9701c88b89b8537773dd7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/7\/79\/Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg\/220px-Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg","url":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/7\/79\/Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg\/220px-Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg","height":"187","width":"220"},"url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/nuclear-weapons-in-popular-culture\/","wordCount":3646,"articleBody":" (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});before-content-x4Cultural depictions of nuclear weapons A nuclear fireball lights up the night in a United States nuclear test. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Since their public debut in August 1945, nuclear weapons and their potential effects have been a recurring motif in popular culture,[1] to the extent that the decades of the Cold War are often referred to as the “atomic age”. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Table of ContentsImages of nuclear weapons[edit]See also[edit]References[edit]Further reading[edit]External links[edit]Images of nuclear weapons[edit] The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ushered in the “atomic age”, and the bleak pictures of the bombed-out cities released shortly after the end of World War II became symbols of the power and destruction of the new weapons (it is worth noting that the first pictures released were only from distances, and did not contain any human bodies\u2014such pictures would only be released in later years).[2]The first pictures released of a nuclear explosion\u2014the blast from the Trinity test\u2014focused on the fireball itself; later pictures would focus primarily on the mushroom cloud that followed. After the United States began a regular program of nuclear testing in the late 1940s, continuing through the 1950s (and matched by the Soviet Union), the mushroom cloud has served as a symbol of the weapons themselves.Pictures of nuclear weapons themselves (the actual casings) were not made public until 1960, and even those were only mock-ups of the “Fat Man” and “Little Boy” weapons dropped on Japan\u2014not the more powerful weapons developed more recently. Diagrams of the general principles of operation of thermonuclear weapons have been available in very general terms since at least 1969 in at least two encyclopedia articles, and open literature research into inertial confinement fusion has been at least richly suggestive of how the “secondary” and “inter” stages of thermonuclear weapons work.[3] (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4In general, however, the design of nuclear weapons has been the most closely guarded secret until long after the secrets had been independently developed\u2014or stolen\u2014by all the major powers and a number of lesser ones. It is generally possible to trace US knowledge of foreign progress in nuclear weapons technology by reading the US Department of Energy document “Restricted Data Declassification Decisions\u20141946 to the Present”[4] (although some nuclear weapons design data have been reclassified since concern about proliferation of nuclear weapons to “nth countries” increased in the late 1970s).However, two controversial publications breached this silence in ways that made many in the US and allied nuclear weapons community very anxious.Former nuclear weapons designer Theodore Taylor described how terrorists could, without using any classified information at all, design a working fission nuclear weapon to journalist John McPhee, who published this information in the best-selling book The Curve of Binding Energy in 1974.[5]In 1979 the US Department of Energy sued to suppress the publication of an article by Howard Morland in The Progressive magazine detailing design information on thermonuclear and fission nuclear weapons he was able to glean in conversations with officials at several DoE contractor plants active in manufacture of nuclear weapons components. Ray Kidder, a nuclear weapon designer testifying for Morland, identified several open literature sources for the information Morland repeated in his article,[3] while aviation historian Chuck Hansen produced a similar document for US Senator Charles Percy.[6] Morland and The Progressive won the case, and Morland published a book on his journalistic research for the article, the trial, and a technical appendix in which he “corrected” what he felt were false assumptions in his original article about the design of thermonuclear weapons in his book, The Secret That Exploded.[7] The concepts in Morland’s book are widely acknowledged in other popular-audience descriptions of the inner workings of thermonuclear weapons.During the 1950s, many countries developed large civil-defense programs designed to aid the populace in the event of nuclear warfare. These generally included drills for evacuation to fallout shelters, popularized through popular media such as the US film Duck and Cover. These drills, with their images of eerily empty streets and the activity of hiding from a nuclear bomb under a schoolroom desk, would later become symbols of the seemingly inescapable and common fate created by such weapons. Some Americans built back-yard fallout shelters, which would provide little protection from a direct hit, but would keep out wind-blown fallout, for a few days or weeks (Switzerland, which never acquired nuclear weapons, although it had the technological sophistication to do so long before Pakistan or North Korea, has built nuclear blast shelters that would protect most of its population from a nuclear war.)