# Almost disjoint sets – Wikipedia

In mathematics, two sets are **almost disjoint** ^{[1]}^{[2]} if their intersection is small in some sense; different definitions of “small” will result in different definitions of “almost disjoint”.

## Definition[edit]

The most common choice is to take “small” to mean finite. In this case, two sets are almost disjoint if their intersection is finite, i.e. if

(Here, ‘|*X*|’ denotes the cardinality of *X*, and ‘< ∞' means 'finite'.) For example, the closed intervals [0, 1] and [1, 2] are almost disjoint, because their intersection is the finite set {1}. However, the unit interval [0, 1] and the set of rational numbers **Q** are not almost disjoint, because their intersection is infinite.

This definition extends to any collection of sets. A collection of sets is **pairwise almost disjoint** or **mutually almost disjoint** if any two *distinct* sets in the collection are almost disjoint. Often the prefix “pairwise” is dropped, and a pairwise almost disjoint collection is simply called “almost disjoint”.

Formally, let *I* be an index set, and for each *i* in *I*, let *A*_{i} be a set. Then the collection of sets {*A*_{i} : *i* in *I*} is almost disjoint if for any *i* and *j* in *I*,

For example, the collection of all lines through the origin in **R**^{2} is almost disjoint, because any two of them only meet at the origin. If {*A*_{i}} is an almost disjoint collection consisting of more than one set, then clearly its intersection is finite:

However, the converse is not true—the intersection of the collection

is empty, but the collection is *not* almost disjoint; in fact, the intersection of *any* two distinct sets in this collection is infinite.

The possible cardinalities of a maximal almost disjoint family (commonly referred to as a MAD family) on the set

${displaystyle omega }$ of the natural numbers has been the object of intense study.^{[3]}^{[2]} The minimum infinite such cardinal is one of the classical Cardinal characteristics of the continuum.^{[4]}^{[5]}

## Other meanings[edit]

Sometimes “almost disjoint” is used in some other sense, or in the sense of measure theory or topological category. Here are some alternative definitions of “almost disjoint” that are sometimes used (similar definitions apply to infinite collections):

- Let κ be any cardinal number. Then two sets
*A*and*B*are almost disjoint if the cardinality of their intersection is less than κ, i.e. if

- The case of κ = 1 is simply the definition of disjoint sets; the case of

- is simply the definition of almost disjoint given above, where the intersection of
*A*and*B*is finite.

- Let
*m*be a complete measure on a measure space*X*. Then two subsets*A*and*B*of*X*are almost disjoint if their intersection is a null-set, i.e. if

- Let
*X*be a topological space. Then two subsets*A*and*B*of*X*are almost disjoint if their intersection is meagre in*X*.

## References[edit]

**^**Kunen, K. (1980), “Set Theory; an introduction to independence proofs”, North Holland, p. 47- ^
^{a}^{b}Jech, R. (2006) “Set Theory (the third millennium edition, revised and expanded)”, Springer, p. 118 **^**Eric van Douwen. The Integers and Topology. In K. Kunen and J.E. Vaughan (eds)*Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology.*North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.**^**Vaughan, Jerry E. (1990). “Chapter 11: Small uncountable cardinals and topology”. In van Mill, Jan; Reed, George M. (eds.).*Open Problems in Topology*(PDF). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company. pp. 196–218. ISBN 0-444-88768-7.**^**Blass, Andreas (January 12, 2010). “Chapter 6 : Combinatorial Cardinal Characteristics of the Continuum”. In Foreman, Matthew; Kanamori, Akihiro (eds.).*Handbook of Set Theory*(PDF). Vol. 1. Springer. pp. 395–490. ISBN 1-4020-4843-2.

## Recent Comments