[{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki43\/2020-united-states-presidential-election-in-wisconsin\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki43\/2020-united-states-presidential-election-in-wisconsin\/","headline":"2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin","name":"2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin","description":"before-content-x4 Election in Wisconsin 2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin Turnout 72.3% County results Precinct results after-content-x4 Biden \u00a0\u00a030\u201340%","datePublished":"2021-07-15","dateModified":"2021-07-15","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki43\/author\/lordneo\/#Person","name":"lordneo","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki43\/author\/lordneo\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9645c498c9701c88b89b8537773dd7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c9645c498c9701c88b89b8537773dd7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/wiki4\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/download.jpg","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/b\/b0\/Increase2.svg\/11px-Increase2.svg.png","url":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/b\/b0\/Increase2.svg\/11px-Increase2.svg.png","height":"11","width":"11"},"url":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki43\/2020-united-states-presidential-election-in-wisconsin\/","wordCount":35807,"articleBody":"     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});before-content-x4Election in Wisconsin2020 United States presidential election in WisconsinTurnout72.3%  County results Precinct results       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4Biden\u00a0\u00a030\u201340%\u00a0\u00a040\u201350%       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4\u00a0\u00a050\u201360%\u00a0\u00a060\u201370%\u00a0\u00a070\u201380%\u00a0\u00a080\u201390%       (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4\u00a0\u00a090\u2013100%Trump\u00a0\u00a030\u201340%\u00a0\u00a040\u201350%\u00a0\u00a050\u201360%\u00a0\u00a060\u201370%\u00a0\u00a070\u201380%\u00a0\u00a080\u201390%\u00a0\u00a090\u2013100%Tie\/No Data\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The 2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin was held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, as part of the 2020 United States presidential election in which all 50 states plus the District of Columbia participated.[1]Wisconsin voters chose electors to represent them in the Electoral College via a popular vote, pitting the Republican Party’s nominee, incumbent President Donald Trump, and running mate Vice President Mike Pence against Democratic Party nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his running mate California Senator Kamala Harris. Wisconsin has 10 electoral votes in the Electoral College.[2]The 2020 Democratic National Convention was scheduled to be held at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, but it was moved to the nearby Wisconsin Center due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[3][4]Polls of Wisconsin in the lead-up to election day showed a clear Biden lead, averaging in the high single digits. Prior to election day, most news organizations considered that the state was leaning towards Biden. Wisconsin was ultimately won by Biden by a narrow 0.63% margin over Trump, who had won it in 2016 by 0.77% against Hillary Clinton; however, Biden carried the state with a slightly larger margin than Al Gore or John Kerry did in either 2000 or 2004, respectively. Once again, Trump massively outperformed his polling average, which had Biden up 8.4 points in the state, but it was not enough to win it. Trump held his own in counties in northern Wisconsin and also in the WOW counties.[5] Biden became the first Democrat to win the White House without the once-strongly Democratic counties of Kenosha and Forest since Woodrow Wilson in 1916 as well as the first to win without Pepin County since 1944. However, Biden won the highest vote share for a Democrat in Waukesha County, at 38.8%, since Jimmy Carter in 1976.[6] Trump carried Brown County, which is Republican-leaning but competitive, though Biden won the city of Green Bay and improved on Clinton’s margin in the county at large by about 3.7 points.[7] Biden won back Sauk County, a county in the driftless region of southwestern Wisconsin; Biden also flipped Door County, which has voted for the winning candidate in each election since 1980, save for 1992.On November 18, Trump announced that he would request a recount in Milwaukee County and Dane County.[8][9] On November 29, both counties re-affirmed Biden’s victory, giving him a net gain of 87 votes over Trump.[10]With Ohio, Florida, and Iowa backing the losing candidate for the first time since 1960, 1992, and 2000 respectively, this election established Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania as the states with the longest bellwether streak still in effect today. The last time any of them voted against the winning candidate was 2004, when all three voted for losing Democrat John Kerry.Wisconsin voted 3.77% more Republican than the nation-at-large. This is the first time since 2004 that Wisconsin did not vote for the same candidate as neighboring Iowa.Table of ContentsPrimary elections[edit]Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic[edit]Democratic primary[edit]Republican primary[edit]General election[edit]Final predictions[edit]Polling[edit]Graphical summary[edit]Aggregate polls[edit]2020 polls[edit]2019 polls[edit]Former candidates and hypothetical polling[edit]Green Party and Kanye West ballot access lawsuits[edit]Electoral slates[edit]Results[edit]By county[edit]Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic[edit]By congressional district[edit]Edison exit polls[edit]Analysis[edit]Aftermath[edit]Electors[edit]See also[edit]References[edit]Further reading[edit]External links[edit]Primary elections[edit]Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic[edit]Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, several states had delayed their scheduled primaries and extended the vote-by-mail period. Concerns were raised by health officials, poll workers, and voters that in-person voting at the height of the pandemic would be unsafe for vulnerable individuals.[11] Democratic Governor Tony Evers initially signed an executive order for all-mail-in election, but the order was rejected by the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Legislature.[12]On April 2, although U.S. District Judge William M. Conley refused to postpone the election, he extended the deadline for absentee voting to April 13 (ordering clerks not to release any election data before that date).[13][14] However, on April 6, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Conley’s decision, meaning that all absentee ballots still had to be postmarked by “election day, Tuesday, April 7” even though it was still acceptable for the ballots to be received by the clerks as late as April 13.[15][16] The Supreme Court of the United States “did not alter the provision in Conley’s amended order which prohibits the reporting of results until April 13”.[17]Governor Evers then called a special session of the legislature to postpone in-person voting, but the session ended within minutes without action, forcing the primary to go on as planned.