[8][9]After the development of hydrogen bombs in the 1950s, and especially after the massive and widely publicized Castle Bravo test accident by the United States in 1954, which spread nuclear fallout over a large area and resulted in the death of at least one Japanese fisherman, the idea of a “limited” or “survivable” nuclear war became increasingly replaced by a perception that nuclear war meant the potentially instant end of all civilization: in fact, the explicit strategy of the nuclear powers was called Mutual Assured Destruction. Nuclear weapons became synonymous with apocalypse, and as a symbol this resonated through the culture of nations with freedom of the press. Several popular novels\u2014such as Alas, Babylon and On the Beach\u2014portrayed the aftermath of nuclear war. Several science-fiction novels, such as A Canticle for Leibowitz, explored the long-term consequences. Stanley Kubrick’s film Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb satirically portrayed the events and the thinking that could begin a nuclear war.Nuclear weapons are also one of the main targets of peace organizations. The CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) was one of the main organisations campaigning against the “Bomb”. Its symbol, a combination of the semaphore symbols for “N” (nuclear) and “D” (disarmament), entered modern popular culture as an icon of peace.A limited number of Indian films depicting nuclear weapons and technology have been made and these mostly show nuclear weapons in a negative light especially in the hand of non-state actors. Atom Bomb (1947) by Homi Wadia, one of the first Indian films involving nuclear technology, is about a man with enhanced physical strength due to the effects of a nuclear weapons test.[10] Indian films involving non-state actors and nuclear weapons include Agent Vinod (1977) by Deepak Bahry and a 2012 film of the same name by Sriram Raghavan, Vikram (1986) by Rajasekhar, Mr. India (1987) by Shekhar Kapoor, Tirangaa (1993) by Mehul Kumar, The Hero: Love Story of a Spy (2003) by Anil Sharma, Fanaa (2006) by Kunal Kohli, and Tiger Zinda Hai (2017) by Ali Abbas Zafar.[10][11] Other Indian films covering nuclear weapons include Hava Aney Dey (2004) by Partho Sen-Gupta about a future nuclear war between India and Pakistan and Parmanu: The Story of Pokhran (2018) by Abhishek Sharma \u2013 the first nuclear historical film in India about the Pokhran-II Indian nuclear weapons tests.[11]Sacred Games, an Indian Netflix series based on the novel of the same name, involves the acquirement of a nuclear bomb by an apocalyptic cult who plans to blow it up in Mumbai.[11]See also[edit]References[edit]^ Professor Ferenc M. Szasz and Issei Takechi, “Atomic Heroes and Atomic Monsters: American and Japanese Cartoonists Confront the Onset of the Nuclear Age, 1945\u201380”, The Historian 69.4 (Winter 2007): 728-752.^ Paul S. Boyer. By the Bomb’s Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (New York: Pantheon, 1985). pp. 5, 8\u20139, 207^ a b “Kidder-Bethe Correspondence Concerning The Progressive Case, 1979”. fas.org.^ ““Restricted Data Declassification Decisions\u20141946 to the Present”“ (PDF).^ John McPhee, The Curve of Binding Energy, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1974. ISBN\u00a00-374-13373-5^ “The Hansen Letter” (PDF) \u2013 via Federation of American Scientists.^ Howard Morland, The Secret That Exploded, Random House, 1981. ISBN\u00a00-394-51297-9^ Freeman J. Dyson, Weapons and Hope, HarperCollins, 1984. ISBN\u00a00-06-039031-X^ Nigel Calder, Nuclear Nightmares: Investigations into Possible Wars, Penguin (non-classics), 1981. ISBN\u00a00-14-005867-2^ a b Kaur, Raminder (2013-12-01). “The Nuclear Imaginary and Indian Popular Cinema”. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 36 (4): 539\u2013553. doi:10.1080\/00856401.2013.831393. ISSN\u00a00085-6401. S2CID\u00a0146295006.^ a b c Ramnath, Nandini. “‘Parmanu’ celebrates India’s nuclear programme, but our movies have not always loved the bomb”. Scroll.in.Further reading[edit]Paul S. Boyer. By the Bomb’s Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (New York: Pantheon, 1985).Margot A. Henriksen, Dr. Strangelove’s America: society and culture in the atomic age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), ISBN\u00a00-520-08310-5, LoC E169.12.H49 1997.Louis Menand, “Fat Man: Herman Kahn and the Nuclear Age”, The New Yorker, June 27, 2005Stephen Petersen, “Explosive Propositions: Artists React to the Atomic Age” in Science in Context v.14 no.4 (2004), p.\u00a0579-609.Jerome F. Shapiro, Atomic Bomb Cinema (New York: Routledge, 2002).“Reflections: The Cleve Cartmill Affair” by Robert SilverbergSpencer R. Weart, Nuclear fear: a history of images (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988); The Rise of nuclear fear (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012)Stableford, Brian (2006). “Atom Bomb”. Science Fact and Science Fiction: An Encyclopedia. Taylor & Francis. pp.\u00a047\u201351. ISBN\u00a0978-0-415-97460-8.Allan M. Winkler, Life Under a Cloud: American Anxiety About the Atom (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).External links[edit]The Hansen Letter\u2014The Federation of American Scientists Web page on the letter from aviation historian Chuck Hansen to Senator Charles Percy on open-literature knowledge about the design of thermonuclear weapons prior to Howard Morland’s article in The Progressive magazine which the US Department of Energy sought to suppress in a 1979 court caseUS Department of Energy document RDD-8, “Restricted Data Declassification Decisions: 1946 to the Present”, the official account of which nuclear weapons design information has been or should be declassified and placed in the public domain.The Federation of American Scientists Web page on the Kidder-Bethe correspondence on the US v. Progressive magazine, et al. case, in which nuclear weapons designer Ray Kidder lists several open literature sources available before 1978 which may have revealed how radiation implosion works in thermonuclear weapon secondary and inter stages.“The Bomb Project” Archived 2019-01-07 at the Wayback Machine, includes section relating to nuclear imagery in artTop 10 “NUKES of HOLLYWOOD” Moments, a countdown list of nuclear explosions in Hollywood movies.“Conelrad”, a sardonic look at the Cold War culture of the fifties and sixties“Nuke Pop” Archived 2006-06-17 at the Wayback Machine, page on nuclear weapons in popular culture by Paul Brians, a professor of English at Washington State UniversityGround Zero: A Javascript simulation of the effects of a nuclear explosion in a cityNuclear Holocausts: Atomic War in Fiction, By Paul Brians, Professor of English, Washington State University, Pullman, WashingtonAnnotated bibliography on nuclear weapons in popular culture from the Alsos Digital Library Archived 2008-02-04 at the Wayback Machine (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4"},{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki41\/nuclear-weapons-in-popular-culture\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Nuclear weapons in popular culture"}}]}]