[18] Despite having previously expressed the view that he would violate the law by doing so,[19] on April 6, Evers issued an executive order which, if enforced, would have postponed the April 7 elections until the tentative date of June 9.[20][21] Republican leaders immediately announced that they would challenge the order in the Wisconsin Supreme Court.[20] The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that Evers did not have the authority to postpone the elections, thus meaning that Evers’ executive order was nullified, and that the elections would be held as scheduled on April 7.[22] This was appealed to a federal court who sided with the governor, and that was appealed to the US Supreme Court, which on a 5\u20134 vote, upheld the state court’s ruling.[23]Voting was somewhat chaotic, with people waiting in the rain for hours in some cases in masks and social distancing.[24] However, by the time the election concluded, Milwaukee Election Commissioner Neil Albrecht stated that despite some of the problems, the in-person voting ran smoothly.[25]Democratic primary[edit]2020 Wisconsin Democratic presidential primary[26]CandidateVotes[27]%Delegates[28]Joe Biden581,46362.8656Bernie Sanders293,44131.7228Elizabeth Warren (withdrawn)14,0601.52Michael Bloomberg (withdrawn)8,8460.96Amy Klobuchar (withdrawn)6,0790.66Tulsi Gabbard (withdrawn)5,5650.60Pete Buttigieg (withdrawn)4,9460.53Andrew Yang (withdrawn)3,3490.36Tom Steyer (withdrawn)8360.09John Delaney (withdrawn)5290.06Michael Bennet (withdrawn)4750.05Deval Patrick (withdrawn)3110.03Write-in votes1,5750.17Uninstructed Delegate3,5900.39Total925,065100%84Republican primary[edit]Incumbent President Donald Trump ran unopposed in the Republican primary, and thus received all of Wisconsin’s 52 delegates to the 2020 Republican National Convention.[29]2020 Wisconsin Republican primaryCandidateVotes%DelegatesDonald Trump616,78097.87%52Adam Nicholas Paul (write-in)2460.04%Uninstructed11,2461.78%Scattering1,9240.31%Total630,196100%52General election[edit]Final predictions[edit]Polling[edit]Graphical summary[edit]Aggregate polls[edit]2020 polls[edit]Poll sourceDate(s)administeredSamplesize[b]Marginof errorDonaldTrumpRepublicanJoeBidenDemocraticJoJorgensenLibertarianHowieHawkinsGreenOtherUndecidedSurveyMonkey\/AxiosOct 20 \u2013 Nov 22,814 (LV)\u00b1\u00a02.5%44%[c]54%––\u2013\u2013Research Co.Oct 31 \u2013 Nov 1450 (LV)\u00b1 4.6%45%54%––1%[d]7%Change Research\/CNBCOct 29 \u2013 Nov 1553 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.17%45%53%2%–\u20130%Civiqs\/Daily KosOct 29 \u2013 Nov 1789 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.6%47%51%––1%[d]0%Swayable Archived November 13, 2020, at the Wayback MachineOct 27 \u2013 Nov 1253 (LV)\u00b1\u00a08.2%45%55%1%–\u2013\u2013Ipsos\/ReutersOct 27 \u2013 Nov 1696 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.2%43%[e]53%2%0%2%[f]\u201343%[g]53%––2%[h]2%45%[i]53%––2%[j]\u2013AtlasIntelOct 30\u201331781 (LV)\u00b1 3%49%51%––\u20131%Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc.\/Center for American Greatness[A]Oct 29\u201331450 (LV)\u00b1 4.6%46%49%––2%[k]1%Morning ConsultOct 22\u2013311,002 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03%41%54%––\u2013\u2013Emerson CollegeOct 29\u201330751 (LV)\u00b1 3.1%45%[l]52%––2%[m]\u2013AtlasIntelOct 29\u201330672 (LV)\u00b1 4%50%49%––2%\u2013CNN\/SSRSOct 29\u201330873 (LV)\u00b1 3.9%44%52%3%–0%[n]2%Siena College\/NYT UpshotOct 26\u2013301,253 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.2%41%52%2%–1%[o]4%[p]Redfield & Wilton StrategiesOct 26\u201329800 (LV)\u201341%53%2%–1%2%SurveyMonkey\/AxiosOct 1\u2013284,569 (LV)\u00b1 2.0%43%55%––\u2013\u2013SwayableOct 23\u201326313 (LV)\u00b1 7.2%45%54%1%–\u2013\u2013Ipsos\/ReutersOct 20\u201326664 (LV)\u00b1 4.3%44%[e]53%2%1%3%[q]\u201344%[g]53%––2%[h]2%Trafalgar GroupOct 24\u2013251,082 (LV)\u00b1 2.89%47%47%3%–1%[d]1%Marquette Law SchoolOct 21\u201325749 (LV)\u00b1 4.4%43%48%2%–7%[r]0%ABC\/Washington PostOct 20\u201325809 (LV)\u00b1 4%40%57%2%–1%[s]1%Gravis MarketingOct 23677 (LV)\u00b1 3.8%43%54%––\u20133%YouGov\/University of Wisconsin-MadisonOct 13\u201321647 (LV)\u00b1 4.07%44%53%––3%[t]\u2013Fox NewsOct 17\u2013201,037 (LV)\u00b1 3%44%49%2%–1%[u]4%RMG Research\/PoliticalIQ Archived October 23, 2020, at the Wayback MachineOct 14\u201320800 (LV)\u00b1 3.5%44%[e]50%––3%[v]4%42%[w]52%––3%[v]4%45%[x]48%––3%[v]4%Morning ConsultOct 11\u2013201,038 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03%42%54%––\u2013\u2013Susquehanna Polling and Research Inc.\/Center for American Greatness[A]Oct 16\u201319500 (LV)\u00b1 4.3%45%45%5%–3%[y]3%Change Research\/CNBCOct 16\u201319447 (LV)[z]\u201344%52%––\u2013\u2013Latino Decisions\/DFER[B]Oct 14\u201319400 (LV)\u00b1 5%45%50%––\u20134%Ipsos\/ReutersOct 13\u201319663 (LV)\u00b1 4.3%45%[e]51%2%0%3%[aa]\u201343%[g]51%––3%[ab]3%Trafalgar GroupOct 14\u2013161,051 (LV)\u00b1 2.94%46%48%2%–1%3%YouGov\/CBSOct 13\u2013161,112 (LV)\u00b1 3.5%45%50%––3%[ac]2%Trafalgar Group\/Restoration PAC[C]Oct 11\u2013131,043 (LV)\u00b1 2.95%45%47%3%\u20132%[m]3%Redfield & Wilton StrategiesOct 10\u201313691 (LV)\u201340%[z]53%2%0%\u2013\u2013David Binder Research\/Focus on Rural AmericaOct 10\u201313200 (LV)\u201343%53%––\u2013\u2013Civiqs\/Rust Belt Rising[D]Oct 8\u201311560 (LV)\u00b1 4.4%45%53%––2%[m]1%Siena College\/NYT UpshotOct 8\u201311789 (LV)\u00b1 4%41%51%3%–0%[ad]5%[p]Ipsos\/ReutersOct 6\u201311577 (LV)\u00b1 4.7%45%[e]51%2%0%1%[q]\u201344%[g]51%––3%[ab]2%Morning ConsultOct 2\u2013111,067 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03%44%51%––\u2013\u2013Redfield & Wilton StrategiesOct 9\u201310613 (LV)\u201345%[z]49%2%–\u2013\u2013Baldwin Wallace UniversitySep 30 \u2013 Oct 8883 (LV)\u00b1 3.4%43%49%2%0%1%[ae]6%Redfield & Wilton StrategiesOct 4\u20137688 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.74%41%51%1%–1%[af]6%Ipsos\/ReutersSep 29 \u2013 Oct 5601 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.6%44%50%––2%[h]4%Change Research\/CNBCOct 2\u20134442 (LV)\u201344%51%––\u2013\u2013Marquette Law School[1]Sep 30 \u2013 Oct 4805 (RV)\u201341%46%5%–7%[ag]2%700 (LV)42%47%4%–2%[ah]1%SurveyMonkey\/AxiosSep 1\u2013303,806 (LV)\u201344%53%––\u20132%Trafalgar Group\/Restoration PAC[C]Sep 25\u2013281,084 (LV)\u00b1 2.89%44%47%3%–2%[ai]3%Redfield & Wilton StrategiesSep 23\u201327663 (LV)\u00b1 3.81%43%48%2%–0%[aj]7%Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc.\/Center for American Greatness[A]Sep 23\u201326500 (LV)\u00b1 4.3%46%48%––\u2013\u2013Trafalgar Group (R)Sep 22\u2013241,189 (LV)\u00b1 2.76%45%48%3%–2%[ai]3%Marist College\/NBCSep 20\u201324727 (LV)\u00b1 4.6%44%54%––1%1%Baldwin Wallace UniversitySep 9\u201322863 (LV)\u00b1 3.7%41%50%2%0%1%[ae]6%YouGov\/UW-Madison Elections ResearchCenter\/Wisconsin State JournalSep 10\u201321664 (LV)\u201346%50%––\u2013\u2013Change Research\/CNBCSep 18\u201320571 (LV)\u201342%51%––\u2013\u2013Hart Research Associates\/Human Rights Campaign[permanent dead link][E]Sep 17\u201319400 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.9%44%51%––\u2013\u2013Redfield & Wilton StrategiesSep 12\u201316636 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.89%41%47%1%1%1%[af]10%Ipsos\/ReutersSep 11\u201316609 (LV)\u201343%48%––2%[h]6%Morning ConsultSep 7\u201316800 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%42%[ak]51%––\u2013\u2013Civiqs\/Rust Belt Rising[D]Sep 11\u201315549 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.9%44%[z]51%––2%[m]2%Morning ConsultSep 6\u201315800 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%42%51%––\u2013\u2013CNN\/SSRSSep 9\u201313816 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.2%42%52%3%–1%[al]1%ABC\/Washington PostSep 8\u201313605 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.5%46%52%––1%[am]1%Siena College\/NYT UpshotSep 8\u201310760 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.7%43%48%2%0%2%[an]6%[p]Emerson CollegeSep 6\u20138823 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.4%45%[l]52%––4%[ao]\u2013Benenson Strategy Group\/GS Group\/AARPAug 28 \u2013 Sep 81,200 (LV)\u00b1\u00a02.8%45%50%––1%[ap]4%Change Research\/CNBCSep 4\u20136501 (LV)\u201344%50%––6%[aq]\u2013Morning ConsultAug 27 \u2013 Sep 5763 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%44%50%––\u2013\u2013YouGov\/CBSSep 2\u20134978 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.7%44%50%––2%[ar]4%Redfield & Wilton StrategiesAug 30 \u2013 Sep 4670 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.78%41%50%2%0%0%[aj]6%Marquette Law SchoolAug 30 \u2013 Sep 3688 (LV)\u201344%48%4%–2%[as]2%Pulse Opinion Research\/Rasmussen ReportsSep 1\u201321,000 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03%43%51%––3%[at]2%Fox NewsAug 29 \u2013 Sep 1801 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%42%50%2%\u20131%[au]5%853 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03%41%49%2%\u20132%[av]5%SurveyMonkey\/AxiosAug 1\u2013311,913 (LV)\u201349%48%––\u20132%Opinium\/The Guardian[2]Aug 21\u201328700 (LV)\u201340%53%––1%5%Morning ConsultAug 17\u201326797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%42%52%––\u2013\u2013Change Research\/CNBCAug 21\u201323925 (LV)\u201344%49%––\u2013\u2013Trafalgar GroupAug 14\u2013231,011 (LV)\u00b1\u00a02.99%46%45%4%–2%[aw]3%Hodas & Associates\/Restoration PAC[C]Aug 17\u201320600 (LV)\u201344%52%––\u20134%Redfield and Wilton StrategiesAug 13\u201317672 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.9%40%49%1%1%2%[ax]7%Civiqs\/Rust Belt Rising[D]Aug 13\u201317753 (RV)\u201345%51%––2%[m]2%Morning ConsultAug 7\u201316788 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%43%[ay]49%––2%[m]5%Morning ConsultAug 4\u201313797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%43%50%––\u2013\u2013Change Research\/CNBCAug 6\u20139384 (LV)\u201343%47%––\u2013\u2013Marquette Law SchoolAug 4\u20139694 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.8%46%50%––3%[az]1%YouGov\/CBSAug 4\u20137994 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.8%42%48%––3%[ac]7%Pulse Opinion Research\/Rasmussen Reports\/American Greatness PAC[permanent dead link][A]Aug 5\u20136750 (LV)\u201343%55%––1%1%YouGov\/University of Wisconsin-MadisonJul 27 \u2013 Aug 6734 (RV)\u00b1\u00a04.9%43%49%––4%[ba]4%OnMessage Inc.\/Heritage Action[F]Aug 2\u20134400 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.7%47%47%––\u20136%Morning ConsultJul 25 \u2013 Aug 3797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%41%51%––\u2013\u2013David Binder ResearchJul 30\u201331200 (LV)\u201342%53%––\u2013\u2013SurveyMonkey\/AxiosJul 1\u2013312,173 (LV)\u201348%50%––\u20132%Hodas & Associates\/Restoration PAC[C]Jul 22\u201327600 (LV)\u201338%52%––\u201310%Change Research\/CNBC[3]Jul 24\u201326392 (LV)\u201343%48%––\u2013\u2013Redfield & Wilton StrategiesJul 19\u201324742 (LV)\u201335%45%2%0%3%[bb]15%Morning ConsultJul 15\u201324797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%44%49%––\u2013\u2013Gravis MarketingJul 22796 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%42%50%––\u20137%Global Strategy Group (D) Archived August 7, 2020, at the Wayback MachineJul 11\u201317600 (V)\u00b1\u00a04.0%42%51%––2%[bc]4%[p]Spry Strategies\/American Principles Project[G]Jul 11\u201316700 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.7%45%46%––\u20138%Morning ConsultJul 5\u201314797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%41%50%––\u2013\u2013Change Research\/CNBCJul 10\u201312601 (LV)\u201342%48%––\u2013\u2013Morning ConsultJun 25 \u2013 Jul 4797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%44%50%––\u2013\u2013SurveyMonkey\/AxiosJun 8\u201330813 (LV)\u201347%51%––\u20132%Change Research\/CNBCJun 26\u201328502 (LV)[z]\u201343%51%––\u2013\u2013Trafalgar GroupJun 25\u2013261,021 (LV)\u00b1 3.0%46%45%––8%[bd]2%Ogden & FryJun 20\u201324825 (LV)\u00b1 3.48%44%45%––\u201310%Morning ConsultJun 15\u201324797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%44%50%––\u2013\u2013Redfield & Wilton StrategiesJun 14\u201319846 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.37%36%45%1%1%2%[be]15%Marquette Law SchoolJun 14\u201318686 (LV)\u201344%52%––3%[az]1%Hodas & Associates\/Restoration PAC (R)Jun 12\u201316600 (LV)\u00b1 4.0%39%55%––\u20136%NYT Upshot\/Siena CollegeJun 8\u201315655 (RV)\u00b1\u00a04.3%38%49%––5%[bf]8%Morning ConsultJun 5\u201314797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%44%49%––\u2013\u2013Change Research\/CNBCJun 12\u201314231 (LV)[z]\u201344%48%––5%[bg]\u2013Morning ConsultMay 26 \u2013 Jun 4797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%44%48%––\u2013\u2013Fox NewsMay 30 \u2013 Jun 2801 (RV)\u00b1 3.5%40%49%––6%[bh]5%Change Research\/CNBCMay 29\u201331382 (LV)[z]\u201345%45%––5%6%Morning ConsultMay 16\u201325797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%44%48%––\u2013\u2013Morning ConsultMay 6\u201315797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%42%49%––\u2013\u2013Redfield & Wilton StrategiesMay 10\u201314875 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.3%38%48%––3%[bi]10%Hodas & Associates\/Restoration PAC (R)May 6\u20138600 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03%42%51%––\u20138%Marquette Law SchoolMay 3\u20137650 (LV)\u201345%49%––4%[bj]2%Morning ConsultApr 26 \u2013 May 5797 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%43%49%––\u2013\u2013Public Policy Polling[H]Apr 20\u2013211,415 (RV)\u201345%50%––\u20134%IpsosApr 15\u201320645 (RV)\u00b1\u00a05.0%40%43%––\u2013\u2013Hodas & Associates\/Restoration PAC (R)Apr 13\u201315600 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.0%45%50%––\u20134%Hart Research\/CAP Action[I]Apr 6\u20138303 (RV)\u201347%48%––2%3%Marquette Law SchoolMar 24\u201329813 (RV)\u201345%48%––4%[bj]3%Baldwin Wallace University Great LakesMar 17\u201325822 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.8%45%45%––\u201310%Change ResearchMar 21\u201323510 (LV)\u201349%45%–\u20136%Hodas & Associates\/Restoration PAC (R)Mar 17\u201319600 (RV)\u201349%45%––\u2013\u2013Public Policy PollingMar 10\u2013111,727 (RV)\u201345%48%––\u20136%YouGov\/Yahoo NewsMar 6\u20138459 (RV)\u201342%44%––6%[bk]7%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimus Archived March 20, 2020, at the Wayback MachineMar 5\u20137502 (LV)\u00b1 4.7%45%43%––\u2013\u2013Marquette Law SchoolFeb 19\u2013231,000 (RV)\u201346%46%––5%[bl]3%YouGovFeb 11\u201320936 (RV)\u00b1 4.0%43%45%––\u2013\u2013Quinnipiac University Archived May 13, 2020, at the Wayback MachineFeb 12\u201318823 (RV)\u00b1 3.4%49%42%––4%[bm]4%Expedition Strategies\/Progressive Policies InstituteFeb 6\u201318500 (RV)\u201344%42%––\u201313%Tarrance Group\/Wisconsin Manufacturers and CommerceJan 14\u201316500 (LV)\u00b1 4.5%46%47%––\u20136%Marquette Law School[4][5]Jan 8\u201312701 (LV)\u201347%48%––4%[bj]2%Fox NewsJan 5\u201381,504 (RV)\u00b1\u00a02.5%41%46%––8%[bn]4%2019 polls[edit]Former candidates and hypothetical polling[edit]Former candidatesDonald Trump vs. Michael BloombergDonald Trump vs. Cory BookerDonald Trump vs. Pete ButtigiegPoll sourceDate(s)administeredSamplesize[b]Marginof errorDonaldTrump (R)PeteButtigieg (D)OtherUndecidedMarquette Law SchoolFeb 19\u201323, 20201,000 (RV)\u201345%45%5%[bs]5%YouGovFeb 11\u201320, 2020936 (RV)\u00b1 4.0%43%45%\u2013\u2013Quinnipiac University Archived May 13, 2020, at the Wayback MachineFeb 12\u201318, 2020823 (RV)\u00b1 3.4%49%41%5%[bw]5%Expedition Strategies\/Progressive Policies InstituteFeb 6\u201318, 2020500 (RV)\u201343%44%\u201313%Marquette Law School[15][16]Jan 8\u201312, 2020701 (LV)\u201347%45%5%[bq]4%Fox NewsJan 5\u20138, 20201,504 (RV)\u00b1\u00a02.5%41%42%10[bx]7%Marquette Law School[17]Dec 3\u20138, 2019652 (LV)\u201347%44%4%[by]4%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimusDec 3\u20135, 2019610 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.1%49%38%8%[bp]5%[p]Marquette Law School[18][19]Nov 13\u201317, 2019685 (LV)\u201348%40%7%[bz]6%Marquette Law School[20][21]Oct 13\u201317, 2019657 (LV)\u201344%46%5%[ca]4%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimusJun 11\u201313, 2019535 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.3%41%39%20%\u2013Zogby AnalyticsApr 15\u201318, 2019802 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%41%44%\u201316%Donald Trump vs. Kamala HarrisPoll sourceDate(s)administeredSamplesize[b]Marginof errorDonaldTrump (R)KamalaHarris (D)OtherUndecidedMarquette Law School[22]Aug 25\u201329, 2019672 (LV)\u201346%46%5%[bq]4%Zogby AnalyticsApr 15\u201318, 2019802 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%42%43%\u201314%Emerson CollegeMar 15\u201317, 2019775 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%50%50%\u2013\u2013Donald Trump vs. Amy KlobucharDonald Trump vs. Beto O’RourkeDonald Trump vs. Bernie SandersPoll sourceDate(s)administeredSamplesize[b]Marginof errorDonaldTrump (R)BernieSanders (D)OtherUndecidedMarquette Law SchoolMar 24\u201329, 2020813 (RV)\u201347%45%6%[bs]2%Baldwin Wallace University Great LakesMar 17\u201325, 2020822 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.8%46%42%\u201312%Hodas & Associates\/Restoration PAC (R)Mar 17\u201319, 2020600 (RV)\u201350%43%\u2013\u2013Public Policy PollingMar 10\u201311, 20201,727 (V)\u201346%48%\u20137%YouGov\/Yahoo NewsMar 6\u20138, 2020459 (RV)\u201340%46%9%[cb]5%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimus Archived March 20, 2020, at the Wayback MachineMar 5\u20137, 2020502 (LV)\u00b1 4.7%48%42%\u2013\u2013Marquette Law SchoolFeb 19\u201323, 20201,000 (RV)\u201346%48%3%[bj]3%YouGovFeb 11\u201320, 2020936 (RV)\u00b1 4.0%44%46%\u2013\u2013Quinnipiac University Archived May 13, 2020, at the Wayback MachineFeb 12\u201318, 2020823 (RV)\u00b1 3.4%50%43%4%[bm]4%Expedition Strategies\/Progressive Policies InstituteFeb 6\u201318, 2020500 (RV)\u201346%45%\u20139%Tarrance Group\/Wisconsin Manufacturers and CommerceJan 14\u201316, 2020500 (LV)\u00b1 4.5%47%47%\u20137%Marquette Law School[25][26]Jan 8\u201312, 2020701 (LV)\u201347%47%3%[br]1%Fox NewsJan 5\u20138, 20201,504 (RV)\u00b1\u00a02.5%42%46%8%[bn]4%Marquette Law School[27]Dec 3\u20138, 2019652 (LV)\u201348%46%4%[bj]1%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimusDec 3\u20135, 2019610 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.1%51%38%7%[bp]4%[p]Marquette Law School[28][29]Nov 13\u201317, 2019685 (LV)\u201349%45%5%[bq]1%NYT Upshot\/Siena CollegeOct 13\u201326, 2019651 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.4%46%47%\u2013\u2013Marquette Law School[30][31]Oct 13\u201317, 2019657 (LV)\u201345%48%4%[bl]2%Fox NewsSep 29 \u2013 Oct 2, 20191,512 (RV)\u00b1\u00a02.5%40%45%5%6%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimus Archived September 12, 2019, at the Wayback MachineSep 7\u20139, 2019534 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.0%43%49%8%\u2013Marquette Law School[32]Aug 25\u201329, 2019672 (LV)\u201346%48%4%[bj]1%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimusJun 11\u201313, 2019535 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.3%40%47%13%\u2013Zogby AnalyticsApr 15\u201318, 2019802 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%42%49%\u20139%Tulchin Research (D)[J]Apr 14\u201318, 2019400 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.9%42%52%\u2013\u2013Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimus Archived April 3, 2019, at the Wayback MachineMar 19\u201321, 2019616 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.1%41%48%7%\u2013Emerson CollegeMar 15\u201317, 2019775 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%48%52%\u2013\u2013Donald Trump vs. Elizabeth WarrenPoll sourceDate(s)administeredSamplesize[b]Marginof errorDonaldTrump (R)ElizabethWarren (D)OtherUndecidedMarquette Law SchoolFeb 19\u201323, 20201,000 (RV)\u201347%44%4%[bq]4%YouGovFeb 11\u201320, 2020936 (RV)\u00b1 4.0%44%46%\u2013\u2013Quinnipiac University Archived May 13, 2020, at the Wayback MachineFeb 12\u201318, 2020823 (RV)\u00b1 3.4%51%41%4%[bm]4%Marquette Law School[33][34]Jan 8\u201312, 2020701 (LV)\u201349%45%5%[bq]2%Fox NewsJan 5\u20138, 20201,504 (RV)\u00b1\u00a02.5%41%44%9%[cc]5%Marquette Law School[35]Dec 3\u20138, 2019652 (LV)\u201348%46%5%[bv]2%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimusDec 3\u20135, 2019610 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.1%50%37%8%[bp]5%[p]Marquette Law School[36][37]Nov 13\u201317, 2019685 (LV)\u201350%43%4%[bj]2%NYT Upshot\/Siena CollegeOct 13\u201326, 2019651 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.4%47%45%\u2013\u2013Marquette Law School[38][39]Oct 13\u201317, 2019657 (LV)\u201345%50%3%[br]1%Fox NewsSep 29 \u2013 Oct 2, 20191,512 (RV)\u00b1\u00a02.5%41%45%5%7%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimus Archived September 12, 2019, at the Wayback MachineSep 7\u20139, 2019534 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.0%42%43%15%\u2013Marquette Law School[40]Aug 25\u201329, 2019672 (LV)\u201346%48%4%[bj]3%Firehouse Strategies\/\u00d8ptimusJun 11\u201313, 2019535 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.3%41%41%18%\u2013Zogby AnalyticsApr 15\u201318, 2019802 (LV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%41%47%\u201312%Emerson CollegeMar 15\u201317, 2019775 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%48%52%\u2013\u2013Zogby AnalyticsAug 17\u201323, 2017603 (LV)\u00b1\u00a04.0%37%48%\u201315%Hypothetical pollingwith Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and Howard SchultzPoll sourceDate(s)administeredSamplesize[b]Marginof errorDonaldTrump (R)JoeBiden (D)HowardSchultz (I)UndecidedEmerson CollegeMar 15\u201317, 2019775 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%44%51%4%\u2013with Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Howard SchultzPoll sourceDate(s)administeredSamplesize[b]Marginof errorDonaldTrump (R)BernieSanders (D)HowardSchultz (I)UndecidedEmerson CollegeMar 15\u201317, 2019775 (RV)\u00b1\u00a03.5%46%48%5%\u2013with Donald Trump and generic Democratwith Donald Trump and generic OpponentGreen Party and Kanye West ballot access lawsuits[edit]In August 2020, the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission voted to keep rapper Kanye West, an independent presidential candidate, off of the 2020 general election ballot in a 5-1 decision on the basis that West’s application arrived too late\u2014arriving in person seconds after the deadline.[44]The Commission was split along party lines in a 3-3 decision to keep Howie Hawkins, the Green Party presidential candidate off of the 2020 general election ballot.[45] Hawkins gathered 3,623 valid signatures; however, forms with 1,834 signatures had a different address for Hawkins’ running mate Angela Walker. The partisan board voted only to certify the 1,789, placing Hawkins\/Walker below the 2,000 signatures required to be on the ballot.[46]Walker subsequently filed a legal petition to be included on the ballot. On September 10, 2020, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the election officials had to wait to mail absentee ballots until the court decided whether or not to include the Green Party on the ballot. Some municipal election commissions had already mailed out absentee ballots while others were concerned that they would miss the September 17 deadline by which Wisconsin state law required absentee ballots to mailed out to those who requested them.[47] On September 14, 2020, the court ruled that the ballots would remain as-is without Hawkins or West on the ballot stating, “given their delay in asserting their rights, we would be unable to provide meaningful relief without completely upsetting the election.”[48]Electoral slates[edit]These slates of electors were nominated by each party in order to vote in the Electoral College should their candidates win the state:[49]Results[edit]  Municipal Results\u00a0\u00a0Biden\u201440\u201350%\u00a0\u00a0Biden\u201450\u201360%\u00a0\u00a0Biden\u201460\u201370%\u00a0\u00a0Biden\u201470\u201380%\u00a0\u00a0Biden\u201480\u201390%\u00a0\u00a0Biden\u201490\u2013100%\u00a0\u00a0Trump\u201340\u201350%\u00a0\u00a0Trump\u201350\u201360%\u00a0\u00a0Trump\u201360\u201370%\u00a0\u00a0Trump\u201370\u201380%\u00a0\u00a0Trump\u201380\u201390%\u00a0\u00a0Trump\u201390\u2013100%\u00a0\u00a0Tie\u00a0\u00a0No VoteBetween 2016 and 2020, the number of voters in Milwaukee suburban counties voting for the Democratic presidential candidate increased.[51]By county[edit]Official results by county following recount.[52][cn]CountyBidenTrumpJorgensenOtherTotal%Vote%Vote%Vote%VoteAdams36.63%4,32962.29%7,3620.72%850.27%3211,818Ashland54.82%4,80143.86%3,8410.80%700.33%298,757Barron36.27%9,19462.35%15,8031.03%2620.30%7625,346Bayfield56.50%6,14742.44%4,6170.74%800.29%3210,880Brown45.49%65,51152.68%75,8711.27%1,8290.33%478144,017Buffalo36.59%2,86061.85%4,8341.02%800.40%317,816Burnett35.19%3,56963.72%6,4620.85%860.24%2410,141Calumet39.37%12,11659.00%18,1561.18%3630.41%12630,774Chippewa38.91%13,98359.32%21,3171.39%5010.31%11335,938Clark30.37%4,52467.14%10,0021.13%1681.23%18314,898Columbia48.45%16,41049.98%16,9271.24%4210.33%11133,869Crawford45.46%3,95353.13%4,6201.06%920.35%308,695Dane75.46%260,18522.85%78,8001.06%3,6680.39%1,330344,791Dodge33.77%16,35664.73%31,3551.10%5350.39%19048,436Door49.93%10,04448.48%9,7521.15%2310.29%5920,117Douglas53.56%13,21844.26%10,9231.54%3790.34%8424,677Dunn42.07%9,89756.00%13,1731.56%3680.37%8623,524Eau Claire54.26%31,62043.49%25,3411.59%9250.38%22358,275Florence26.56%78172.55%2,1330.75%220.14%42,940Fond du Lac35.96%20,58862.45%35,7541.20%6860.34%19457,251Forest34.06%1,72165.01%3,2850.69%350.16%85,053Grant42.95%10,99855.22%14,1421.37%3500.30%7825,608Green50.69%10,85147.51%10,1691.27%2710.38%8121,406Green Lake31.34%3,34467.17%7,1681.03%1100.25%2710,671Iowa55.95%7,82842.23%5,9091.15%1610.56%7813,992Iron38.23%1,53360.80%2,4380.65%260.20%84,010Jackson41.79%4,25656.86%5,7911.09%1110.26%2610,184Jefferson41.48%19,90456.71%27,2081.32%6340.26%12647,979Juneau34.62%4,74663.82%8,7491.06%1460.32%4413,709Kenosha47.55%42,19350.68%44,9721.17%1,0370.35%31288,738Kewaunee32.87%3,97665.54%7,9271.05%1270.39%4712,095La Crosse55.75%37,84642.25%28,6841.29%8770.43%29367,884Lafayette42.63%3,64756.35%4,8210.67%570.33%288,555Langlade33.18%3,70465.65%7,3300.84%940.33%3711,165Lincoln37.95%6,26160.72%10,0171.06%1750.27%4416,497Manitowoc37.52%16,81860.72%27,2181.23%5530.40%17944,829Marathon40.14%30,80858.14%44,6241.21%9290.35%26676,751Marinette32.06%7,36666.60%15,3041.03%2370.31%7222,979Marquette35.73%3,23963.09%5,7190.86%780.19%179,065Menominee81.95%1,30317.48%2780.38%60.19%31,590Milwaukee69.13%317,27029.27%134,3570.95%4,3400.38%1,753458,971Monroe37.30%8,43360.92%13,7751.16%2630.44%10022,611Oconto28.93%6,71569.89%16,2260.90%2100.28%6423,215Oneida41.83%10,10556.59%13,6711.17%2830.30%7324,159Outagamie44.13%47,66754.05%58,3851.45%1,5690.37%401108,022Ozaukee43.13%26,51755.15%33,9121.05%6470.33%20161,486Pepin35.93%1,48962.36%2,5841.23%510.48%204,144Pierce42.01%9,79654.96%12,8151.64%3831.22%28423,317Polk35.53%9,37062.99%16,6111.10%2890.38%10126,371Portage50.31%20,42847.53%19,2991.58%6400.42%16940,603Price35.48%3,03263.12%5,3941.15%980.26%228,546Racine47.12%50,15951.18%54,4791.13%1,2000.36%380106,451Richland44.32%3,99554.04%4,8711.13%1020.38%349,014Rock54.66%46,65843.51%37,1381.28%1,0940.34%29385,360Rusk31.92%2,51766.66%5,2571.08%850.28%227,886Sauk50.02%18,10848.32%17,4931.22%4410.44%16136,203Sawyer42.80%4,49856.22%5,9090.59%620.25%2610,510Shawano31.53%7,13167.09%15,1731.12%2530.26%5822,615Sheboygan41.06%27,10156.97%37,6091.36%8960.36%23866,011St. Croix40.89%23,19056.78%32,1991.55%8780.54%30756,707Taylor25.20%2,69371.65%7,6571.06%1132.06%22010,686Trempealeau40.86%6,28557.43%8,8331.15%1770.42%6415,380Vernon46.83%7,45751.61%8,2181.14%1820.39%6215,923Vilas38.41%5,90360.26%9,2610.90%1380.23%3615,369Walworth39.56%22,78958.77%33,8511.11%6410.34%19657,600Washburn37.26%3,86761.03%6,3341.19%1230.35%3610,378Washington30.26%26,65068.40%60,2371.07%9410.27%24288,070Waukesha38.77%103,90659.57%159,6491.13%3,0230.27%728267,996Waupaca33.31%9,70365.06%18,9521.23%3570.28%8329,130Waushara32.34%4,38866.45%9,0160.85%1150.36%4913,568Winnebago46.86%44,06050.83%47,7961.73%1,6290.38%35794,032Wood39.63%16,36558.86%24,3080.98%4030.34%14141,298Totals49.45%1,630,67348.83%1,610,0651.17%38,4910.62%10,1303,297,352  County Flips:  Democratic \u00a0\u00a0Hold\u00a0\u00a0Gain from Republican Republican \u00a0\u00a0HoldCounties that flipped from Republican to Democratic[edit]By congressional district[edit]Despite narrowly losing, Trump won 6 out of 8 congressional districts in Wisconsin, including one held by a Democrat.Edison exit polls[edit]2020 presidential election in Wisconsin by demographic subgroup (Edison exit polling)[53]Demographic subgroupBidenTrump% oftotal voteTotal vote49.448.899IdeologyLiberals91825Moderates603838Conservatives118836PartyDemocrats96432Republicans79337Independents544231GenderMen445450Women564350Race\/ethnicityWhite465286Black9286Latino60374Age18\u201324 years old6133825\u201329 years old5640530\u201339 years old52461440\u201349 years old53461450\u201364 years old46533265 and older475326Sexual orientationLGBT80165Heterosexual485195EducationHigh school or less445422Some college education494927Associate’s degree435616Bachelor’s degree524623Postgraduate degree683111IncomeUnder $30,000653115$30,000\u201349,999554420$50,000\u201399,999475238$100,000\u2013199,999435621Over $200,00045555Union householdsYes594014No485186Issue regarded as most importantRacial inequality91613Coronavirus881119Economy138535Crime and safety178213Health care81198RegionMilwaukee County692914Milwaukee Suburbs415822Dane County762310Fox River Valley\/N. Lakeshore435517Southwest475219North395917Area typeUrban693030Suburban435549Rural386022Family’s financial situation todayBetter than four years ago168339Worse than four years ago871221About the same633540Analysis[edit]Wisconsin has voted Republican in gubernatorial and senatorial elections a few times prior to 2016, but Wisconsin was still seen as a lean-Democratic state, as it had a blue streak going back to 1988 and had only gone Republican four times since 1964. As such, it made up part of the blue wall. Trump pulled off a surprise win in the state in 2016, in large part due to a collapse in support for Hillary Clinton in the state.Both the Democratic and Republican candidates improved on their performances in the state in 2020, with Trump achieving a record total number of votes for a Republican candidate in the state of Wisconsin, nearly matching George W. Bush’s 2004 performance in percentage. Conversely, Biden had the second most votes ever for a Democrat in Wisconsin, behind Obama’s performance in 2008. While Biden’s margin of victory was narrow (0.6%), and well behind Barack Obama’s performances, it was nonetheless wider than Al Gore’s 0.2% in 2000 and John Kerry’s 0.4% in 2004.Joe Biden received strong support in the city of Milwaukee, improving on Clinton’s 2016 performance by 3.6 points in its county; Biden received 92% and 60% of the black and Latino vote respectively, with most of that electorate living in Milwaukee County. Both candidates performed well in the state with whites, with Trump carrying whites overall by 6 points, though Biden performed better with college-educated whites. Cementing Biden’s victory was his strong performance in Dane County, which he carried by nearly 53 points. Biden would also carry La Crosse County by 13 points, Eau Claire County by 10 points, and flipped Sauk County and the bellwether Door County, while only losing Brown County by 7 points, winning the county seat Green Bay. Biden even made in-roads in Waukesha and Washington counties, nearly breaking 40% in the former and breaking 30% in the latter, though Trump still held these counties with large margins.On the other hand, Trump was able to hold much of the Driftless region in southwestern Wisconsin; many of these counties, such as Vernon, Crawford, and Grant were reliably Democratic during the latter half of the 20th century, but Trump maintained his results from 2016, solidifying a Republican shift in this part of the state. Additionally, Trump performed strongly in the more traditionally conservative northern counties of Wisconsin. Finally, Trump kept Kenosha County in his column, with both candidates improving there; Kenosha County is significant, as it was the site of the Jacob Blake shooting, which triggered nationwide protests. Biden thus became the first Democrat to win the presidency without carrying Kenosha County since Woodrow Wilson in 1916, and the first Democrat to win the presidency without carrying Pepin County since Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1944.In terms of partisan lean, Biden was able to win 7% of Republicans in the state, which is significant, as they voted in this cycle by about 5 points more than Democrats. More importantly, Biden won independent voters by 12 points; Hillary Clinton lost this bloc to Trump by 10 points in 2016.Aftermath[edit]On November 6, Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien said: “There have been reports of irregularities in several Wisconsin counties which raise serious doubts about the validity of the results.” No evidence of such “irregularities” has been provided by the Trump campaign.[54]On November 18, the Trump campaign wired nearly $3 million to the Wisconsin Election Commission in a petition for a partial recount of the 2020 presidential election results. The recount would take place in Milwaukee and Dane counties. “These two counties were selected because they are the locations of the worst irregularities,” the campaign claimed in a release.[55]Milwaukee certified its recount results on November 27, 2020, and led to Joe Biden gaining a net 132 votes. Dane certified its recount results on November 29, 2020, and led to Donald Trump gaining a net 45 votes. In total, the recount across the two counties led to Joe Biden increasing his lead by an additional 87 votes.In July 2022 the Wisconsin Supreme Court stated that despite their widespread use in the 2020 presidential election “ballot dropboxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes”.[56]Electors[edit]On November 30, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers certified Wisconsin’s electors for Biden.[57] The following electors all cast their vote for Biden:See also[edit]Voter samples and additional candidates^ Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Key:A \u2013 all adultsRV \u2013 registered votersLV \u2013 likely votersV \u2013 unclear^ Overlapping sample with the previous SurveyMonkey\/Axios poll, but more information available regarding sample size^ a b c “Someone else” with 1%^ a b c d e Standard VI response^ “Some other candidate” with 2%; West (B) and would not vote with 0%^ a b c d If only Biden, Trump and “some other candidate” were available^ a b c d “Some other candidate” with 2%; would not vote with 0%^ Results considering those who lean towards a given candidate among those initially predisposed towards abstention, indecision or a candidate besides Biden or Trump in the response section immediately above^ “Some other candidate” with 2%^ “Other” and “Refused\/would not vote” with 1%^ a b With voters who lean towards a given candidate^ a b c d e f “Someone else” with 2%^ “None of these” and “Other” with 0%^ “Someone else” with 1%; would not vote with 0%^ a b c d e f g h i Includes “Refused”^ a b “Some other candidate” with 1%; West (B) and would not vote with 0%^ “Refused” with 6%; “None\/other” with 1%; Did not vote with 0%^ “None of these” with 1%; “Other” with 0%; would not vote with no voters^ Includes Undecided^ “Other” with 1%; would not vote with no voters^ a b c “Some other candidate” with 3%^ Results generated with high Democratic turnout model^ Results generated with high Republican turnout model^ “Refused” with 2%; “Other” with 1%^ a b c d e f g Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight^ “Some other candidate” with 2%; West (B) with 1%; would not vote with 0%^ a b “Some other candidate” with 3%; would not vote with 0%^ a b “Someone else\/third party” with 3%^ “Someone else” and would not vote with 0%^ a b “Another candidate” with 1%^ a b “Another Third Party\/Write-in” with 1%^ “None\/other” with 2%; “refused” with 5%^ “None\/other” and “refused” with 1%^ a b “Another Party Candidate” with 2%^ a b “Another Third Party\/Write-in” with 0%^ Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding sampling period^ “None of these” with 1%; “Other” with 0%^ “Neither” with 1%; “Other” and would not vote with 0%^ “Someone else” and would not vote with 1%^ “Someone else” with 4%^ Would not vote with 1%^ “Other\/not sure” with 6%^ “Someone else\/third party” with 2%^ “Refused” with 2%; “None\/other” with 0%^ “Someone else” with 3%^ “Other” with 1%^ “Other” and would not vote with 1%^ “Another Party Candidate”^ “Another Third Party\/Write-in” and West (B) with 1%^ Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding third party and undecided voters^ a b c “Neither” with 2%; “refused” with 1%^ “Other” with 3%; would not vote with 1%^ West (B) with 2%; “Another Third Party\/Write-In” 1%^ “Other candidate” with 2%^ “Other party candidate” with 8%^ “Other” with 2%^ “Another candidate” with 3%; would not vote with 2%^ “Libertarian Party candidate\/Green Party candidate” with 5%^ “Other” with 4%; would not vote with 2%^ “Third party\/write-in” with 3%^ a b c d e f g h i “Neither” with 3%; “Refused” with 1%^ “Other” with 5%; would not vote with 1%^ a b c “Neither” with 4%; “Refused” with 0%^ a b c “Someone else” with 1%; would not vote with 3%^ a b “Other” with 6%; would not vote with 2%^ “Neither” with 1%; “refused” with 1%^ a b c d A third party candidate with 6%; would not vote with 2%^ a b c d e f “Neither” with 4%; “refused” with 1%^ a b c “Neither” with 3%; “refused” with 0%^ a b c d “Neither” with 5%; “refused” with 1%^ “Someone else” with 2%; would not vote with 3%^ A third party candidate with 8%; would not vote with 2%^ a b “Neither” with 3%; “refused” with 2%^ a b “Someone else” with 1%; would not vote with 4%^ “Other” with 7%; would not vote with 3%^ “Neither” with 2%; “refused” with 2%^ “Neither” with 5%; “refused” with 2%^ “Neither” with 5%; “refused” with 0%^ “Other” with 7%; would not vote with 2%^ “Other” with 6%; would not vote with 3%^ a b Figures for each candidate in this poll include undecided voters who were reported to lean towards that candidate at the time of polling.^ “It depends on who the Democrats nominate” with 1.9%; “unsure” with 0.9%^ “Third-party candidate” with 3%^ a b “Would probably or definitely vote for someone other than Trump” with 57%^ a b “Refused” with 0%^ Listed as “unlikely to vote for Trump” as opposed to “likely to vote for Trump”^ Jorgensen and Cohen were nominated by the Libertarian Party of Wisconsin but placed on the ballot as independents because the party did not have ballot access.^ Carroll and Cohen patel were nominated by the American Solidarity Party but placed on the ballot as independents because the party did not have ballot access.^ Hawkins and Walker were nominated by the Wisconsin Green Party but registered as independent write-in candidates because the party was not recognized by the Wisconsin Secretary of State.^ La Riva and Freeman were nominated by the Party for Socialism and Liberation but registered as independent write-in candidates because the party was not recognized by the Wisconsin Secretary of State.^ To view in other formats, see at Wisconsin’s Elections CommissionPartisan clients^ a b c d The Center for American Greatness is a pro-Trump organization^ This poll\u2019s sponsor, DFER, primarily supports Democratic candidates^ a b c d The Restoration PAC is a 501 non-profit which supports Donald Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign^ a b c Rust Belt Rising is affiliated with the Democratic Party^ The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Biden prior to this poll’s sampling period^ Heritage Action is the sister organisation of the Heritage Foundation, which exclusively endorses Republican candidates^ This poll’s sponsor is the American Principles Project, a 501(c)(4) organization that supports the Republican Party.^ Poll sponsored by Protect Our Care, a pro-Affordable Care Act organisation^ CAP Action is a political advocacy group that exclusively supports Democratic candidates^ Poll sponsored by the Sanders campaign^ Poll sponsored by Protect Our CareReferences[edit]^ Kelly, Ben (August 13, 2018). “US elections key dates: When are the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential campaign?”. The Independent. Archived from the original on January 3, 2019. Retrieved January 3, 2019.^ “Distribution of Electoral Votes”. National Archives and Records Administration. Archived from the original on January 9, 2019. Retrieved January 3, 2019.^ “City of Milwaukee 1 of 3 finalists to host 2020 Democratic National Convention”. FOX6Now.com. June 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 1, 2018. Retrieved July 1, 2018.^ Glauber, Bill (August 22, 2018). “Selection committee for 2020 Democratic Convention will visit Milwaukee next week”. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on August 23, 2018. Retrieved August 24, 2018.^ “Let’s Take a Deep Dive Into How the WOW Counties Voted”. Milwaukee Magazine. November 6, 2020. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 16, 2020.^ Leip, David. “Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections”. uselectionatlas.org. Retrieved November 11, 2020.^ BeMiller, Haley; Bollier, Jeff (November 4, 2020). “Green Bay pads Biden’s lead in Wisconsin as Brown County overall goes for Trump”. Green Bay Press Gazette. Retrieved December 5, 2020.^ “Trump Wisconsin recount can’t start until counties canvass”. AP NEWS. November 9, 2020. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 13, 2020.^ Jeff Zeleny and Casey Tolan. “Trump campaign to seek partial recount in Wisconsin”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 18, 2020.^ Helderman, Rosalind (November 29, 2020). “Wisconsin recount confirms Biden’s win over Trump, cementing the president’s failure to change the election results”. The Washington Post. Retrieved November 30, 2020.^ “Wisconsin set to hold in-person voting in presidential primary”. Reuters. April 4, 2020. Retrieved April 5, 2020.^ Dzhanova, Yelena (March 24, 2020). “Coronavirus is disrupting the 2020 election. Here are the states that have adjusted their primaries”. CNBC. Retrieved February 21, 2021.^ Richmond, Todd (April 3, 2020). “Wisconsin barrels ahead with election despite virus fears”. AP.^ Johnson, Martin (April 4, 2020). “Wisconsin Republicans say they will ask Supreme Court to block extended absentee voting”. TheHill. Retrieved April 5, 2020.^ “Supreme Court blocks extended absentee voting in Wisconsin primary”. Channel3000.com. April 6, 2020. Retrieved April 6, 2020.^ Supreme Court of the United States (April 6, 2020). “REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. No. 19A1016” (PDF). electionlawblog.org. Retrieved April 6, 2020.^ “URGENT \u2013 Wisconsin Supreme Court Orders Election Day to Continue and U.S. Supreme Court Alters Ballot Receipt Deadline; Tallying and Reporting Results Still Prohibited Until April 13 \u2013 COVID-19”. Wisconsin Elections Commission. Retrieved April 7, 2020.^ Glauber, Bill; Marley, Patrick. “In matter of seconds, Republicans stall Gov. Tony Evers’ move to postpone Tuesday election”. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.^ Governor Evers Tweet April 1 2020^ a b Bradner, Eric; Sullivan, Kate (April 6, 2020). “Wisconsin governor orders delay of primary election until June”. CNN. Retrieved April 6, 2020.^ Ruthhart, Bill. “Wisconsin governor issues executive order to delay Tuesday’s election until June”. chicagotribune.com.^ “Wisconsin Supreme Court rules Evers cannot postpone election”. WISN. Associated Press. April 6, 2020. Retrieved April 6, 2020.^ Mystal, Elie (April 7, 2020). “SCOTUS Just Set the Stage for Republicans to Steal the Election”. ISSN\u00a00027-8378. Retrieved February 21, 2021.^ Perano, Ursula. “Wisconsin won’t be declaring a winner tonight”. Axios. Retrieved February 21, 2021.^ Mikkelson, Marti. “Milwaukee Election Chief: Despite Some Issues, In-Person Voting Went Smoothly”. www.wuwm.com. Retrieved February 21, 2021.^ “April 2020 Spring Election and Presidential Preference Primary Results”. Wisconsin Elections Commission. Wisconsin Secretary of State. Retrieved June 11, 2020.^ Canvass Results for 2020 Spring Election and Presidential Preference Vote – 4\/7\/2020 (PDF) (Report). Wisconsin Elections Commission. May 4, 2020. pp.\u00a01\u20132. Retrieved May 5, 2020.^ “Delegate Tracker”. interactives.ap.org. Associated Press. Retrieved April 30, 2020.^ “Wisconsin Republican Delegation 2020”. The Green Papers. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved April 5, 2020.^ “2020 POTUS Race ratings” (PDF). The Cook Political Report. Retrieved May 21, 2019.^ “POTUS Ratings | Inside Elections”. insideelections.com. Archived from the original on May 27, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2019.^ “Larry J. Sabato’s Crystal Ball\u00a0\u00bb 2020 President”. crystalball.centerforpolitics.org. Archived from the original on April 4, 2020. Retrieved September 25, 2019.^ “2020 Election Forecast”. Politico. November 19, 2019. Archived from the original on June 14, 2020. Retrieved April 8, 2020.^ “Battle for White House”. RCP. April 19, 2019. Archived from the original on May 3, 2020. Retrieved April 27, 2020.^ 2020 Bitecofer Model Electoral College Predictions Archived April 23, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, Niskanen Center, March 24, 2020, retrieved: April 19, 2020.^ David Chalian; Terence Burlij. “Road to 270: CNN’s debut Electoral College map for 2020”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 16, 2020. Retrieved June 16, 2020.^ “Forecasting the US elections”. The Economist. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved July 7, 2020.^ “2020 Election Battleground Tracker”. CBS News. July 12, 2020. Archived from the original on July 12, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.^ “2020 Presidential Election Interactive Map”. 270 to Win. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved April 15, 2020.^ “ABC News Race Ratings”. CBS News. July 24, 2020. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2020.^ “2020 Electoral Map Ratings: Trump Slides, Biden Advantage Expands Over 270 Votes”. NPR.org. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved August 3, 2020.^ “Biden dominates the electoral map, but here’s how the race could tighten”. NBC News. Archived from the original on August 7, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2020.^ “2020 Election Forecast”. FiveThirtyEight. August 12, 2020. Archived from the original on September 11, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.^ Dennis, LaToya (August 21, 2020). “Wisconsin Elections Commission Votes Against Allowing Kanye West, Green Party Candidates On Ballot”. www.wuwm.com. WUMW. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.^ “Green Party candidates sue to get on Wisconsin’s ballot this fall”. www.channel3000.com. CBS Madison. August 4, 2020. Retrieved December 7, 2020.^ Bice, Daniel (August 20, 2020). “Members of the state Elections Commission deadlock on whether to let Green Party on presidential ballot”. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.^ Kenny, Caroline (September 11, 2020). “Wisconsin Supreme Court temporarily blocks absentee ballots from being mailed a week before deadline”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.^ Saul, Stephanie; Corasaniti, Nick (September 14, 2020). “Wisconsin’s Top Court Rules Against Reprinting of Ballots, Avoiding Election Chaos”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.^ State of Wisconsin (November 30, 2020). “Wisconsin Certificate of Ascertainment 2020” (PDF). National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved July 17, 2021.^ Statement of Canvass for President, Vice President and Presidential Electors – General Election, November 3, 2020 (PDF) (Report). Wisconsin Elections Commission. November 30, 2020. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 11, 2020. Retrieved February 19, 2021.^ Gilbert, Craig (November 6, 2020). “Where Joe Biden won Wisconsin: Dane County and the Milwaukee County suburbs”. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved November 13, 2020.^ “County by County Report all offices.xlsx” (Microsoft Excel). Wisconsin Elections Commission. December 2020.^ “Wisconsin 2020 President exit polls”. www.cnn.com. Retrieved December 14, 2020.^ Beck, Molly; Marley, Patrick; Spicuzza, Mary (November 5, 2020). “Trump campaign hasn’t provided evidence to back up claim of Wisconsin election ‘irregularities’“. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 11, 2020.^ “Trump campaign requests costly partial recount in Wisconsin”. NBC News.^ “Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission” (PDF). July 8, 2022. Retrieved July 8, 2022. ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin statutes^ “Wisconsin Certificate of Ascertainment 2020” (PDF). US National Archives. November 30, 2020. Retrieved December 2, 2020.Further reading[edit]Summary: State Laws on Presidential Electors (PDF), Washington DC: National Association of Secretaries of State, August 2020, WisconsinDavid Weigel; Lauren Tierney (August 16, 2020), “The seven political states of Wisconsin”, Washingtonpost.com, archived from the original on September 9, 2020, retrieved September 7, 2020Nick Corasaniti; Stephanie Saul; Patricia Mazzei (September 13, 2020), “Big Voting Decisions in Florida, Wisconsin, Texas: What They Mean for November”, New York Times, archived from the original on September 13, 2020, Both parties are waging legal battles around the country over who gets to vote and how“Wisconsin Supreme Court keeps Green Party off presidential ballot and allows ballots to be mailed on time”, Cnn.com, September 14, 2020David Wasserman (October 6, 2020), “The 10 Bellwether Counties That Show How Trump Is in Serious Trouble”, The New York Times. (describes bellwether Sauk County, Wisconsin)Peter Slevin (October 10, 2020), “What Wisconsin Democrats Learned from 2016”, Newyorker.comExternal links[edit]U.S.PresidentU.S.SenateU.S.House(electionratings)GovernorsAttorneysgeneralStatelegislaturesAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyMaineMassachusettsMichigan HouseMinnesotaMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingMayorsBakersfield, CABaltimore, MDBaton Rouge, LAClearwater, FLCorpus Christi, TXEl Paso, TXFresno, CAHonolulu, HIIrvine, CALubbock, TXMesa, AZMiami-Dade County, FLMilwaukee, WIPhoenix, AZPortland, ORRichmond, VARiverside, CASacramento, CASalt Lake County, UTSan Diego, CASan Juan, PRStockton, CATulsa, OKVirginia Beach, VAWilmington, DEWinston-Salem, NCLocalClearwater, FLCook County, ILLos Angeles, CALos Angeles County, CAOrange County, CAPortland, ORSan Diego, CASan Diego County, CASan Francisco, CAWashington, DCState-wideRelated     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});after-content-x4"},{"@context":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki43\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"Enzyklop\u00e4die"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https:\/\/wiki.edu.vn\/en\/wiki43\/2020-united-states-presidential-election-in-wisconsin\/#breadcrumbitem","name":"2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin"}}]}]